Equivalence of Equipment Environmental Qualification Standards for Civil and Military Aircraft Equipment

Aerospace Standard
AIR6811
Issued

Published June 22, 2021 by SAE International in United States

Sector:

Aerospace

Issuing Committee:

AE-4 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Committee

Language: English

Data Sets - Support Documents

Title	Description	Download
Unnamed Dataset 1
Unnamed Dataset 2
Unnamed Dataset 3
Unnamed Dataset 4
Table 1	Section index
Table 2	DO-160G, section 21.4 versus MIL-STD-461G CE102
Table 3	Conducted emissions bandwidth comparison
Table 4	DO-160G, section 20.4 versus MIL-STD-461G CS114 frequency steps
Table 5	DO-160G, section 20.4 versus MIL-STD-461G CS114 test limits
Table 6	DO-160G, section 20.4 versus MIL-STD-461G CS114
Table 7	Equipment qualified using MIL-STD-461G CS114
Table 8	Equipment qualified using DO-160G, section 20.4
Table 9	Key characteristics and parameters for lightning susceptibility tests
Table 10	Equipment qualified using MIL-STD-461G CS117
Table 11	Equipment qualified using DO-160G, section 22
Table 12	DO-160G, section 21.5 versus MIL-STD-461G RE102 frequency of test
Table 13	DO-160G, section 21.5 versus MIL-STD-461G RE102 RBW
Table 14	DO-160G, section 20 versus MIL-STD-461G RS103 frequency steps
Table 15	DO-160G, section 20 versus MIL-STD-461G RS103
Table 16	Equipment qualified using MIL-STD-461G RS103
Table 17	Equipment qualified using DO-160G, section 20
Table 18	Outline of utilization voltage groups
Table 19	Comparison of figures between MIL-STD-704F and DO-160G
Table 20	AC normal operation characteristics - 400 Hz
Table 21	AC normal operation characteristics - variable frequency
Table 22	AC normal operation characteristics - 60 Hz
Table 23	28 Volt DC normal operation characteristics
Table 24	270 Volt DC normal operation characteristics
Table 25	Single phase, 400 Hz, 115 V utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 26	Three phase, 400 Hz, 115 V utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 27	Single phase, variable frequency, 115 V utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 28	Three phase, variable frequency, 115 V utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 29	Single phase, 60 Hz, 115 V utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 30	270 VDC utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 31	28 VDC utilization equipment compliance tests
Table 32	DO-160G to MIL-STD-704F comparison matrix
Table 33	MIL-HDBK-704-2 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 34	SAC101 to DO-160G comparison
Table 35	SAC102 to DO-160G comparison
Table 40	SAC108 to DO-160G comparison
Table 42	SAC110 to DO-160G comparison
Table 43	SAC201 to DO-160G comparison
Table 44	SAC301 to DO-160G comparison
Table 47	SAC401 to DO-160G comparison
Table 48	SAC601 to DO-160G comparison
Table 50	MIL-HDBK-704-3 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 51	TAC101 to DO-160G comparison
Table 52	TAC102 to DO-160G comparison
Table 58	TAC108 to DO-160G comparison
Table 60	TAC110 to DO-160G comparison
Table 61	TAC201 to DO-160G comparison
Table 62	TAC301 to DO-160 comparison
Table 65	TAC401 to DO-160G comparison
Table 66	TAC601 to DO-160G comparison
Table 68	MIL-HDBK-704-4 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 69	SVF101 to DO-160G comparison
Table 70	SVF102 to DO-160G comparison
Table 75	SVF108 to DO-160G comparison
Table 77	SVF110 to DO-160G comparison
Table 78	SVF201 to DO-160G comparison
Table 79	SVF301 to DO-160G comparison
Table 82	SVF401 to DO-160G comparison
Table 83	SVF601 to DO-160G comparison
Table 85	MIL-HDBK-704-5 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 86	TVF101 to DO-160G comparison
Table 87	TVF102 to DO-160G comparison
Table 93	TVF108 to DO-160G comparison
Table 95	TVF110 to DO-160G comparison
Table 96	TVF201 to DO-160G comparison
Table 97	TVF301 to DO-160G comparison
Table 100	TVF401 to DO-160G comparison
Table 101	TVF601 to DO-160G comparison
Table 103	MIL-HDBK-704-6 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 104	MIL-HDBK-704-7 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 105	HDC101 to DO-160G comparison
Table 106	HDC102 to DO-160G comparison
Table 110	HDC105 test recommendations for civil certification environments
Table 111	HDC105 test recommendations for military qualified environments
Table 112	HDC201 to DO-160G comparison
Table 115	HDC301 to DO-160G comparison
Table 118	HDC401 to DO-160G comparison
Table 120	HDC601 to DO-160G comparison
Table 122	MIL-HDBK-704-8 to DO-160G cross-reference
Table 123	LDC101 to DO-160G comparison
Table 124	LDC102 to DO-160G comparison
Table 128	LDC105 test recommendations for civil certification environments
Table 129	LDC105 test recommendations for military qualified environments
Table 130	LDC201 to DO-160G comparison
Table 131	LDC201 test recommendations for civil certification environments
Table 132	LDC201 test recommendations for military qualified environments
Table 133	LDC301 to DO-160G comparison
Table 135	LDC302 test recommendations for civil certification environments
Table 136	LDC302 test recommendations for military qualified environments
Table 137	LDC401 to DO-160G comparison
Table 138	LDC501 to DO-160G comparison
Table 139	LDC601 to DO-160G comparison
Table 141	MIL-STD-810G and DO-160G evaluation substitution guidance
Table 142	MIL-STD-810G and DO-160G evaluation section index
Table 143	Pressure test method summary table
Table 144	MIL-STD-810G pressure comparison table
Table 145	DO-160G pressure comparison table
Table 146	Temperature test method comparison table
Table 147	MIL-STD-810G temperature comparison table
Table 148	DO-160G temperature comparison table
Table 149	Storage temperature test cycle comparison
Table 150	Operational temperature test cycle comparison
Table 151	Fluids test method comparison table
Table 152	MIL-STD-810G fluids comparison table
Table 153	DO-160G fluids comparison table
Table 154	Waterproofness test method comparison table
Table 155	MIL-STD-810G waterproofness comparison table
Table 156	DO-160G waterproofness comparison table
Table 157	Humidity test method comparison table
Table 158	MIL-STD-810G humidity comparison table
Table 159	DO-160G humidity comparison table
Table 160	Humidity induced/natural test cycle comparison
Table 161	Humidity aggravated/accelerated test cycle comparison
Table 165	DO-160G salt fog method comparison table
Table 166	Sand and dust method comparison table
Table 167	MIL-STD-810G sand and dust method comparison table
Table 168	DO-160G sand and dust method comparison table
Table 169	Explosive atmosphere test method comparison table
Table 170	MIL-STD-810G explosive atmosphere comparison table
Table 171	DO-160G explosive atmosphere comparison table
Table 172	Acceleration test method summary table
Table 173	MIL-STD-810G acceleration comparison table
Table 175	Vibration test method comparison table
Table 176	MIL-STD-810G vibration comparison table
Table 177	DO-160G vibration comparison table
Table 178	Shock method comparison table
Table 179	MIL-STD-810G shock method comparison table
Table 180	DO-160G operational shock and crash safety comparison table
Table 181	Icing test method comparison table
Table 183	DO-160G icing comparison table

Reference

Number	Title

Citation
	(MAC / WIN)
	(MAC / WIN)
	(MAC / WIN)
	(MAC / WIN)

File Format:	Number of Results:
Select Fields to Export
Item Number	Content Type
Title	Author(s)
Affiliation(s)	Publisher
Publish Date	Abstract/scope
Citation	DOI

Equivalence of Equipment Environmental Qualification Standards for Civil and Military Aircraft Equipment

Scope

Rationale

Topic

Data Sets - Support Documents

Issuing Committee

Reference

Revisions

Revision History*