This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Mechanical Properties of the Cadaveric and Hybrid III Lumbar Spines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 02, 1998 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Stapp Car Crash Conference
This study identified the mechanical properties of ten cadaveric lumbar spines and two Hybrid III lumbar spines. Eight tests were performed on each specimen: tension, compression, anterior shear, posterior shear, left lateral shear, flexion, extension and left lateral bending. Each test was run at a displacement rate of 100 mm/sec. The maximum displacements were selected to approximate the loading range of a 50 km/h Hybrid III dummy sled test and to be non-destructive to the specimens. Load, linear displacement and angular displacement data were collected. Bending moment was calculated from force data.
Each mode of loading demonstrated consistent characteristics. The load-displacement curves of the Hybrid III lumbar spine demonstrated an initial region of high stiffness followed by a region of constant stiffness. The exception to this rule was the tension tests, as the steel cables that run the length of the spine appear to dominate the mechanical response of the Hybrid III spine in tensile loading. The loading curves of the cadaveric spines demonstrated an initial region of low stiffness followed by a region of increasing stiffness, as is typical of soft tissue response. Notable findings included the observation that the whole cadaveric lumbar spine specimens are stiffer in posterior shear than in anterior shear. This finding is in contrast to motion segment studies, in which the opposite trend is observed. This difference is believed to be due to the freedom of vertebrae L1 through L5 to rotate in the whole lumbar spine specimens. In functional spinal unit shear tests, both vertebrae are rigidly potted.
CitationDemetropoulos, C., Yang, K., Grimm, M., Khalil, T. et al., "Mechanical Properties of the Cadaveric and Hybrid III Lumbar Spines," SAE Technical Paper 983160, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/983160.
- Begeman, P.C. Visarius, H. Nolte, L. P. Prasad, P “Viscoelastic Shear Response of the Cadaver and Hybrid III Lumbar Spine” Proc. 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference 1 15 SAE 1994
- Berkson, M.H. Nachemson, A. Schultz, A.B. “Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments -- Part II: Response in Compression and Shear; Influence of Gross Morphology” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 101 53 57 1979
- Brown, T. Hansen, R.J. Yorba, A.J. “Some Mechanical Tests on the Lumbosacral Spine with Particular Reference to the Intervertebral Discs” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 39-A 5 1135 1164 1957
- El-Bohy, A.A. Yang, K.H. King, A.I. “Experimental Verification of Facet Load Transmission by Direct Measurement of Facet Lamina Contact Pressure” Journal of Biomechanics 22 931 941 1989
- Irwin, A.L. General Motors Corporation, Research and Development Center, Safety Research Department 1996
- Markolf, K.L. “Deformation of the Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Joints in Response to External Loads - A Biomechanical Study Using Autopsy Material” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 54-A 3 511 533 1972
- Panjabi, M.M. Krag, M.H. Chung, T.Q. “Effects of Disc Injury on Mechanical Behavior of the Human Spine” Spine 9 7 707 713 1984
- Rolander, S.D. “Motion of the Lumbar Spine with Special Reference to the Stabilizing Effect of Posterior Fusion - An Experimental Study on Autopsy Specimens” Acta Orthop Scand (Supp.) 90 1 144 1966
- Virgin, W.J. “Experimental Investigations into the Physical Properties of the Intervertebral Disc” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 33-B 607 611 1951
- Yang, K.H. King, A.I. “Mechanism of Facet Load Transmission as a Hypothesis for Low Back Pain” Spine 9 557 565 1984
- Yoganadan, N. Cusic, J.F. Pintar, F.A. Droese, K. Reinartz, J. “Cyclic Compression - Flexion of the Human Lumbar Spine” 19 7 Spine 784 791 1994