This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Societal Impacts of Fuel Options for Fuel Cell Vehicles
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Methanol, gasoline and hydrogen are the primary fuel options under consideration for fuel cell vehicles (FCV). The ideal fuel would eliminate local air pollution, substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions and oil imports, cost no more than current transportation fuels per mile driven, and require little investment in new infrastructure. In addition, the fuel used for future fuel cell vehicles should be suitable for near-term hybrid electric vehicles using internal combustion engines, to avoid the need for introducing more than one new motor fuel in the 21st century.
All three primary FCV fuels have limitations: gasoline is the most difficult to reform to produce hydrogen and produces the least improvement in the environment and yields the least oil import reductions. Methanol is cleaner, easier to reform onboard the FCV, eliminates oil imports, but requires some new infrastructure. Hydrogen provides the best environmental and oil import improvements, but requires the largest infrastructure investment. This paper will provide a comprehensive comparison of FCV fuels and their societal impact on local air pollution, greenhouse gases and oil imports. In addition, we will estimate the likely infrastructure costs for each fuel, and compare their societal impact if used as a fuel for hybrid electric vehicles.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Thomas, C., James, B., Lomax, F., and Kuhn, I., "Societal Impacts of Fuel Options for Fuel Cell Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 982496, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/982496.Also In
References
- James Brian D. Thomas C. E. Baum George N. Lomax, Franklin D. Jr. Kuhn, Ira F. Jr. “Making the Case for Direct Hydrogen Storage in Fuel Cell Vehicles,” Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Association's 8th Annual U.S. Hydrogen Meeting Alexandria, Virginia 11 13 March 1997 447
- Brown Stuart F. “The Automakers' Big-Time Bet on Fuel Cells,” Fortune March 30 1998 122
- Inbody Mike Tafoya Jose Hedstrom Jim Vanderborgh Nick “Fuel Cell Stack Testing at Los Alamos National Laboratory,” U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cells for Transportation Exploratory R&D Program Meeting Washington, D.C. September 25 26 1996
- Wald Matthew L. “In Step Toward Better Electric Car, Fuel Cell Used to Get Energy from Gasoline,” The New York Times October 21 1997
- Zawodzinski T. Mueller B. Bauman J. Rockward T. Savett S. Springer T. Uribe F. Valero J. Gottesfeld S. “Reformate Tolerance in PEFCs,” Annual National Laboratory R&D Meeting of the DOE Fuel Cells for Transportation Program Los Alamos, New Mexico July 28 29 1998
- Thomas C. E. James B. D. Lomax, F. D. Jr. Kuhn, I F. Jr. Integrated Analysis of Hydrogen Passenger Vehicle Transportation Pathways National Renewable Energy Laboratory under Subcontract No. AXE-6-16685-01 March 1998
- Smith J. Ray Aceves Salvador “Hybrid Vehicle System Studies and Optimized Hydrogen Engine Design,” DOE Hydrogen Program Review Coral Gables, Florida April 18 21 1995
- Little Arthur D. “Fuel Cell Powerplant System Considerations,” Environmental Vehicles '96 Conference January 22 1996
- Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies R&D Plan: Energy-Efficient Vehicles for a Cleaner Environment Office of Transportation Technologies, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U. S. Department of Energy Report No. DOE/ORO/2065 March 1998
- Jordan Jim “Global Methanol Review,” International Methanol Producers and Consumers Association San Juan, Puerto Rico May 4 6 1998
- Looking Beyond the Internal Combustion Engine: The Promise of Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicles American Methanol Institute Nowell Gregory P. State University of New York Albany, Washington, D.C.
- Mark Jason “Fuel Choices for Fuel Cell Vehicles: Environment vs. Infrastructure,” Proceedings of the World Car Conference Riverside, California 19 22 January 1997 393
- Ogden Joan Cox Adam White Jason “Options for Refueling Hydrogen Vehicles: A Southern California Case Study,” Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Association's 7th Annual U.S. Hydrogen Meeting Alexandria, Virginia April 2 4 1996 111
- Thomas C. E. James B. D. Kuhn I. F. Lomax F. L. Baum G. N. Direct-Hydrogen-Fueled Proton-Exchange-Membrane Fuel Cell System for Transportation Applications: Hydrogen Infrastructure Report U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation technologies by the Ford Motor Company Report No. DOE/CE/50389-504 July 1997
- Thomas C. E. Kuhn, I. F. Jr. James B. D. Lomax, F. D. Jr. Baum G. N. “Affordable Hydrogen Supply Pathways for Fuel Cell Vehicles,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 23 6 507 516 1998
- Ogden Joan Steinbugler Margaret Kreutz Thomas “Hydrogen as a Fuel for Fuel Cell Vehicles: A Technical and Economic Comparison,” Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Association's 8th Annual U.S. Hydrogen Meeting Alexandria, Virginia 11 13 March 1997 469 Ogden Joan August 19 1998
- Ross Marc Goodwin Rob Watkins Rick University of Michigan Wang Michael Q. Argonne National Laboratory Wenzel Tom Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory “Real-World Emissions from Model Year 1993, 2000 and 2010 Passenger Cars,” American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Berkeley, California November 1995
- Proposed Amendments to California Exhaust, Evaporative and Refueling Emission Standards and Test Procedures for Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles,- “LEV II,” and Proposed Amendments to California Motor Vehicle Certification, Assembly-Line and In-Use Test Requirements, “CAP 2000,” State of California Air Resources Board June 19 1998
- Delucchi Mark A. “Summary of Results from the Revised Model of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from the use of Transportation Fuels and Electricity,” Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Davis, California November 1996