This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Hydroformed Structural Elements: An Economic Evaluation of the Technology
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Hyrdroformed tubes have seen use in the aerospace industry for many years and are seeing increased use in the automotive body-in-white (BIW). The automotive industry has chosen to use hydroformings for a number of reasons including reduced part weight, piece count reduction, and the flexibility to form complex shapes of varying wall thickness. With all of these potential advantages, still one more provides the greatest incentive to switch from a stamped assembly to a hydroformed tube: the ability to reduce cost. It is generally accepted that hydroformings can indeed be cost effective to produce, yet the question remains: when should a stamped assembly be replaced by a hydroformed component?
This paper will attempt to answer the question above by laying out several case studies and comparing their direct manufacturing costs. By using a spreadsheet based costing methodology known as Technical Cost Modeling, it is possible to identify the parameters that drive direct manufacturing costs and discover how two processes compete as these parameters vary.
Recommended Content
Citation
Hannibal, T. and Dieffenbach, J., "Hydroformed Structural Elements: An Economic Evaluation of the Technology," SAE Technical Paper 980451, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/980451.Also In
References
- American Iron and Steel Institue Fact Sheet
- Law Alex “Dodge's Fast Route To A New Sport-Ute,” Automotive Industries Chilton Co. New York, NY October 1997
- Busch John V. Technical Cost Modeling of Plastics Fabrication Processes Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 1987
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. “Technical Cost Modeling: A Cost Simulation Tool for Material and Process Selection,” International Forum on Design for Manufacture and Assembly Boothroyd and Dewhurst, Inc. Wakefield RI 1992
- Busch John V. Dieffenbach Jeff R. “Economic Criteria for Sensible Selection of Body Panel Materials,” 1991 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress Warrendale PA February 1991
- Mascarin Anthony E. Dieffenach Jeff R. “Fender Material Systems: A Lifecycle Cost Comparison,” 1992 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress Warrendale PA February 1992
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. Mascarin Anthony E. Fisher Michael M. “The Automobile Recycling Infrastructure: Process Cost Simulation,” 1993 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress Warrendale PA February 1993
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. Emmons Bruce J. “A Manufacturing Cost Analysis of Tube and Node Steel Spaceframes,” 1994 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress Warrendale PA February 1994
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. Sokol Andrew “Solventborne Painting of a Steel Autobody: A Manufacturing Cost Analysis of Conventional and UV Bake Curing,” 1995 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress Warrendale PA February 1995
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. Palmer Paul D. Mascarin Anthony E. “Making the PNGV Supercar a Reality With Carbon Fiber: Pragmatic Goal or Pipe Dream?,” 1996 Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress Warrendale PA February 1996