This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Multiple Issues Surrounding the Feasibility of LCA Impact Assessment
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The presentation evaluates the feasibility for life-cycle impact assessment to yield accurate, useful results for sound decision-making. The evaluation raises feasibility issues based on (1) inherent scale issues, e.g., spatial and temporal discontinuities, between LCA and most environmental processes; (2) disparities between LCA threshold and dose-response assumptions and actual environmental processes; (3) extensive use of value-based subjective judgment and opinion to create environmental categories, equivalency models, and scores; and (4) the current lack of systems to indicate whether real and relevant differences are identified. All of these issues limit or constrain the decisions that can be made solely from LCA. The origins of these issue lie in procedures and calculations that are fundamental to life-cycle inventory: data collection and aggregation across multiple system operations, allocation rules for emissions and resources, and data normalization to a study functional unit. These operations remove spatial, temporal, and other considerations, resulting in significant interpretive limitations. In addition, although often presented as a technical or scientific process, extensive value-based subjective judgments are employed throughout impact assessment. Some of these judgments compromise or conflict with scientific knowledge, e.g., when independent processes or compounds are aggregated into a numerical score. There is a significant range and mix of these scale issues, process assumptions, and subjective judgments. For example, the most useful results may be for global, long lived processes with known mechanisms. Problematic areas involve transient or local processes, those measured by biological parameters, e.g., biodiversity habitat and toxicity, and those involving independent mechanisms. As a result, one cannot quantify or predict actual environmental impacts using LCA. In some cases, current practices can generate a hazard estimate that may be useful to guide pollution prevention and resource conservation strategies. Otherwise, various scores often have no substantive support for their relevance. The evaluation helps to identify and track these issues to improve interpretation of LCA impact assessment results and suggests that a significant level of caution is needed in using LCA results for decision-making.
Authors
Citation
Owens, J., "Multiple Issues Surrounding the Feasibility of LCA Impact Assessment," SAE Technical Paper 971210, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/971210.Also In
References
- Hunt, R.G. Sellers, J.D. Franklin W.E. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. “Resource and environmental profile analysis: A life cycle environmental assessment for products and procedures.” 12 245 1992
- USEPA Life-cycle assessment: Inventory guidelines and principles Battelle and Franklin Associates, Inc. Cincinnati, OH 1993
- SETAC A technical framework for life-cycle assessment Fava J. Denison R. Jones B. Curran M. Vigon B. Selke S. Barnum J. Proceedings of a workshop in Smugglers Notch, VT, USA Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pensacola, FL August 18-23 1990 1991
- SETAC A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment Fava J. Consoli F. Denison R. Dickson K. Mohin T. Vigon B. Proceedings of a workshop in Sandestin, FL, USA Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pensacola, FL February 1-7 1992 1993
- ISO “Life Cycle Impact Assessment.” International Standards Organization TC 207 Environmental Management, SC 5 Life Cycle Assessment Paris 1996
- Steen, B. Ryding, S.-O. The EPS-Envrio-Accounting method. An application of environmental accounting principles for evaluation and valuation of environmental impact in product design Institute för Vatten- och Luftvärdsforskning Gothenburg, Sweden 1992
- BUMWAL Methodology for ecological balances A report from the working group on Eco-Balance Swiss Federal Ministry of the Environment, Forest, and Countryside Zurich, Switzerland
- Lindfors, L.-G. Christiansen, K. Hoffman, L. Virtanen, Y. Juntilla, V. Leskinen, A. Hanssen, O.-J. Rønning, A. Ekvall, T. Finnveden G. LCA-Nordic technical reports No. 10 Committee on Cleaner Technology, Nordic Council of Ministers Söborg, DK 1995
- Lindfors, L.-G. Christiansen, K. Hoffman, L. Virtanen, Y. Juntilla, V. Hanssen, O.-J. Rønning, A. Ekvall, T. Finnveden G. Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment Nordic Council of Ministers Copenhagen 1995
- Arnold, F.S. J. Environ. Law. Sci. “Why environmental life cycle assessment doesn't work.” 1995 4 1995
- Perriman, R.J. SETAC-Europe LCA-News “Is LCA losing its way?” 5 1 4 1995
- White, P. De Smet, B. Udo de Haes, H. A. Heijungs R. SETAC-Europe LCA-News “LCA back on track - But is it one track or two?” 5 3 4 1995
- Owens, J.W. Intl. J. Life Cycle Assessment “LCA impact assessment categories: Technical feasibility and accuracy.” 1 3 151 1996
- Owens, J.W. Intl. J. Life Cycle Assessment “LCA impact assessment: Case study using a consumer product.” 1 4 209 1996
- SETAC “Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Report of the SETAC-Europe Workgroup on Life Cycle Impact Assessment (WIA) Udo de Haes H.A. SETAC-Europe Brussels 1996
- SETAC “Life Cycle Impact Assessment: The State-of-the Art.” Report of the SETAC LCA Impact Assessment Work Group November 1996 Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pensacola, FL 1996
- US EPA Life-cycle impact assessment: A conceptual framework, key issues, and summary of existing methods Research Triangle Institute for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Reduction Laboratory, Office of Research and Development Cincinnati, OH 1995
- SETAC Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A “Code of Practice.” Consoli F. Allen D. Boustead I. Fava J. Franklin W. Jensen A.A. de Oude N. Parrish R. Perriman R. Postlethwaite D. Quay B. Séguin J. Vigon B. SETAC Press Pensacola, FL 1993
- ISO “Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework.” International Standards Organization Draft International Standard 14040 and “Life Cycle - Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory” Committee Draft 14041 Paris 1996
- White, P.R. De Smet, B. Owens, J.W. Hindle, P. Resources, Conservation and Recycling “Environmental management in an international consumer goods company.” 14 171 1995
- APME Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry (4 volumes) Association of Plastic Manufacturers in Europe/Plastic Waste Management Institute Avenue E. Van Nieuwenhuyse 4, Box 3; B-1160 Brussels, Belgium 1992-1994