This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Relative Sensitivity of Formability to Anisotropy
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This work compares the relative importance of material anisotropy in sheet forming as compared to other material and process variables. The comparison is made quantitative by the use of normalized dependencies of depth to failure (forming limit is reached) on various measures of anisotropy, as well as strain and rate sensitivity, friction, and tooling. Comparisons are made for a variety of forming processes examined previously in the literature as well as two examples of complex stampings in this work. The examples cover a range from nearly pure draw to nearly pure stretch situations, and show that for materials following a quadratic yield criterion, anisotropy is among the most sensitive parameters influencing formability. For materials following higher-exponent yield criteria, the dependency is milder but is still of the order of most other process parameters. However, depending on the particular forming operation, it is shown that in some cases anisotropy may be ignored, whereas in others its consideration is crucial to a good quality analysis.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Logan, R. and Maker, B., "The Relative Sensitivity of Formability to Anisotropy," SAE Technical Paper 970440, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/970440.Also In
References
- Logan, R.W. “Use of Non-Quadratic Yield Surfaces in Design of Optimal Deep-Draw Blank Geometry” SAE paper 960597 Sheet Metal Stamping for Automotive Applications SAE Warrendale, PA 1996 61
- Lee, J.K. Kinzel, G.L. Wagoner, R.H. “NUMISHEET 96” Proc. 3rd Int'l Conf: Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes The Ohio State University 1996
- Logan, R.W. Meuleman, D.J. Hosford, W.F. “The Effects of Anisotropy on the Limiting Drawing Ratio” Formability and Metallurgical Structure Sachdev A.K. Embury J.D. TMS-AIME 1987 159
- Havranek, J. “Wrinkling Limit of Tapered Pressings” J. Aust. Inst. Metals 20 1975 114
- Havranek, J. Sheet Metal Forming and Energy Conservation , Proc. 7th IDDRG 1977 245
- Logan, R.W. “Sheet Metal Formability: Simulation and Experiment” University of Michigan 1985
- Wilson, D.V. Butler, R.D. “The Role of Cup-Drawing Tests in Measuring Drawability” J. Inst. Metals 90 1962 473
- Dorward, R.C. “Forming Characteristics of Coarse and Fine-Grained AA 2024 Aluminum Alloy Sheet” J. Mater. Engineering and Performance 3 1994 115
- Kobayashi, S. Oh, S.I. Altan, T. Metal Forming and the Finite-Element Method Oxford Univ. Press New York 1979
- Maker, B.N. “Finite Element Modeling of a Hydroformed Sheet Metal Cover” Univ. California, LLNL 1988
- Logan, R.W. Thomas, D.B. Young, G.K. “Implementation of a Pressure and Rate Dependent Forming Limit Diagram Model into NIKE and DYNA” 1 Concurrent Product and Process Engineering Thangaraj A.R. Gadh R. Billatos S. ASME Book H01017 1995
- Hill, R. The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity Clarendon Press Oxford 1948
- Hill, R. “Theoretical Plasticity of Textured Aggregates” Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 75 1979 179
- Hosford, W.F. “On Yield Loci of Anisotropic Cubic Metals” Proc. 7th N. Amer. Metal Working Research Conf. SME Dearborn 1979 191
- Barlat, F. Lian, J. “Plastic Behavior and Stretchability of Sheet Metals, Part I: A Yield Function for Orthotropic Sheets Under Plane Stress Conditions” Int. J. Plasticity 5 1989 51 66
- Hallquist, J.O. LS-DYNA3D Theoretical Manual Livermore Software Technology Corp. Livermore, CA 1993
- Maker, B.N. Hallquist, J.O. LS-NIKE3D Theoretical Manual Livermore Software Technology Corp. Livermore, CA 1993
- Logan, R.W. “Implications of a ‘Cross-Rolled’ Yield Surface Approximation On Deep Drawing” NUMISHEET 96 , Proc. 3rd Int'l Conf: Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes Lee, J.K. Kinzel, G.L. Wagoner, R.H. The Ohio State University 1996