This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Designing for Stealth in Fighter Aircraft (Stealth from the Aircraft Designer's Viewpoint)
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The reduction or other control of an aircraft's radar, infrared, visual and acoustic signatures can greatly improve its survival, resulting in improved weapons' effectiveness. Although radar stealth is important, it is pointless without low observability in the other regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. However, this paper, for reasons of brevity will concentrate on methods to control radar signature only. The topics of: benefits of signature control; contributions of an aircraft to its radar cross section (RCS); methods to reduce RCS; penalties/costs of RCS-reduction, in terms of performance, volume, weight and maintenance; use of radar absorbing and structural composite materials are addressed. The conclusion is that while signature control is important, there are penalties to be paid. RCS-reduction has become merely another factor to be considered in the series of compromises made during aircraft design trade-offs.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | The Have Blue Technology Demonstrator and Radar Cross Section Reduction |
| Journal Article | Qualification and Full-Scale Test of the Airbus A400M Barrier Net |
| Technical Paper | TRENDS IN MODERN AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN |
Authors
Citation
Whitford, R., "Designing for Stealth in Fighter Aircraft (Stealth from the Aircraft Designer's Viewpoint)," SAE Technical Paper 965540, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/965540.Also In
References
- Knott E.F. Shaeffer J.F. Tuley M.T. Radar Cross Section Artech House 1985
- Fuhs A.E. Radar Cross Section Lectures AIAA 1984
- Germany reveals secret stealth fighter research Flight 8-14 Mar 1995
- Howe D. Introduction to the Basic Technology of Stealth Aircraft Part 1 & 2 Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power Jan 1991 113
- Ball R.E. The Fundamentals of Aircraft Combat Survivability Analysis and Design AIAA Education Series 1985
- Navy request for AX proposals sets preference for stealthy new design 9 Sept 1990
- Lorell M. et al. The Gray Threat: Assessing the Next Generation European Fighters RAND Doc. MR-611-AF 1995
- ACC weighs plans for new technology 29 April 1996
- Goldsmith E.L. et al Air Intakes for High Speed Vehicles 1991
- Whitford R. Design for Air Combat Jane's Information Systems 1989
- B-2 Pilot Report 17 Apr. 1995
- Growth predicted for stealth payloads 6 March 1996
- F-22 Special Report 24 July 1995
- F-22 fix to cost $20-25 Million Av. Wk. May 16 1994
- Building the B-2 Flight International 10 July 1990
- Salmon S. Presentation on EF2000 RMCS Shrivenham Jan 1996
- F-117's precision adds lethality to strike packages 29 April 1996
- F-117A's performance boosts wide range of improvements 24 June 1991
- Long range strike needs drive black programmes 6 Feb. 1995
- F-22 fix to cost $20-25 Million May 16 1994
- Richardson D. Stealth Warplanes Salamander Books 1989
- Production F/A-18s incorporate RAM 25 Sept 1995
- The F/A-18 Evolution Continues First AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology and Operations Congress Los Angeles Sept 1995
- Whitford R. A Fighter Aircraft Chronology
- Lewis S Demonstrating Value RAeS Aerospace Oct 1995
- Hinds B. B-2 Flight Test Results SETP European Symposium June 1990
- Yeo C. EF2000-from the cockpit RAeS Aerospace Dec 1995
- USAF believes Impulse radar not feasible for detecting B-2 26 Feb. 1990
- USAF study asserts that Soviet defences would be ineffective against B-2 bomber 30 Oct 1990
- Long range strike needs drive black programmes 6 Feb. 1995
- Sweetman W. The future of airborne stealth International Defense Review 27 March 1994
- Loh M. Gen. Presentation on constraint analysis applied to the design of the F-22 DFAN/USAF Academy 5 Oct 1994
- Shaw D.E. Lee C.S. Aerodynamic Design for Supersonic Flight 1987