This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Seat Stiffness in Out-of-Position Occupant Response in Rear-End Collisions
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Accident data suggest that a significant percentage of rear impacts involve occupants seated in other than a “Normal Seated Position”. Pre-impact acceleration due to steering, braking or a prior frontal impact may cause the driver to move away from the seat back prior to impact. Nevertheless, virtually all crash testing is conducted with dummies in the optimum “Normal Dummy Seated Position”. A series of 7 rear impact sled tests, having a nominal AV of 21 mph, with Hybrid III dummies positioned in the “Normal Dummy Seated Position”, “Out of Position” and slightly “Out of Position” is presented. Tests were performed on yielding production Toyota and Mercedes Benz seats as well as on a much stiffer modified Ford Aerostar seat. Available Hybrid III upper and lower neck as well as torso instrumentation was used to analyze and compare injury potential for each set of test parameters. In all cases, neck forces and moments were found to increase when the dummy's torso was leaned forward at impact. For the out-of-position tests, the results showed that the upper neck loads were clearly related to seat stiffness; stiffer seats produced greater neck loading. The lower neck loads, however, showed no definite correlation with seat back stiffness.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Evaluation of Seat Back Strength and Seat Belt Effectiveness in Rear End Impacts |
| Technical Paper | Rear Impact Tests of Starcraft-Type Seats with Out-of-Position and In-Position Dummies |
Authors
Citation
Benson, B., Smith, G., Kent, R., and Monson, C., "Effect of Seat Stiffness in Out-of-Position Occupant Response in Rear-End Collisions," SAE Technical Paper 962434, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/962434.Also In
References
- [James, 1996] James, Michael B. et. al “Severe and Fatal Injuries in Rear-End Impacts”
- [James, 1991] James, Michael B. et. al “Occupant Protection in Rear-End Collisions: I. Safety Priorities and Seat Belt Effectiveness” SAE #9 129 13 35th Stapp Conference 369 November 199 1
- [Mackay, 1995] Mackay, G.M. et. al “Rear End Collisions and Seat Performance - To Yield or Not To Yield.” 39th Annual AAAM Proceedings 23 1 Chicago, IL October 16-18 1995
- [Melvin, 1985] Melvin, John W. “Advanced Anthropomorphic Test Device (AATD) Development Program Phase 1 Reports: Concept Definition UMTRI for US Department of Transportation 101 1985
- [Mertz, 1968] Mertz, Harold J. “Car Occupant Response to Rear-End Collision - A Mathematical Model,” 1st International Conference on Vehicle Mechanics 588 Detroit, MI July 16-18 1968
- [Saczalski, 1993] Saczalski, Kenneth J. et. al “Field Accident Evaluations and Experimental Study of Seat Back Performance Relative to Rear-Impact Occupant Protection” SAE # 930346 Seat System Comfort and Safety 151 March 1993
- [Strother, 1994] Strother, Charles E. et. al “Response of Out-of-Position Dummies in Rear Impact” SAE #94 1055 In-Depth Accident Investigations: Trauma Team Findings in Late Model Vehicle Collisions 65 February 28 1994
- [Warner, 1991] Warner, Charles Y. et. al “Occupant Protection in Rear-End Collisions: II. The Role of Seat Back Deformation in Injury Reduction” SAE # 912914 35th Stapp Conference 379 March 199 1