This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Texas Project: Part 2 - Control System Characteristics of Aftermarket CNG and LNG Conversions for Light-Duty Vehicles
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The Texas Project involves the conversion of light-duty vehicles, up to and heavy light-duty trucks, to bi-fueled vehicles using commercially available aftermarket CNG and LPG conversion systems. The test fleet includes 68 dual fueled conversions. Virtually every type of aftermarket conversion technology for CNG and LPG was evaluated: eight different CNG and seven different LPG conversion “kits”, all of which are modern systems incorporating closed-loop control. The kits were installed and calibrated according to the manufacturer's guidelines and recommendations. The emissions when operating on the alternative fuel were compared to those when operating on certification gasoline to determine the “success” of the conversion. Many of these conversions, performed according to the manufacturer's requirements, were not “successful” (worse emissions than for gasoline operation). In almost all cases, the problem was NOx emissions that were too high when operating on the alternative fuel. To aid understanding of this problem, detailed measurements of the exhaust oxygen sensor output and air/fuel ratio control output signal from the alternative fuel computer (when available) were recorded and analyzed. It was found that some of the kits operate too lean and/or have control systems that are too slow. Another potential problem is too much timing advance. For some of the vehicle/kit combinations for which the data indicated that adjustments might be beneficial, recalibrations were performed. Many vehicle/kit combinations showed a benefit from the recalibrations, but some kits did not work on any installations, even after recalibration. It is concluded that some conversion technologies are simply much better than others. It was also found that some vehicles appear to be inherently more difficult to convert. Potential reasons for this characteristic are discussed.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Chiu, J. and Matthews, R., "The Texas Project: Part 2 - Control System Characteristics of Aftermarket CNG and LNG Conversions for Light-Duty Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 962099, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/962099.Also In
References
- Matthews, R.D. Chiu J. Zheng J. Wu D.-Y Dardalis D. Hall M.J. Ellzey J.E. Mock C. Love G. 1996 “1995 Annual Report - The Texas Project: Light-duty vehicle conversions to natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas” Combustion and Engines Research Program Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712
- Matthews, R.D. Chiu J. Zheng J. Wu D.-Y Dardalis D. Shen K. Roberts C. Hall M.J. Ellzey J.E. Mock C. Wicker R B. Jaeger S 1996 “The Texas Project Part 1 - Emissions and fuel economy of aftermarket CNG and LPG conversions of light- duty vehicles” SAE Paper 962098
- Wu, D.-Y Matthews R.D. Zheng J. Shen K. Chiu J Mock C. Jaeger S 1996 “The Texas Project Part 3 - Off-cycle emissions of light-duty vehicles operating on CNG, LPG, federal phase 1 reformulated gasoline, and/or low sulfur certification gasoline” SAE Paper 962100
- Pahl, R.H. McNally M.J. 1990 “Fuel blending and analysis for the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program” SAE Paper 902098
- Koehl, W.J. Benson J.D. Burns V.R. Gorse R.A. Hochhauser A.M. Knepper J.C. Leppard W.R. Painter L.J. Rapp L.A. Reuter R.M. Rutherford J.A. 1993 “Effects of gasoline sulfur level on exhaust mass and speciated emissions: the question of linearity - Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program” SAE Paper 932727
- Lindhjem, C.E. 1995 “The effect of gasoline reformulation and sulfur reduction on exhaust emissions from post-1983 but pre-1990 vehicles” SAE Paper 950778
- Mayotte, S.C. Lindhjem C.E. Rao V. Sklar M.S 1994 “Reformulated gasoline effects on exhaust emissions: phase I: initial investigation of oxygenate, volatility, distillation, and sulfur effects” SAE Paper 941973
- Mayotte, S.C. Rao V. Lindhjem C.E. Sklar M.S. 1994 “Reformulated gasoline effects on exhaust emissions: phase II: continued investigation of the effects of fuel oxygenate content, oxygenate type, volatility, sulfur, olefins, and distillation parameters” SAE Paper 941974
- Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program 1995 “Effects of gasoline T50, T90, and sulfur on exhaust emissions of current and future vehicles” AQIRP Technical Bulletin No. 18 August
- Sawyer, R.F. 1992 “Reformulated gasoline for automotive emissions reduction” 24th Symposium (International) on Combustion Combustion Institute Pittsburgh 1423 1432
- Bass, E. Bailey B. Jaeger S. 1993 “LPG conversion and HC emissions speciation of a light-duty vehicle” SAE Paper 932745
- Whitney, K.A. Bailey B.K. 1994 “Determination of combustion products from alternative fuels - part I: LPG and CNG combustion products” SAE Paper 941903
- Matthews, R.D. Chiu J. Hilden D. 1996 “CNG compositions in Texas and the effects of composition on emissions, fuel economy, and driveability of NGVs” SAE Paper 962097
- Bass, E.A. 1993 “Evaluation of aftermarket LPG conversion kits in light-duty vehicle applications” Final Report NREL/TP-421-5462
- California Air Resources Board “Preliminary reactivity adjustment factors” Mobile Source Division, Air Resources Board State of California Environmental Protection Agency
- California Air Resources Board 1995 “Proposed California exhaust emission standards and test procedures for 1988 and subsequent model year passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles” 10 20 95
- Motta, R.C. Kelly K.J. Warnock W.W. 1996 “Compressed natural gas and liquidfied petroleum gas conversions: the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's experience” NREL/SP-425-20514
- Chiu J. Kubesh J.T. Southwest Research Institute August 1996