This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Lean-Burn, Sub-Compact Natural Gas Vehicle
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This study evaluates a prototype, light-duty natural gas vehicle using lean-burn technology. Emissions and fuel economy for lean-burn operation are compared to that of stoichiometric operation. The vehicle is a sub-compact, 1991 Chevrolet Turbo Sprint. Multi-port natural gas injection was used to fuel the engine at a relative air/fuel ratio of 1 4.
The main analysis evaluates emissions and fuel economy of lean-burn operation using California Air Resources Board specified emission-testing fuel. Comparisons are made to stoichiometric natural gas and gasoline operation. As well, engine-out versus tail-pipe emissions are presented, along with a brief analysis of emission sensitivity to fuel composition.
Lean-burn results show a 33 3% improvement in fuel economy over Transport Canada's gasoline results and a 9 5% improvement over stoichiometric operation on natural gas. Emissions of CO and NMOG for lean-burn operation were encouraging however, Nox levels were over 30 times greater than for stoichiometric operation and 3 5 times higher than the U.S. Federal Tier 1 Nox limit.
Stoichiometric operation demonstrated the potential to meet ultra-low emission vehicle standards. As well fuel economy measured 21 7% higher than that measured by Transportation Canada on gasoline.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Hill, S., Sulatisky, M., Lychak, J., Nakamura, K. et al., "A Lean-Burn, Sub-Compact Natural Gas Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 961676, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/961676.Also In
References
- Sulatisky M T Hill S Lychak J “Adapting A Geo Metro to Run on Natural Gas Using Fuel Injection Technology Phase II, Stoichiometric System” December 1994
- Horie K et al “The Development of a High Fuel Economy and High Performance Four-Valve Lean-burn Engine’ Honda SAE Technical Paper No 920455 1992
- Hill S Sulatisky M Lychak J “The Application of Lean Burn Technology to a Subcompact, Light-Duty Natural Gas Vehicle” Saskatchewan Research Council 1996
- Rideout G “Emissions Evaluation of a Fuel Injected Natural Gas Suzuki Turbo Sprint” Environment Canada 1995
- Green C Lawson A ‘Emissions Durability of 1994 GFI Equipped Bi Fuel Natural Gas Vehicles’ Proceedings of the 1995 Windsor Workshop on Alternative Fuels 1995
- Raine R R Jones G M “Comparison of Temperatures Measured in Natural Gas and Gasoline Fuelled Engines” SAE Technical Paper No 901503 1990
- Evans, R.L Blaszczyk “Fast-Burn Chamber Design For Natural Gas Engines” 25-4 ASME 1995
- Siewert Robert et al “Environmental Potential of Natural Gas Fuel for Light-Duty Vehicles An Engine-Dynamometer Study of Exhaust-Emission-Control Strategies and Fuel Consumption” SAE Technical Paper No 932744 1993
- Iwakiri Yasunori et al ‘Study on Paramaters Affecting NMOG Measurements and a Method to Improve its Accuracy’ Nissan Motor Co SAE Technical Paper No 930387 1993