This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Failure of Finite Element Codes for Spacecraft Thermal Analysis
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Despite recent advances in computer aided design (CAD) based tools, spacecraft thermal analysis remains outside the realm of finite element method (FEM) based analysis. The primary complaints against FEM often cited are:
- 1.FEM is not based on physical principles.
- 2.FEM codes do not provide procedural modeling for heaters, heat pipes, or other abstract thermal control components.
- 3.Inadequate radiation analysis capabilities.
- 4.FEM codes generate inappropriately large thermal models.
However, a failure on the part of existing FEM based codes does not invalidate the advantages of the Finite Element Method. Properly implemented, FEM based systems can have significant advantages.
A simple first law interpretation of FEM is presented, and shows that finite difference (FD) and FEM meshes may co-exist in the same thermal model, and solved using traditional analyzers such as SINDA/FLUINT.
A description of an integrated FD/FEM based system that efficiently satisfies all areas of spacecraft thermal analysis, including thermal radiation, is also presented.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Transient Dynamic Analysis of an Automotive Bumper System |
Technical Paper | An Assessment of a FEA NVH CAE Body Model for Design Capability |
Technical Paper | CAE Approach for Thermal-Acoustical Protective Shields |
Authors
Citation
Panczak, T., "The Failure of Finite Element Codes for Spacecraft Thermal Analysis," SAE Technical Paper 961450, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/961450.Also In
References
- Cullimore, B.A. “Advances in SINDA/FLUINT and SINAPS,” 26th ICES Conference 1996
- Kreyszig, E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics Fourth John Wiley & Sons New York 1979
- Schneider, G. E. Raw, M. J. “A New Control-Volume-Based Finite Element Procedure for the Numerical Solution of the Fluid Flow and Scalar Transport Equations,” Final Report to Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Chalk River, Ontario January 1986
- Costello, F. A. Costello C. F. “Node Geometries and Conductances in Spacecraft Thermal Models,” SAE paper 951698 , 25th ICES Conference 1995
- Zienkiewicz, O. C. Morgan, K. Finite Elements and Approximation John Wiley and Sons New York 1984
- Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company “Thermal Radiation Analysis System Users Manual,” October 1991
- Panczak, T. et al. “Thermal Synthesizer System: An Integrated Approach to Spacecraft Thermal Analysis,” SAE paper 911582 , 22nd ICES Conference July 1992
- Chin, J. H. Panczak, T. D. Fried, L. “Finite Element and Raytracing in Coupled Thermal Problems,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Thermal Problems 683 701 Pineridge Press Swansea, U.K. 1989
- Cook, G. M. Hodgetts, C. Stock, N. J. Planas Almazan, P. “Using Finite Element Discretisation for Spacecraft Thermal Analysis,” SAE paper 951608 , 25th ICES Conference 1995
- Sillion, F. X. Puech, C. Radiosity and Global Illumination Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, California 1994
- Zatz, H. R. Galerkin Radiosity: “A Higher Order Solution Method for Global Illumination,” Computer Graphics Proceedings ACM SIGGRAPH 1993
- Panczak, T. Ring, S. “RadCAD: Integrating Radiation Analysis with Modern CAD systems,” 26th ICES conference July 1996
- Panczak, T. Ring, S. “True Computer Aided Thermal Engineering: A Geometric and Nongeometric Simulation Environment,” Final Report for NASA/MSFC July 1996