This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Flow-Field Simulations of Three Simplified Vehicle Shapes and Comparisons with Experimental Measurements
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The growing applications of Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) tools have been motivated by the need to create more effective product development processes. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), as one of the CAE tools, has enjoyed growing popularity for analysis of many airflow situations, including road vehicle aerodynamics. In many cases, these applications have been limited by the level of predictive accuracy that is possible with CFD codes today. In the present exercise, simplified representations of three vehicle models (1:12 scale) were chosen to assess the overall level of predictability of the GMTEC CFD code, using detailed measurements that were made in a scale-model wind tunnel. The CFD computations used two turbulence models (standard k-εand RNG k-ε) and were matched to the experimental geometry and test conditions. The comparisons revealed that the CFD predictions were able to track relative changes in drag between the three models with acceptable engineering accuracy (less than 4 percent error of relative drag). Accurate prediction of the drag coefficient for each model was limited by many factors, including available computer resources, and the need for further understanding of the twin issues of turbulence modeling and steady-state simulation of inherently unsteady flows.
Recommended Content
Authors
- Taeyoung Han - General Motors Research & Development Center
- V. Sumantran - General Motors Research & Development Center
- Clark Harris - General Motors Research & Development Center
- Ted Kuzmanov - General Motors Research & Development Center
- Mark Huebler - General Motors Research & Development Center
- Thomas Zak - General Motors Research & Development Center
Topic
Citation
Han, T., Sumantran, V., Harris, C., Kuzmanov, T. et al., "Flow-Field Simulations of Three Simplified Vehicle Shapes and Comparisons with Experimental Measurements," SAE Technical Paper 960678, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/960678.Also In
Vehicle Aerodynamics: Wind Tunnels, Cfd, Aeroacoustics, and Ground Transportation Systems
Number: SP-1145; Published: 1996-02-01
Number: SP-1145; Published: 1996-02-01
References
- Sumantran V. Hammond D.C. “Experimental data for the Evaluation of Computational Models of Flow over Automobile-like Bluff Bodies: Geometries and Experimental Conditions” GMR-6078 Research Publication December 1987
- Haworth D.C. El Tahry S.H. Huebler M.S. Chang S. “Multidimensional Port-and-Cylinder-Flow Calculations for Two-and Four-Valve-per-Cylinder Engines: Influence of Intake Configuration on Flow Structure,” SAE Paper 900257 1990
- Han T. “A Navier-Stokes Analysis of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Flows around a Bluff Body in Ground Proximity,” AIAA Paper 88-3766 July 1988
- Launder B.E. Spalding D.B. “The Numerical Calculation of Turbulent Flows,” Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 3 March 1974 269 289
- Yakhot V. Orszag S.A. “Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence. I. Basic Theory,” Journal of Scientific Computing 1 1 1986 3 51
- Issa R.I. “Solution of the Implicitly Discretized Fluid Flow Equations by Operator-Splitting,” Journal of Computational Physics 62 Jan. 1986 40 65
- El Tahry S.H. Ashcraft C. private communication March 1987
- Patel V.C. Rodi W Scheuerer G. “Turbulence Models for Near-Wall and Low Reynolds Number Flows: A Review,” AIAA Journal 23 9 1984 1308 1319
- Chen H.C. Patel V.C. “Near-Wall Turbulence Models for Complex Flows Including Separation,” AIAA Journal 26 6 1988 641 648
- Launder B.E. “Current Capabilities for Modeling Turbulence in Industrial Flows,” J. of Applied Scientific Research 48 1991 247 269
- Fluent Inc. “introduction to Renormalization Group Method and Turbulence Modeling,” Fluent Technical Memorandum , TM-107 Jan. 1993
- Yakhot V. Orszag S.A. Thangam S. Gatski T.B. Speziale C.G. “Development of Turbulence Models for Shear Flows by a Double Expansion Technique,” Physics Fluids, A 4 7 July 1992 1510 1520