This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Limited Mesh Refinement Study of the Aerodynamic Flow Field Around a Car-Like Shape: Computational Versus Experimental Fluid Dynamics
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has found increasing use by aerodynamicists in recent years. Highly affordable computer hardware coupled with advances in computational techniques and availability of commercial CFD codes support this trend. However, as is true with any computer simulation, there is always a need for comparing aerodynamic CFD predictions extensively to the results measured in wind tunnel experiments.
One such calibration study has been initiated by Ford Motor Company to assess the predictive ability of commercially available CFD codes for the aerodynamic design of automobile shapes. Several codes have been checked against a set of detailed wind tunnel measurements on a number of car shapes. The work is being continued to date. This study has provided a significant information base for comparison of predicted and measured flow fields.
This report presents a limited mesh sensitivity analysis using a commercially available code, FIDAP, to predict the wind tunnel measurements of the C1 notchback car shape.
Results from three different discretizations are compared with the experiment. In general, the calculated and measured centerline pressure distributions on the front end and underbody compare well for all the meshes. The wake flow structure and floor pressure distributions show significant improvement for the denser mesh. The predicted drag coefficient is in good agreement with the measurement.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Hajiloo, A., Williams, J., Hackett, J., and Thompson, S., "Limited Mesh Refinement Study of the Aerodynamic Flow Field Around a Car-Like Shape: Computational Versus Experimental Fluid Dynamics," SAE Technical Paper 960677, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/960677.Also In
Vehicle Aerodynamics: Wind Tunnels, Cfd, Aeroacoustics, and Ground Transportation Systems
Number: SP-1145; Published: 1996-02-01
Number: SP-1145; Published: 1996-02-01
References
- Williams, J. et al. “A CFD Calibration Study for Automotive Shapes” 18th AIAA Aerospace Ground Testing Conference AIAA 94-2607 1994
- Williams, J. Hajiloo, A. “Aerodynamic Flow Field Around Two Car-Like Shapes, Computational vs. Experimental Fluid Dynamics” FIDAP Users Group Conference 1995
- “FIDAP 7.0 Theory Manual” Fluid Dynamics International April 1993
- “ICEM CFD/CAE 3.13, Multi-block Structured Grid Generation” July 1994
- Haroutunian V. Engelman, M.S. “On modelling wall-bound turbulent flows using specialized near-wall finite elements and the standard k-e turbulence model” Advances in Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flows ASME 1991
- Haroutunian V. Engelman, M.S. “Two equation simulation of turbulent flows: A commentary on physical and numerical aspects” Advances in Finite Element Analysis in Fluid Dynamics ASME 1993
- Hughes, T.J.R. Brooks, A. “A multidimensional upwind scheme with no cross-wind diffusion” Finite Element Methods for Advection Dominated Flows ASME-AMD 34
- Haroutunian, V. Engelman, M.S. Hasbani, I. “Segregated finite element algorithms for the numerical solution of large-scale incompressible flow problems” Int. J. for Numer. Methods in Fluids 1993