This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Methanol Supply Issues for Alternative Fuels Demonstration Programs
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This paper surveys issues affecting the supply of fuel-grade methanol for the California Energy Commission's alternative fuels demonstration programs and operations by other public agencies such as transit and school districts. Establishing stable and reasonably priced sources of methanol (in particular) and of alternative fuels generally is essential to their demonstration and commercialization. Development both of vehicle technologies and of fuel supply and distribution are complementary and must proceed in parallel. However, the sequence of scaling up supply and distribution is not necessarily smooth; achievement of volume thresholds in demand and through-put of alternative fuels are marked by different kinds of challenges.
Four basic conditions should be met in establishing a fuel supply: (1) it must be price competitive with petroleum-based fuels, at least when accounting for environmental and performance benefits; (2) bulk supply must be meet volumes required at each phase; necessitating resilience among suppliers and a means of designating priority for high value users; (3) distribution systems must be reliable, comporting with end users' operational schedules; (4) volatility in prices to the end user for the fuel must be minimal.
The California Energy Commission's California Fuel Methanol Reserve (CFMR), based on a framework of agreements with the methanol industry to mobilize private sector storage and distribution facilities was designed in an effort to meet these conditions. However, conditions in the world methanol markets have threatened to overwhelm the price/supply stabilization hitherto provided by the CFMR, with demand for methanol as a feedstock for MTBE pricing methanol out of the existing direct fuel market.
California clean air regulations include a mandatory “make-available” provision for alternative fuels, including methanol, once alternative-fueled vehicle production reaches certain thresholds. Because of the gradual market development thus far, triggering of these provisions may affect the situation but is unlikely to alter it dramatically.
Current and projected fuel volumes appear to be insufficient to induce necessary economies of scale in production and distribution for fuel use. Despite their benefits, existing programs will suffer absent measures to secure economical fuel supplies. One solution is to develop sources that are dedicated to fuel markets and located within the end-use region.
Methanol still represents an important alternative fuel, since it is readily available from renewable sources, offers clean air benefits and is an excellent energy carrier, especially for advanced vehicle propulsion systems such as fuel cells.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Teague, J. and Koyama, K., "Methanol Supply Issues for Alternative Fuels Demonstration Programs," SAE Technical Paper 952771, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/952771.Also In
References
- California Energy Commission 1993 California Oxygenates Outlook 18 et. seq. March 1993
- “Newest Fuel Cells Show Great Potential for Energy Industry,” Press Release by Public Information Office Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA July 6 1995 testimony by James Schroeder, JPL, at December 8, 1994 California Air Resources Board Hearing on M100 Flame Luminosity Standards Sacramento, CA
- Crocco, J.R. “World Methanol Outlook,” I 4 1993 World Methanol Conference Houston, Texas 1994
- Katofsky, Ryan E. The Production of Fluid Fuels from Biomass PU/CEES Report No. 279 iii 35 et. seq. Princeton University, center for Energy and Environmental Studies Princeton, New Jersey June 1993
- Natural Gas Supply and Price Document 93-4 Northwest Power Planning Council Portland, OR July 7 1995
- Curtis, John B. et al. “A Comparison of Estimates of Ultimately Recoverable Quantities of Natural Gas in the United States, A Report of the Potential Gas Committee,” Potential Gas Agency, Colorado School of Mines June 1993
- “Methanol from Biomass,” NREL/SP-420-5570 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO March 1994
- Tiangco, Val et al., Draft Biomass Resource Assessment Report for California 2 9 2 32 California Energy Commission Sacramento, CA May 1 1994
- Crocco, J.R. CMAI “The Global Methanol Industry Turned an Important Corner” I 5 et. seq. 1994 World Methanol Conference, November 29-December 1, 1994 Houston, TX 1995
- “Chevron signs renewable methanol agreement with Terameth,” 1 Oxy-Fuel News April 24 1995 1 May 2 1994 Hart Publications Arlington, VA
- Methanex Corporation Annual Report 1994 18 19
- Sperling, Daniel New Transportation Fuels: A Strategic Approach to Technological Change 205 212 University of California Press Berkeley, CA 1989
- California Energy Commission Save School Bus Clean Fuel Efficiency Demonstration Program: Interim Status Report 5 7 9 Sacramento, CA September 1993
- Rowden, Michael Hayden Thomas Fox Donna “Intake Ssystem Deposit Experience with M85 Vehicles,” 4 1 4 12 Saiter, Barbara A. “Field Problems Associated with the Use of M85 and M100,” 4 13 4 24 CRC Invormal Workshop Handling Methanol & Ethanol Automobile Fuels September 21-22 1992 San Diego,CA
- California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board Initial Statement of Reasons for a Proposed Statewide Regulation to Amend Certification and Test Procedures for Vapor Recovery Systems 5 May 12 1995 Sacramento, CA
- Clean Fuels Program Title 13, Subchapter 8, California Code of Regulations Sections 2300-2317
- California Energy Commission Technical Analysis Section, California Air Resources Board “Low-Emission Vehicles/Clean Fuels Regulations,” May 3 1995
- Blackburn, Bill “FFVs in California as of 6/27/95” Transportation Technology and Fuels Office staff memorandum July 1995 California Energy Commission
- California Energy Commission Methanol as a Motor Fuel: Review of the Issues Related to Air Quality, Demand, Supply, Cost, Consumer Acceptance and Health and Safety 6 13 6 14 Consultant Report by Acurex Environmental Corporation. Sacramento, CA April 1989
- California Energy Commission Staff Memorandum by Mike McCormack, Transportation Technology and Fuels Office September 30 1995
- California Energy Commission Fuels Report 21 et. seq. Sacramento, CA February 1994
- Alcohol Week's New Fuels Report TECNON Monthly Methanol Newsletter West Coast Transaction Prices July 1995
- California Energy Commission California Oxygenate Outlook 18 24 Sacramento, CA March 1993
- Skasko, Steven G. Enron Clean Fuels Company “Overview of the Current U.S. Methanol Market,” 1993 World Methanol Conference II 5 et. seq. Houston, TX 1994
- Crocco, J.R. CMAI loc. cit. I 2
- Methanex Corporation Annual Report 1993 and Annual Report 1994 19 23
- Moger, Todd, Trammochem, “U.S. Supply/Demand Outlook II 1 et. seq. 1994 World Methanol Conference , November 29-December 1, 1994 Houston, TX 1995
- Methanex Corporation Annual Report 1994 9 14
- U.S. Department of Energy Biofuels at the Crossroads: Strategic Plan for the Biofuels Systems Program National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL SP-420-5877; NTIS Springfield, VA March 1994
- Borgwardt, Robert Steinberg Meyer Dong Yuanji “Reduction of CO2 Emissions from Mobile Sources by Alternative Fuels Derived from Biomass,” Proceedings of Tenth International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels November 1993
- California Energy Commission “Report of Meeting with Texaco Inc. regarding Restart of Coolwater Project -- Syngas to Methanol Project, February 7, 1995,” February 15 1995
- Hart/IRI and Bonner & Moore Associates, Inc. Refining Economics Report “Methanol Supply and Demand,” 17 August 1995
- July 24 1995 1360 I St., N.W., Suite 80, Washington, DC 2005