This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Engine Oil Effects on Fuel Economy in GM Vehicles - Comparison with the ASTM Sequence VI-A Engine Dynamometer Test
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1995 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Nine engine oils were evaluated in two GM vehicles: a 1993 Pontiac Grand Am with a 2.3L Quad4 engine and a 1993 Buick LeSabre with a 3.8L (3800) V-6 engine. Standard EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) fuel economy (FE), vehicle-dynamometer tests were conducted. The results were compared with the fuel economy obtained with a standard ASTM reference oil (BC). The vehicle data from this program were used in evaluating the new engine-dynamometer ASTM Sequence VI-A test designed to predict “real world” fuel economy in vehicles.
EPA 55/45 combined fuel economy performance in the GM vehicles ranged from almost 2 percent improvement (over the BC oil) for an SAE 5W-20 oil, to over 2 percent poorer fuel economy than the reference oil for an SAE 20W-50 oil. The two different engines responded similarly to the different oils and showed similar trends. Both engines showed increases in fuel economy (as measured with the BC reference oil) over the more than 16,000 km (10,000 miles) accumulated during the program. This increase in fuel economy is believed to be due to engine break in.
The fuel economy results could not be correlated to a high degree of significance with either kinematic viscosity at 100°C or HTHS viscosity. Although fuel economy tended to decrease with increasing viscosity (by both measures), considerable scatter in the data suggested that factors other than viscosity (differences in the frictional characteristics being the most likely) are important.
Sequence VI-A results correlated reasonably well with the vehicle results. Only one oil, ASTM FM-8, containing an extreme dose of a non-commercial friction modifier, did not seem to fit the correlation. This may be because the GM engines operate at higher temperatures than the Sequence VI-A Ford 4.6L engine. Overall, however, the data confirm the ability of the proposed Sequence VI-A test to predict fuel economy gains from engine oil for the “average” GM vehicle.
CitationTseregounis, S. and McMillan, M., "Engine Oil Effects on Fuel Economy in GM Vehicles - Comparison with the ASTM Sequence VI-A Engine Dynamometer Test," SAE Technical Paper 952347, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/952347.
SAE 1995 Transactions: Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V104-4; Published: 1996-09-01
Number: V104-4; Published: 1996-09-01
- The Relationship Between High Temperature Oil Rheology and Engine Operation A status report, ASTM DS-62 American Society of Testing and Materials Philadelphia 1985
- Kajdas, C. “Engine Oil Additives: A General Overview” “ Engine Oils and Automotive Lubrication ” Bartz Wilfried J. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, NY 1993
- ASTM D-2 Proposal P101 Proposed Method of Measuring the Energy-Conserving Quality of Engine Oils in Vehicles ASTM Research Report D02-1143 1981
- Heath, D.J. Brown, J.G. Famsworth, G.R. Patrick, R.J. Zahalka, T.L “ ASTM's Development of the Sequence VI Fuel Efficient Engine Oil Dynamometer Test ” SAE Technical Paper 872120
- Sequence VIA Test Development ASTM Research Report 1995
- Akiyama, K. Ueda, F. Miyake, J. Tasaka, K. Sugiyama, S. “ Fuel Economy Performance of the Highly Efficient Fuel Economy Oils Using Chassis Dynamometer Test ” SAE Technical Paper 932690
- Dancy, J.H Alexander, D.A. Lindholm, S.O. Diberto, C.D. “ An Investigation of Engine Oil Viscosity Loss in Passenger Car Service and Its Characterization ” SAE Technical Paper 922295
- Quader, A.A. “ Why Intake Charge Dilution Decreases Nitric Oxide Emission from Spark Ignition Engines ” General Motors Research Laboratories Research Publication GMR-1033 January 1971
- Damrath, J.G. Papay, A.G. “ Fuel Economy Factors in Lubricants ” SAE Technical Paper 821226
- Clevenger, A.G. Carlson, D.C. Kleiser, W.M. “ The Effects of Engine Oil Viscosity and Composition on Fuel Efficiency” SAE Technical Paper 841389