This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Effect of Limiting Shoulder Belt Load with Air Bag Restraint
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The dilemma of using a shoulder belt force limiter with a 3-point belt system is selecting a limit load that will balance the reduced risk of significant thoracic injury due to the shoulder belt loading of the chest against the increased risk of significant head injury due to the greater upper torso motion allowed by the shoulder belt load limiter. However, with the use of air bags, this dilemma is more manageable since it only occurs for non-deploy accidents where the risk of significant head injury is low even for the unbelted occupant. A study was done using a validated occupant dynamics model of the Hybrid III dummy to investigate the effects that a prescribed set of shoulder belt force limits had on head and thoracic responses for 48 and 56 km/h barrier simulations with driver air bag deployment and for threshold crash severity simulations with no air bag deployment. For the belt/bag/occupant configuration that was evaluated, the analysis gives an optimum shoulder belt load limit that minimizes the dummy responses in the 56 km/h simulation without significantly increasing the risk of significant head injury in the non-deploy simulations.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Occupant Displacement Model for Restrained Adults in Vehicle Frontal Impacts |
| Technical Paper | Application of Human Models in Vehicle Rollover |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Mertz, H., Williamson, J., and Vander Lugt, D., "The Effect of Limiting Shoulder Belt Load with Air Bag Restraint," SAE Technical Paper 950886, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950886.Also In
Advances in Occupant Protection Technologies for the Mid-Nineties
Number: SP-1077; Published: 1995-02-01
Number: SP-1077; Published: 1995-02-01
References
- Foret-Bruno, J. Y. Hartman, F. Thomas, C. Fayon, A. Tarriere, C. Patel, A. “Correlation Between Thoracic Lesions and Force Values Measured at the Shoulder of 92 Belted Occupants Involved in Real Accidents” Twenty-Second Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE 780892 October 1978
- Foret-Bruno, J. Y. Brun-Cassan, F. Brigout, C. Tarriere, C. “Thoracic Deflection of Hybrid III Dummy Response for Simulations of Real Accidents” 12th Experimental Safety Vehicle Conference Gothenburg, Sweden 1989
- Mertz, H. J. Horsch, J. D. Horn, G. Lowne, R. W. “Hybrid III Sternal Deflection Associated with Thoracic Injury Severities of Occupants Restrained with Force-Limiting Shoulder Belts” SAE 910812 SP-852 February 1991
- Fleck, J. T. Butler, F. E. “Validation of the Crash Victim Simulation” DOT HS-806 279 282 1981
- Wang, J. T. Nefske, D. J. “A New CAL 3D Air Bag Inflation Model” SAE 880654 1988
- Deng, Y. C. “Development of a Mathematical Model for Predicting a Belt-Restrained Occupant Response in Automotive Crash” Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection in Transportation Systems ASME H00854 169 223 234 1993
- Prasad, P. Mertz, H. J. “The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment” SAE 851246 May 1985
- Guidelines for Evaluating Out-of-Position Vehicle Occupant Interactions with Deploying Air Bags SAE Information Report J1980 November 1990
- Klove, E. H. Oglesby, R. N. “Special Problems and Considerations in the Development of Air Cushion Restraint Systems” SAE 720411 May 1972