This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Air Bag Effectiveness - Trading Major Injuries for Minor Ones
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1995 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A number of articles in professional journals and newspapers have questioned the effectiveness of supplemental air bags. The articles maintain that insurance injury claims have increased after adoption of air bag systems and thus air bags provide no net benefit. The insurance industry itself disagreed with this interpretation of its own data, but their protest is not highly publicized.
The object of this paper is to shed light on the effectiveness of air bags using the National Accident Sampling System (NASS) of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Our results indicated that the air bags are doing what they were designed to do, that is, to decrease the severity of injuries in major accidents. On the other hand, air bags sometimes might cause minor injuries, when no injury would have occurred without air bags. Since minor accidents are more frequent than major accidents, the frequency of injuries might increase when air bags are introduced. This does not mean that air bags are ineffective; on the contrary, the air bags decrease the severity of major injuries in exchange for increasing the number of minor injuries, surely a desirable design tradeoff.
CitationLibertiny, G., "Air Bag Effectiveness - Trading Major Injuries for Minor Ones," SAE Technical Paper 950871, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950871.
- Miller, K. “Insurance Claims Data Don't Show Advantage of Some Auto Devices” Wall Street Journal March 17 1994
- Peterson S. P. Hoffer G. E. “The Impact of Airbag on Relative Personal Injury and Absolute Collision Insurance Claims” Journal of Consumer Research 20 March 1994
- “Air-bag cars have higher crash rate” Washington Times December 30 1994
- “Media Still Distorting HLDI Data on Air Bags, Antilocks.” Insurance Institute for Highway Safety March 1994
- Williams, A. F. Hazelbaker, K. L. “Comments on ‘The Impact of Air Bag Adoption on Relative Personal Injury and Absolute Collision Insurance Claims’ by Peterson and Hoffer.” Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute February 1994
- O'Neill, B. Letter to the Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal “Safety Quiz.” Highway Loss Data Institute March 17 1994
- O'Neill, B. Letter to the Editor of the New York Times “As Cars Get Safer, Drivers Ignore Risks” Highway Loss Data Institute April 12 1994
- Peltzman, S. “The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulations.” Journal of Political Economy 1983
- Chirinko, R. S. Harper, E. P. “Buckle Up or Slow Down? New Estimates of Offsetting Behavior and Their Implications for Automobile Safety Regulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12 2 1993
- Evans, L. “Traffic Safety and the Driver” Van Nostrand Reinhold 1991
- Hoffer, G. Millner, E. “What is Driving Behavioral Change” Letter to the Editor, Cato Review of Business and Government 1993
- “Correlation of NCAP Performance with Fatality Risk in Actual Head-On Collisions” NHTSA Technical Report January 1994
- “Traffic Safety Facts 1993” NHTSA October 1994
- “The Abbreviated Injury Scale” American Association for Automotive Medicine 1985