This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Simulation of Frontal Barrier Offset Impacts and Comparison of Intrusions and Decelerations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1995 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The European safety regulation plan regarding frontal barrier offset impact calls for 30° angular impact protection in 1995 and a perpendicular 40% offset deformable barrier impact protection in the 1998 time frame. However, various other governmental and private agencies are looking at alternative test conditions. The Auto Motor and Sport Magazine and other insurance agencies have been conducting rigid barrier front impact tests at 40 and 50% offsets. In this study various test conditions were examined analytically. Detailed finite element models were developed to understand the implications of these impact conditions. The models provided insight into energy management mechanism, load transfer and vehicle deformation patterns due to offset impacts on to perpendicular and angular barriers. Several potential offset conditions were simulated using the FEA models. These were 50% offset perpendicular rigid barrier impact, 40% offset perpendicular rigid barrier impact, 40 and 50% offset perpendicular deformable barrier impact, and 30° angular impact with and without an anti-skid device on the rigid barrier. Dash and toe board intrusions, as well as vehicle deceleration pulses, were compared to identify the key considerations. Deformation patterns in the engine compartment and in body side structures were also examined. Model predictions were validated against prototype test data.
Details of NCAP and offset impacts, comparison of model results for various impact conditions and the correlations with test data are presented in this paper.
|Technical Paper||Laser and MIG Weld Failure CAE Modeling Method for Aluminum Structure Crash Analysis|
|Technical Paper||Dynamic Modeling and Correlation to Impact Testing of Welded Ribbed Plaques|
|Technical Paper||Computer Simulation of Wheel Impact Test|
CitationSaha, N., Calso, S., Prasad, P., and Asjad, M., "Simulation of Frontal Barrier Offset Impacts and Comparison of Intrusions and Decelerations," SAE Technical Paper 950647, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950647.
Issues in Automotive Safety Technology: Offset Frontal Crashes, Airbags, and Belt Restraint Effectiveness
Number: SP-1072; Published: 1995-02-01
Number: SP-1072; Published: 1995-02-01
- Scheunert, D. et. al. 1992 “What is a Realistic Frontal Offset Test Procedure” 1992 IRCOBI
- Hobbs, C.A. 1991 “The Need for Improved Structural Integrity in Frontal Car Impacts” Transport and Road Research Laboratory 13 ESV-Conference Paris
- Saha, N.K. 1989 “Design of Automotive Components for Crash Energy Management using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques,” Proceeding of the 21st Midwestern Mechanics Conference Houghton, Michigan
- Saha, N.K. 1992 “Numerical Simulation of Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection” Computational Methods for Crashworthiness - NASA Conference Publication 3223 Langley Research Center Virginia
- Saha, N.K. Wang, H.C. El-Achkar, R.E. 1992 “Frontal Offset Pole Impact Simulation Of Automotive Vehicles,” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference San Francisco
- Midoun, D.E. Yang, J.S. Shrivastava, S. Co, J.Y. 1993 “An Integrated Structure-Dummy Finite Element Front Impact System Model,” 13th ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference San Diego
- Vander Ligt, D.A. Chen, R.J. Deshpande, A.S. 1987 “Passenger Car Frontal Barrier Simulation Using Nonlinear Finite Element Methods,” SAE Paper 871958 Detroit
- Liu, J.K.H 1991 “Predicting SIR Sensor Closure Time Using Full Vehicle Finite Element Analysis,” 126 19 Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection in Transportation Systems, ASME Winter Annual Meeting Atlanta