This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Vacuum Brazing Filler Metal Mg Level and Surface Tension on Heat Exchanger Fillet Sizes
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, in cooperation with Ravenswood Aluminum Corporation, conducted a program to determine the optimum Mg level in aluminum-silicon vacuum brazing filler alloys. Most users of vacuum brazing sheet operate at one extreme or the other, i.e., Mg levels around 0.2% or near 1.5%. Both alloy families have problems. We fabricated and brazed several brazing sheet materials with K319 cores (similar to AA3005) and 4045 type filler metals with Mg levels ranging from 0.2% up to 2.0%. The optimum magnesium level in Al-10Si filler metals typically used in vacuum brazing applications was determined to be in the range from 0.6% to 1.0%. Filler metal Mg levels outside the optimum range result in smaller fillet sizes. Empirical data suggest that for filler metal Mg levels about 1.00%, fillet sizes are about twice those for filler metals containing approximately 0.2% Mg. When the Mg level has been optimized around the 1.0% level, the fillet sizes are 25% to 50% larger than for the 1.5% Mg alloy. The mechanism responsible for the change in fillet size as a function of Mg level can be explained by examining the role of surface tension (wetting) on the joint formation. Magnesium is a very effective liquid-vapor surface tension (γLV) modifier of molten aluminum. When the Mg level is near 0.2%, γLV≈ 720 Dynes/cm. This relatively high surface tension does not allow the filler metal to easily flow into the joint or to thoroughly wet the surfaces. As the Mg level in the filler metal is increased, the surface tension continuously decreases. Within the optimum range, the surface tension ranges from γLV≈ 640 to 660 Dynes/cm. Above 1.25% Mg, γLV approaches 630 Dynes/cm. As γLV decreases, the filler metal wets the surfaces too well. The filler metal not only wets the joints, but the surrounding surfaces as well. This results in smoother, but smaller joints.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Inert Atmosphere Fluxless Brazing of Aluminum Heat Exchangers |
| Technical Paper | Laser Welding of Aluminum Alloy Plate, Extrusion and Casting |
| Technical Paper | Progress in the Development of High Strength Titanium Alloys |
Authors
Citation
Childree, D. and Harris, J., "Effect of Vacuum Brazing Filler Metal Mg Level and Surface Tension on Heat Exchanger Fillet Sizes," SAE Technical Paper 950120, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950120.Also In
References
- McCurran, B. Nicholas, M. G. “A Study of Aluminum Brazes Using Hot Stage Scanning Electron Microscopy,” Welding Research Supplement October 1984 295s 299s
- Ambrose, J. C. Nicholas, M. G. “Alloys for Vacuum Brazing Aluminum,” Braying and Soldering 11 1986 34 38
- Creber, D. K. Ball, J. Field, D. J. “A Mechanistic Study of Aluminum Vacuum Brazing,” Society of Automotive Engineers Detroit, Mi. Paper No. 87-0185 Feb. 1987
- Winterbottom, W. L. “Process Control Criteria for Brazing Aluminum Under Vacuum,” Welding Journal October 1984 33 39
- Schmatz, D. J. Winterbottom, W. L. “Fluxless Brazing of Aluminum in Inert Gas,” December 23 1980
- Winterbottom, W. L. “Fluxless Braze Processing of Aluminum,” March 13 1979
- Anderson, W. A. “Metallurgical Studies of the Vacuum Brazing of Aluminum,” Welding Research Supplement October 1977 314s 318s
- Kawase, H. et al. “Study of a Method for Evaluating the Brazeability of Aluminum Sheet,” Welding Research Supplement October 1989 396s 403s
- Ishikawa, K. Kawase, H. “Study on Mechanism of Aluminum Vacuum Brazing,” Aluminum Alloys-Their Physical and Mechanical Properties I Engineering Materials Advisory Services U.K. 1986 141 153
- Sugiyama, Y. “Brazing of Aluminum Alloys,” Welding International 8 1989 700 710
- Vernia, P. “Mechanism for Critical Magnesium Diffusion in Vacuum Brazing of Aluminum Sheet,” Welding Research Supplement October 1981 194s 198s
- Yoshimi, N. et al. “A New Approach to Estimating Wetting in a Reaction System,” Materials Transactions JIM 31 2 1990 141 147
- Haginoya, I. “On Oxidation of Molten Al-Mg Alloys in Air” Japanese Light Metals 24 8 1974 364 371
- Korolkov, A., M. et al. “Surface Tension of Aluminum Melts,” Issledovanie Splavov Tsvetnykh 2 1960 122 134
- Lang, G. “Casting Properties and Surface Tension of Aluminum and Binary Aluminum Alloys, Part III: Surface Tension,” Aluminum 49 3 1973 231 238
- Lang, G. “Casting Properties and Surface Tension of Aluminum and Binary Aluminum Alloys, Part I: Fluidity” Aluminum 48 10 1972 664 672