This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Aggregate Vehicle Emission Estimates for Evaluating Control Strategies
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 01, 1994 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Currently, states that are out of compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards must, according to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), develop and implement control strategies that demonstrate specific degrees of reduction in emissions-with the degree of reduction depending upon the severity of the problem. One tool that has been developed to aid regulators in both deciding an appropriate course of action and to demonstrate the desired reductions in mobile emissions is EPA's Mobile 5a emission estimation model. In our study, Mobile 5a has been used to examine the effects of regulatory strategies, as applied to the Northeast United States, on vehicle emissions under worst-case ozone-forming conditions.
We examined the effects of the following mandatory and discretionary measures: inspection and maintenance (I/M), enhanced I/M, anti-tampering, reformulated gasolines (RFG I & 11), Federal Tier I & II vehicle standards, California's program of emission standards (LEV, ULEV, ZEV), Stage II refueling, and on-board vapor recovery (VRS). The rank order of effectiveness, for pollutant reduction, of these measures depends on the pollutant and the time period chosen. Two time periods are of interest, near-term (1993-2000) and far-term (2000-2010). In terms of non-methane organic gas (NMOG) emission reductions in the near-term, RFG I is the most effective measure followed by enhanced I/M and then regular I/M with less effectiveness attributable to the remaining programs. In the long-term the benefits from RFG I & II on NMOG emissions are still present; however, they are overshadowed by those from I/M programs and Tier I vehicles. The NOx situation is different due to the smaller benefit of reformulated gasolines on NOx emissions. In the short-term the largest benefits come from I/M programs with those from Tier I vehicles emerging by the year 2000. In the long-term regular I/M and Tier I vehicles are the most significant measures with fewer benefits from enhanced I/M. The results we obtain indicate that the adoption of the California vehicles in the Northeast instead of Tier I vehicles, with the other requirements of the 1990 CAAA, would not provide any emissions benefits before the year 2005. This is due, primarily to the reduced benefits of I/M assumed in Mobile 5a for California cars. In accordance with this result, the sensitivity of the aggregate fleet emissions to the possible phase-in date of the California cars is small.
A separate finding is that the in-use aggregate-fleet emissions of light-duty trucks are not attenuated by fleet rollover as substantially as those of the light-duty passenger cars. Additionally, the relative growth rate in vehicle miles traveled for light-duty trucks is much higher. Thus, the relative contribution of light-duty trucks to vehicle emissions is predicted to increase.
CitationFox, J., Heywood, J., and McRae, G., "Aggregate Vehicle Emission Estimates for Evaluating Control Strategies," SAE Technical Paper 940303, 1994, https://doi.org/10.4271/940303.
- National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 1992, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, November 1993.
- Bradley Michael, Executive Director of Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Remarks made at the “Scientific Basis for Ozone Control in the Northeast,” symposium July 28-30, 1993, Endicot House, Dedham, MA.
- 1990 Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
- Carlock, M. A., “Laboratory Tests of Modal Emission and Off-Cycle Corrections to FTP-75,” Transportation Planning and Air Quality, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 211, 1992.
- Environmental Protection Agency, User's manual for Mobile 5a, 1992.
- Pollack, A. K., Chinkin, L. R., et. al, “Assessment of Computer Models for Estimating Vehicle Emission Factors,” Volumes I, II, and III, Systems Applications International, 1991.
- Kelly, N. A., and Groblicki, P. J., “Real-World Emissions from a Modern Production Vehicle Driven in Los Angeles,” General Motors Research Publication GMR-7858, 1992.
- Haskew, H. M., and Liberty, T. F., “In-Use Emissions With Today's Closed-Loop Systems,” Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE 910339.
- Lawson, D. R., “Passing the Test'-Human Behavior and California's Smog Check Program,” Submitted to the Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, August 3, 1993.
- Ireson, R. G., Fieber, J. L., and Causley, M. C., “Generating Detailed Emissions Forecasts Using Regional Transportation Models: Current Capabilities and Issues,” Transportation Planning and Air Quality, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 142, 1992.
- Scheffe, R., Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Remarks made at the “Scientific Basis for Ozone Control in the Northeast,” symposium July 28-30, 1993, Endicot House, Dedham, MA.
- Fleet, C. R., and DeCorla-Souza, P., “VMT for Air Quality Purposes,” Transportation Planning and Air Quality, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 126, 1992.
- Argonne National Laboratory, “Forecast of Transportation Energy Demand Through the Year 2010,” Energy Systems Division, 1990.
- Brzezinski D. J., “Tech IV Credit Model: Estimates for Emission Factors and Inspection and Maintenance Credits for 1981 and Later Vehicles for MOBILE 3,” US. Environmental Protection Agency, October 1985.
- Browning, L. H., and Moyer, C. B., “Screening Study of Mobile Source Strategies for the Northeast,” Acurex Environmental Corporation, December 1992
- Wozniakowsky, H., “Average Case Complexity of Multivariate Integration,” Bulletin of American Mathematical Society, Vol. 24, 1, pp. 185-194, 1991.
- Halton, J. H., “On the Efficiency of Certain Quasi-Random Sequences of Points in Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Integrals,” Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 2, pp. 84-90, 1960.
- Allen, S., “Emission tests altered, say officials: Probe finds auto inspectors circumventing emission tests,” The Boston Globe, pp. 1, Thursday, September 23, 1993.