This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Vehicle Durability Testing Methods
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
It is a common practice throughout the vehicle manufacturing industry to perform full-scale durability tests on new model vehicles. Durability tests are initially conducted on prototype vehicles for design validation and then later, on production units to ensure it's structural integrity and to obtain data that can be used for future design improvements. In the case of commercial and transit vehicles, this information can be particularly useful for projecting it's minimum expected service life. Vehicle durability testing typically involves subjecting the vehicle to stress inducing inputs similar to those that would normally be encountered in an expected service environment. These inputs are applied to the vehicle at an accelerated rate to reduce the total testing time. Vehicle inputs for a durability test are imparted through either a test track or a mechanical road simulators such as four-post shakers. Each method has its advantages and limitations. For example, road simulators provide input flexibility in exchange for increased setup and programming time; test tracks allow the testing of several vehicles simultaneously without the benefit of a controlled laboratory environment. Both methods offer the advantage of accelerated life testing. However, in the opinion of the authors, the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are not clearly articulated in the published literature. This paper compares and contrasts these two methods of durability testing. Some of the basis of comparison includes: cost, maintenance, realism, time, flexibility to handle a variety of vehicles, measurement of inputs' effect, location of input, etc.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | On Fatigue Testing of Passenger Car Body Construction |
| Technical Paper | Application of Road Load Prediction Technique for Suspension Durability Input Condition |
Authors
Citation
Suresh, B., Klinikowski, D., and Gilmore, B., "Comparison of Vehicle Durability Testing Methods," SAE Technical Paper 932967, 1993, https://doi.org/10.4271/932967.Also In
References
- Smith, K.V. Stornant, R.F. “Cumulative Damage Approach to Durability Route Design” SAE Paper No. 791033 1979
- Murphy, R.W. “Endurance Testing of Heavy Duty Vehicles” The Twenty-Eighth L.Ray Buckendale Lecture SAE SP-506 1982
- Ashmore, C.S. Piersol, A.G. Witte, J.J. “Accelerated Service Life Testing of Automotive Vehicles on a Test Course” Vehicle System Dynamics 21 89 108 1992
- Belfiore, D. Wieczenski, D. Gilmore, B.J. Wambold, J.C. “Vehicle Axle Accelerations Due to Road Roughness for Accelerated Life Testing” SAE Paper No. 930256 1993
- Zell, K.D. “Overview of Advanced Road Simulation Techniques” SAE Paper No. 740946 1974
- Nolan, S.A. Linden, N.A. “Integrating Simulation Technology into Automotive Design Evaluation and Validation Processes” SAE Paper No. 871941 1987
- Grote, P. Fash, J. “Integration of Structural Dynamics Testing and Durability Analysis” Journal of Sound and Vibration 16 22 April 1987
- Leese, G.E. Mullin, R.L. “The Role of Fatigue Analysis in the Vehicle Test Simulation Laboratory” SAE Paper No. 910166 1991
- Barrowcliff, B.K. Ehlert, R.E. “Full Scale Road Simulated Endurance Test” SAE Paper No. 680148 1968
- Kilareski, W.P. Mason, J.M. Gittings, G. Antle, C. Wambold, J.C. Folmar, D. Brydia, R.E. “U.S.A Road Service and Use Characteristics Vol. III: Final Report” PTI 9029 April 1990
- Belfiore, D. Berger, E. “Acceleration Based Correlations” PTI Internal Report December 1992