This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Mathematical Modeling of Monolith Warmup Behavior in Variable-Fuel Vehicle Exhaust
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1993 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The transient, one-dimensional monolith model previously developed for gasoline emission control applications has been extended to study converter warmup behavior in the exhaust from a variable-fuel vehicle (VFV) running on mixtures of methanol and gasoline by including the catalytic oxidation of methanol which involves the formation of stable gaseous formaldehyde as a reaction intermediate. The model calculations show that the aldehyde formation increases gradually at the early stages of converter lightoff (when methanol conversions are low), peaks at ∼50% methanol conversion, and then declines rapidly with a further increase in methanol conversion. Consequently, for all cases of practical interest, the total amount of aldehyde produced during the converter warmup period correlates well with the time to converter lightoff, with lower aldehyde emissions predicted at faster converter lightoff.
In recent years methanol has received considerable attention as an alternative fuel for motor vehicles largely because of its potential for improving air quality in certain areas of the country [1, 2]. Conversion from gasoline to methanol would replace a large portion of the reactive hydrocarbons (HC) in gasoline exhaust with less reactive methanol, and thus can lower the ozone-forming potential of the exhaust. However, methanol-fueled vehicle exhaust also contains significant amounts of photochemically reactive aldehydes (primarily formaldehyde). Previous studies [2, 3 and 4] have clearly shown that maximum air quality benefit from methanol fuel can be obtained provided that exhaust emissions of formaldehyde are kept to very low levels. The California Air Resources Board has recently enacted a 15 mg/mile formaldehyde emission standard for methanol-fueled vehicles, and the requirement that this standard be met for at least 5 years or 50,000 miles of vehicle use presents a challenging emission control problem.
Given the prospect that methanol would not be uniformly available among service stations during the transition period, General Motors has developed and produced variable-fuel vehicles (VFVs) that can operate on mixtures of gasoline and methanol. This will allow the customer the flexibility to select either fuel based on price and availability. Variable-fuel vehicle exhaust contains a broad range of hydrocarbon species as well as unburned methanol and formaldehyde. Catalytic control of exhaust emissions from VFVs poses an interesting problem because many catalysts have been shown to exhibit tendencies to partially oxidize unburned methanol to formaldehyde at temperatures typically encountered during the converter warmup period [5, 6]. Thus, the ideal exhaust catalyst for VFVs must possess both high activity and high selectivity for the complete oxidation of methanol, in addition to the usual requirements related to the control of gasoline-derived exhaust pollutants.
This study was undertaken to mathematically analyze the emission performance characteristics of a monolithic catalytic converter operating in the exhaust environment of VFVs. We focus on the converter warmup period because the first few minutes after a cold start contribute up to 80% of the total exhaust emissions of HC, methanol, and formaldehyde collected over the FTP cycle . Since formaldehyde emissions are of particular concern with VFVs, the primary objective here is to identify important factors affecting formaldehyde emission levels and to gain insight into the mode of formaldehyde production over the catalyst during converter warmup. To this end, it is instructive to consider the simplest of transient inputs -- a cold converter subjected to a step change in inlet exhaust gas conditions. Such approximation, though an idealization of reality, captures the essential features of the converter warmup process and affords better understanding of the relationship between converter design/operating parameters and its cold-start emission performance. It is hoped that the understanding generated from this simulation study would aid in the development of monolithic converters which efficiently and selectively oxidize exhaust pollutants produced by VFVs.
CitationOh, S. and Bissett, E., "Mathematical Modeling of Monolith Warmup Behavior in Variable-Fuel Vehicle Exhaust," SAE Technical Paper 932721, 1993, https://doi.org/10.4271/932721.
SAE 1993 Transactions: Journal of Fuels & Lubricants
Number: V102-4; Published: 1994-09-01
Number: V102-4; Published: 1994-09-01
- Wilson K. W. McCormack M. C. “Methanol as an Ozone Control Strategy in the Los Angeles Area,” Proc. VI lntern. Symp. on Alcohol Fuels Tech.2 68 1984
- Harris J. N. Russell A. G. Milford J. B. “Air Quality Implications of Methanol Fuel Utilization,” SAE Paper 881198 1988
- Moses D. Saricks C. “A Review of Methanol Vehicles and Air Quality Impacts,” SAE Paper 872053 1987
- Russell A. G. Harris J. N. Milford J. B. “Quantitative Estimate of the Air Quality Impacts of Methanol Fuel Use,” Carnegie Mellon University, Report to the California Air Resources Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District under ARB Agreement A6-048-32 1989
- Thomas C. L. “Catalytic Processes and Proven Catalysts,” Academic Press New York 1970 208 209
- McCabe R. W. Mitchell P. J. “Exhaust- Catalyst Development for Methanol-Fueled Vehicles: 1. A Comparative Study of Methanol Oxidation over Alumina-Supported Catalysts Containing Group 9, 10, and 11 Metals,” Appl.Catal. 27 83 1986
- Lipari F. Williams R. L. Potter R. A. “Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Hydrocarbon Emissions from Methanol- and Gasoline-Fueled Vehicles,” J. Air & Waste Management Assoc. 40 747 1990
- Kuo J. C. W. Morgan C. R. Lassen H. G. “Mathematical Modeling of CO and HC Catalytic Converter Systems,” SAE Paper 710289 1971
- Voltz S. E. Morgan C. R. Liederman D. “Kinetic Study of Carbon Monoxide and Propylene Oxidation on Platinum Catalysts,” Ind.Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 12 294 1973
- Oh S. H. Cavendish J. C. “Mathematical Modeling of Catalytic Converter Lightoff. Part II:Model Verification by Engine-Dynamometer Experiments,” AlChE J. 31 935 1985
- Ismagilov Z. R. Dobrynkin N. M. Popovskii V. V. “Oxidation of Ethanol on Platinum/Alumina and Copper Oxide Catalysts,” React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 10 55 1979
- McCabe R. W. Mitchell P. J. “Oxidation of Ethanol and Acetaldehyde over Alumina-Supported Catalysts,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 22 212 1983
- McCabe R. W. McCready D. F. “Kinetics and Reaction Pathways of Methanol Oxidation on Platinum,” J. Phy. Chem. 90 1428 1986
- Lipari F. Colden F. L. “AIdehyde and Unburned Fuel Emissions from Developmental Methanol-Fueled 2.5L Vehicles,” SAE Paper 872051 1987
- Oh S. H. Cavendish J. C. “Transients of Monolithic Catalytic Converters: Response to Step Changes in Feedstream Temperature as Related to Controlling Automobile Emissions,” Ind. Eng.Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 21 29 1982
- McCabe R. W. “Exhaust- Catalyst Development for Methanol-Fueled Vehicles. III. Formaldehyde Oxidation,” Appl. Catal. 44 73 1988
- Newkirk M. S. Smith L. R. Ahuja M. Santoro S. Leonard J. “Formaldehyde Emission Control Technology for Methanol-Fueled Vehicles,” SAE Paper 902118 1990
- Bissett E. J. Oh S. H. “Mathematical Modeling of Electrically Heated Monolith Converters: Model Formulation and Numerical Methods,” GM Research Publication GMR-7582 January 1992
- Oh S. H. Bissett E. J. Battiston P. A. “Mathematical Modeling of Electrically Heated Monolith Converters: Experimental Verification of the Model,” September 1991
- Dalla R. A. Betta, R. C. “Relative Importance of Thermal and Chemical Deactivation of Noble Metal Automotive Oxidation Catalysts,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 15 169 1976
- Kim S. D'Aniello, M. J. Jr. “Electron Microscopy Study of a Rejuvenated Vehicle-Aged Automotive Exhaust Catalyst,” Appl. Catal. 56 45 1989
- Oh S. H. Cavendish J. C. “Design Aspects of Poison-Resistant Automobile Monolithic Catalysts,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 22 509 1983
- Windawi H. “Controlling the Exhaust Emissions from Alternative Fuel Vehicles,” Platinum Metals Rev. 36 185 1992
- Hellman K. H. Piotrowski G. K. Schaefer R. M. “Evaluation of Different Resistively Heated Catalyst Technologies,” SAE Paper 912382 1991
- Shelef M. Otto K. Otto N. C. “Poisoning of Automotive Catalysts,” Adv. Catal. 27 311 1978
- Krueger M. H. Monroe D. R. General Motors Research & Development Center Warren, MI 1991
- Hegedus L. L. Summers J. C. “Improving Automotive Catalysts' Tolerance to Poisoning,” 4th N. Am. Mtg. of Catal. Soc. Toronto February 1975
- McCabe R. W. King E. T. Watkins W. L. H. Gandhi H. S. “Laboratory and Vehicle Studies of Aldehyde Emissions from Alcohol Fuels,” SAE Paper 900708 1990
- Shah R. K. London A. L. “Laminar Flow Forced Convection Heat Transfer and Flow Friction in a Straight and Curved Ducts - A Summary of Analytical Solutions,” Technical Report No. 75 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University Stanford, CA 1971
- Nonnenmann M. “Metal Supports for Exhaust Gas Catalysts,” SAE Paper 850131 1985