This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessment of Cost and Training Effectiveness for a Candidate Training System Using the Comparison-Based Prediction Model
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The overall program objective was to identify, develop, and assess training requirements and system development methodologies that could be used to improve the instructional systems development (ISD) process to produce highly cost-effective training systems.
A specific cost and training effectiveness analysis (CTEA) model was applied to the design of a training system that was in the conceptual phase of development in order to (1) assess the utility of the selected model, and (2) evaluate the concept training system's potential effectiveness and cost. The information gained from this evaluation proved to be useful in making adjustments to the proposed design of a total training system during its design phase.
Recommended Content
Journal Article | Building Multiple Resolution Modeling Systems Using the High-Level Architecture |
Aerospace Standard | Spark Energy Measurement, Alternative Methods |
Aerospace Standard | Spark Energy Measurements Using Oscilloscopic Methods |
Topic
Citation
Babbitt, B., Semple, C., and Sparks, R., "Assessment of Cost and Training Effectiveness for a Candidate Training System Using the Comparison-Based Prediction Model," SAE Technical Paper 932598, 1993, https://doi.org/10.4271/932598.Also In
References
- Campbell D. T. Stanley J. C. 1972 Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research Chicago, IL Rand McNally & Co.
- Crowley P. A. Hanley M. Weinert C. Smith J. Hardy C Herschler D. Scheweikert K. 1986 Reconnaissance-Attack-Fighter Training Systems (RAFTS) preconcept investigations USAF, Aeronautical Systems Division Wright-Patterson AFB Contract No. F33615-83-C-01332, Task 15, Sequence No. 4
- Klein G. A. Johns P. G. Perez R. S. Mirabella A 1985 Comparision-based prediction of cost and effectiveness of training devices: A guidebook Alexandria, VA U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences