This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
An Analytical Method to Determine Vehicle Impact Speeds into Energy Absorbing Barrier End Treatments
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Often an accident reconstructionist is asked to determine vehicle speeds where the vehicle impacts a roadside object. One class of roadside objects that can be involved in the impact are the end treatment energy absorbing systems of “Jersey” barriers, guard rails and bridges. One such end treatment system is known as the Guard Rail Energy Absorbing Terminal, G-R-E-A-T. The G-R-E-A-T system consists of 6 to 8 foam and metal honeycomb cartridges surrounded by a framework of triple-corrugated steel guardrail. The number of cartridges used determine the maximum impact speed the barrier will safely handle. This type of accident cannot be analyzed as a fixed barrier impact.
A method has been developed to determine the impact speed of a vehicle that has hit a constant force ( constant deceleration ) energy absorbing end treatment system. By determining the distance the subject vehicle crushed the energy absorbing system and the mass of the subject vehicle, the impact speed of the subject vehicle can be determined. This involves the application of the work - energy principle. The method described involves the analysis of high speed films taken during certification testing of the energy absorption system to determine the impact speed of a subject vehicle.
Recommended Content
Citation
Ries, D., Kirk, J., and Plant, D., "An Analytical Method to Determine Vehicle Impact Speeds into Energy Absorbing Barrier End Treatments," SAE Technical Paper 930657, 1993, https://doi.org/10.4271/930657.Also In
References
- Shaw M.C. “Design for Safety: The Mechanical Fuse” Mechanical Engineering April 1972 22 29
- Kirk J. A. Overway N. “One Shot Shock Absorber” Machine Design October 20 1977 152 157
- Kirk J. A. “Design of a Metal Skinning Energy Absorber for the U. S. Capitol Subway System” Int. Journal Mech. Sci. 19 1977 595 602