This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Challenges in Crash Simulation Due to Emerging Safety Standards
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 01, 1993 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Automotive vehicle crash safety requirements have steadily become more stringent over the last decade. Automobiles of tomorrow have to comply with a host of requirements in various crash modes in order to be considered roadworthy. In the first section of the paper, the current major requirements, some important requirements that are imminent, and desirable requirements in the near future are briefly discussed.
Until recently, crash requirements have been focused mostly on the vehicle structure rather than the occupant protection, with the exception of frontal crash. Scarcity of in-depth interpretation of accident data, lack of biofidelic injury assessment devices (“crash dummies”) and the necessity for test repeatability had kept the testing procedures simple. Often, crash testing involved statically loading the vehicle to measure the structural strength, without consideration of the dynamic behavior of the structure or the structure/occupant interaction. But the technological gains in testing/instrumentation, advances in biomechanics leading to a better understanding of the injury mechanisms, availability of crash dummies, and the growing “safety” consciousness of the consumers have made the requirements increasingly more complex but realistic. With the increase in the complexity of the requirements, the complexity of the computer simulations has also increased. To simulate a crash test now requires the coupled simulation of the vehicle structure, barrier structure, restraint systems and the occupant surrogate. These advances, especially with respect to finite element methodologies, are discussed in the second section.
In the third section, a case study of a passive restraint is presented. Energy-absorbing knee bolsters are becoming popular along with airbags. In particular, the design considerations for knee bolsters are discussed. It is shown how transient, nonlinear finite element methods can be effectively utilized to design knee bolsters. Comparison of simulation results with those of sled tests are also presented.
CitationMani, A. and Krishnaswamy, P., "Challenges in Crash Simulation Due to Emerging Safety Standards," SAE Technical Paper 930209, 1993, https://doi.org/10.4271/930209.
- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) U.S.Department of Transportation Washington, D.C 1986
- Orlowski, K.F. Bundorf, R.T. Moffatt, E.A. “Rollover Crash Tests - The Influence of Roof Strength on Injury Mechanics.” SAE 851734
- DOT NHTSA “Side Impact Protection - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,”
- Baumann, K.H. Groesch, L. Holtze, H. Schwede, W. “Frontal Offset Crash Testing for Approximately 15 years: Results, Experiences and Consequences.” SAE 900413
- Naab, K.N. Stucki, S.L. “Development and Testing of Steering Assembly Countermeasures for Driver Impacts.” SAE 900546
- Wiechel, J.F. Guenther, D.A. “Review of Pedestrian Safety Research in the United States.” SAE 890757
- Lichtenberg, C.L. “Application of Radar for Automotive Crash Avoidance.” SAE 870496
- Warner, C.Y. Strother, C.E. James, M.B. Struble, D.E. Egbert, T.P. “Crash Protection in Near-side Impact - Advantages of a Supplemental Inflatable Restraint.” SAE 890602
- Clarke, R.M. Leasure W.A., Jr. “Truck Occupant Protection” DOT Report HD 908 081 December 1986
- “Dynamic Evaluation of Seat, Restraint Systems and Occupant Protection on Transport Airplanes,” Advisory Circular U.S. DOT March 1990
- Wierzbicki, T. “Development and Implementation of Special Elements for Crash Analysis,” SAE Transactions 97 880895 210
- Kurimoto, K. Taga, K. Matsumoto, H. Tsukiji, Y. “Simulation of Vehicle Crashworthiness and its Application,” 12th International Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles Gothenburg, Sweden May 29 June 2 1989
- Steyer, C. Diet, S. DuBois, P. “Numerical Simulation of the Proposed European Side Impact Test Procedure,” WAM ASME San Francisco, California Dec 10-15 1989
- MADYMO 3D User Manual TNO Road Vehicles Research Institute Delft, The Netherlands 1991
- Robbins, D.H. “Restraint Systems Computer Modeling and Simulation State of the Art and Correlation with Reality.” SAE 891976
- Pickett, A.K. Hoeck, H.G. Poth, A. Schrepfer, W. “Crashworthiness Analysis of a Full Automotive Rollover Test Using a Mixed Rigid Body and Explicit Finite Element Approach,” VDI Conference Wurzburg, W. Germany October 2-3 1990