This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Computer-Aided Accident Reconstruction: Its Role in Court
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
As the computer software which has lightened and enlightened the work of the accident reconstructionist over the past several years moves into the courtroom, a debate has sprung up concerning the appropriateness of this latest form of scientific evidence. Both its admissibility as evidence and its use as “demonstrative evidence” have been questioned. The primary purpose of this paper is to sort out the several different categories of computer applications which are frequently lumped together as “accident reconstruction software,” and then to distinguish on the basis of these categories the arguments regarding the courtroom use of data and images generated by this software.
The paper also contains an attempt-based on current judicial scrutiny of scientific evidence-to predict the ultimate consensus which will emerge regarding the evidentiary use of computer-aided accident reconstruction results. Finally, there is a brief review of the present judicial acceptance of such results among the various U.S. and Canadian jurisdictions.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Bohan, T., "Computer-Aided Accident Reconstruction: Its Role in Court," SAE Technical Paper 910370, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/910370.Also In
References
- Northwestern University P.O. Box 1409, Evanston, Illinois 60204
- Dynamics of Motorcycle Impact 1971-1973 1 Summary Report, Results of Crash Test Program and Computer Simulation 1973 Denver Research Institute for U.S. DOT NHTSA Burgett A. L. Monk M. W. Car-to-Car Side Impacts: Computer Crash Reconstruction SAE Paper No. 751154 McHenry R.R. Computer Aids for Accident Reconstruction SAE Paper No. 760776 Computer Simulation of the Effect of Cargo Shifting on Articulated Vehicles Performing Braking and Cornering Maneuvers 1 Executive Summary 1981 Johns Hopkins University Stucki S.L. Fitzpatrick M.U. Computer Model for Simulating an Unrestrained Driver in Frontal Collision SAE Paper No. 820469 Chi M. Vassoughi J. Engineering Aspect of Automobile Accident Reconstruction Using Computer Simulation J. Foren. Sci. 1985 Niederer P. Birchler B. Computer Assisted Single-View Photogrammetry for Accident Scene Documentation SAE Paper No. 850067 Martinez J.E. Computer Aided Automobile Accident Reconstruction-Theory, Graphics, Animation SAE Paper No. 850250 Day T.D. Hargens R.L. Differences Between EDCRASH and CRASH3 SAE Paper No. 850253 Woolley R.L. The IMPAC Computer Program for Accident Reconstruction SAE Paper No. 850254 Woolley R.L. Warner C.W. Tagg M.C. Inaccuracies in the CRASH3 Program SAE Paper No. 850255 Hight P.V. Lent-Koop D. Hight R.A. Barrier Equivalent Velocity, Delta V and CRASH3 Stiffness in Automobile Collisions SAE Paper No. 850437 Martinez E.J. Wallingford J.G. Computer Aided Accident Reconstruction of Tractor-Semitrailers SAE Paper No. 851529 Ishikawa H. Computer Simulation of Automobile Collision-Reconstruction of Accidents 851729 McHenry R.R. McHenry S.G. Revised Damage Analysis Procedure for the CRASH Computer Program SAE Paper No. 861894 Struble D.E. Generalizing CRASH3 for Reconstructing Specific Accidents SAE Paper No. 870041 Fonda A. Crash Extended for Desk and Handheld Computers 1987 SAE Paper No. 870044 Day T.D. Hargens R.L. Overview of the Way EDCRASH Computes Delta-V SAE Paper No. 870045 Cheng P.H. Sens M.J. Overview of the Evolution of Computer Assisted Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction SAE Paper No. 871991 Mustard J.D. Computers in Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction: A Review SAE Paper No. 871995 Wires C. Wiechel J. Guenther D. Animated Reconstruction of Automobile Collisions Using SMAC SAE Paper No. 880064 Day T.D. Hargens R.L. Personal Computer Program for Drawing Accident Sites SAE Paper No. 880068 Day T.D. Hargens R.L. Overview of the Way EDSMAC Computes Delta-V SAE Paper No. 880069 Woolley R.L. Warner C. Perl T. An Overview of Selected Computer Programs for Automotive Accident Reconstruction ransportation Research Record 1068 National Research Council 1986 Day T. Hargens R.L. Application and Misapplication of Computer Programs for Accident Reconstruction SAE Paper No. 890738 Pepe M.D. Sobek J.S. Huett G.J. Three Dimensional Computerized Photogrammetry and Its Application to Accident Reconstruction SAE Paper No. 890739 Day T.D. Hargens R.L. Further Validation of EDCRASH Using RICSAC Staged Collisions SAE Paper No. 890740 Reed W.S. Campbell A.T. Vehicle Collision Animation Employing Computer Graphics SAE Paper No. 890855 Thebert A.W. Computer Dimensioning of Skid Marks from Photographs ASME 1980 SAE/PT-89/34 The Use of Computers in Traffic Accident Reconstruction Topic 892 in Traffic Accident Investigation Manual NWU Traffic Institute Evanston, Illinois 1989 Kumar A. CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformulation for Front and Rear Collisions SAE Paper No. 900098 Strother C.E. Woolley R.L. James M.B. A Comparison Between NHTSA Crash Test Data and CRASH3 Frontal Stiffness Coefficients SAE Paper No. 900101 Day T.D. Hargens R.L. Further Validation of EDSMAC Using the RICSAC Staged Collisions SAE Paper No. 900102 Happian-Smith J. Macaulay M.A. Chinn B.P. Computer Simulation of A Simple Motorcycle in Glancing Impacts with a Rigid Barrier 1990 SAE Paper No. 900754
- Dombroff M. Demonstrative Evidence Trial March 1982 52 Harper T. Computer Evidence is Coming ABA Journal November 1984 80 Chaney E.M. Computer Simulations: How They Can Be Used at Trial and the Arguments for Admissibility Ind. L.J. 1986 Schaefer C.C. Messina J.L. Bollard R.J.H. Computer Simulations in Court Trial July 1987 69 Pinos T. Catania P. Computer-aided demonstrative evidence Law Inst. J. (Aus.) Jan/Feb 1988 84 Turley W. Effective Use of Demonstrative Evidence Trial September 1989 62 Kaufman C. Technology at Trial Tex. Bar J. Marcotte P. The Final Minutes of Delta 191 ABA Journal December 1989 52 Setterberg F. Roger Rabbit Goes to Court Calif. Lawyer 1990
- Car Accidents Yield to Computer Analysis The New York Times September 20 1988 C1
- into
- Frye v United States D.C. Cir. 1923
- Chaney E.M.
- Setterberg F.
- Computer Simulations in Court Schaefer C.C. Messina J. L. Bollard R.J.H. Trial Magazine July 1987 69 74 Technology at Trial Tex. Bar J. 1050 1053 1989
- General Motors Brelin J.M. Cichowski W.G. Holcomb M.P Photogrammetric Analysis Using the Personal Computer SAE Paper No. 861416
- 1984 Damask A.C. Forensic physics of vehicle accidents Physics Today March 1987 2 Paskin Arthur Harper T. Computer Evidence is Coming ABA Journal November 1984 80 McHugh
- McHugh
- RABBIT ROGER
- Scientific Evidence Jurimetric J. 1984
- Starr v Campos 2d 1982
- Perma Research and Development v Singer Co. 1976
- A Practitioner's Primer on Computer-Generated Evidence U.Chi.L.Rev. 1974
- Perma U.Chi.L.Rev. 1974
- Connors v U.S. 1990 Marcotte
- Norman C. Maine Case Deals Blow to DNA fingerprinting Science December 1989 1556