This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Material Alternatives for the Automotive Crankshaft; A Competitive Assessment Based on Manufacturing Economics
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The automotive crankshaft, one of the more metal intensive components in the engine, provides an attractive opportunity for the use of alternate materials and processing routes. Although performance requirements are important in the choice of a particular material or fabrication route, the final decision is usually dictated by cost.
This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of various material alternatives for the crankshaft. The technique of “Technical Cost Modeling” was utilized to estimate the manufacturing costs of the various material alternatives. Four processing routes for the manufacture of the automotive crankshaft were evaluated: steel forging, nodular casting, microalloy forging and austempered ductile iron casting.
The results indicate that although nodular cast iron is the most widely used material today, it appears that, with changing engine design, microalloyed steel can effectively compete in this application. Further, given a choice between forging or casting-and-heat-treating, engineers would rather forge a crankshaft, if performance exceeding that of nodular cast iron is necessary. This is mainly attributed to the current processing problems with austempered ductile iron (ADI), which make it a very unattractive choice for crankshafts, especially when enhanced properties can be more cost effectively achieved with microalloyed steel. The primary attractiveness of steel forgings is that they offer better specific performance in this application, which current designs do NOT exploit. Suppliers should promote forged crankshaft designs which offer components with lower weights than cast crankshafts. Any process improvements which would reduce machining requirements could have a major impact upon finished part cost in this application.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Nallicheri, N., Clark, J., and Field, F., "Material Alternatives for the Automotive Crankshaft; A Competitive Assessment Based on Manufacturing Economics," SAE Technical Paper 910139, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/910139.Also In
References
- Predicasts: Basebook 1987 Predicasts 112 July 15 1988
- Nallicheri N.V. Clark J.P. Field F.R. “A Technical & Economic Analysis of Alternate Manufacturing Processes for the Connecting Rod” Proceedings, International Conference on Powder Metallurgy Pittsburgh May 1990
- Busch J.V. Field F.R. “Technical Cost Modeling” Blow Molding Handbook Donald Rosato Dominick V. Hanser Publishers 1989 839 870
- Busch J.V. “Technical Cost Modeling of Plastics Fabrications Processes” Department of Material Science and Engg. M.I.T. Cambridge 1987
- Poggiali B. “Production Cost Modeling: A Spreadsheet Methodology” Department of Materials Science and Engg. M.I.T. 1985
- Ng L.H. Field F.R. III “Technical Cost Modeling for PCB Fabrication” PC Fabrication March 1989
- Arnold S. “Multi-Sequential Process Modeling: A Study of Doors” Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 1989
- Parks L.R. “Austempered Irons and the Automotive Industry” Metals and Materials 11 1 Jan. 1985 5354
- Lakhtin Yu. Engineering Physical Metallurgy and Heat Treatment Mir Publishers Moscow 1979 249 250
- Vaccari J.A. “Why the Interest in ADI Castings” American Machinist September 1989 57 62
- Tarajos J.M. Schneider A.K. “Austempered Ductile Iron Single Point Turning Machinability Evaluation” Mechanical Working and Steel Processing Proceedings 1988 103 112
- Stokes M.D. “A Test of Metal” Autoweek February 20 1989 20 21
- Versical D. “Hot Cars Scarce” Automotive News December 26 1988 1