This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
An Economic Assessment of Alternative Manufacturing Processes for the Camshaft
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
As material, labor, and energy costs have increased, there has been a growing need to look for more cost effective processing methods to manufacture engineering components. A study was undertaken to assess the competitive position of alternative processing routes for high volume production of the automotive camshaft.
The techniques employed in the course of the study were Technical Cost Modeling and Multi-At-tribute Utility Analysis (MAUA). The use of cost modeling and attribute analysis offers a novel system-based approach to treating the problem of materials substitution. A computerized spreadsheet is used for writing the model, which simulates the cost of the manufacturing process. MAUA, a decision analysis technique that has been successfully applied to materials selection problems, helps clarify the importance of critical performance attributes to the materials selection problem for a given application, and then helps rank the materials based on their acceptability.
The automotive camshaft was chosen as a case study to demonstrate the use of these techniques. Five different production scenarios were evaluated: nodular casting, steel forging, microalloy forging, a hybrid process (segmented camshaft) using a hollow steel tube with forged lobes held in place by hydraulic expansion of the tube, and the fully machined camshaft. The study showed a close dependence of material/processing route choice with production volume. The results indicate that changes in engine design and movement toward faster and higher performance engines holds promise for steel forgings as the material of choice for this application.
Recommended Content
Citation
Nallicheri, N., Clark, J., and Field, F., "An Economic Assessment of Alternative Manufacturing Processes for the Camshaft," SAE Technical Paper 901741, 1990, https://doi.org/10.4271/901741.Also In
References
- Nallicheri N.V. Clark J.P. Field F.R. “A Technical & Economic Analysis of Alternate Manufacturing Processes for the Connecting Rod,” Proceedings, International Conference on Powder Metallurgy Pittsburgh May 1990
- Busch J.V. Field F.R. “Technical Cost Modeling,” Blow Molding Handbook Donald Rosato Dominick V. Hanser Publishers 1989 839 870
- Field F.R., III de Neufville R. “Materials Selection - Maximizing Overall Utility,” Metals & Materials June 1988 378 382
- Thurston D.L. “Multi-Attribute Utility Analysis of Materials Selection Decisions,” Ph.D. Thesis June 1987 Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA.
- Keeny R.L. Raiffa H. Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs John Wiley & Sons NY 1976
- Henning J. Forging Institute of America Private Communication December 1989
- “Method of Fastening Drive Elements of a Hollow Shaft,” United States Patent No. 4,750,250.
- Brochures of Presta Someflor
- Morand D. CPC Base City Private Communication January 1990
- Turkish M.C. Valve Gear Design Waveriy Press Baltimore, Maryland 1946
- Barr A.C. Chrysler Corporation Private Communication June 1989
- Lugasi R. Barouel M. Cook J. “Assembled Camshaft for I.C. Engines With Forged Powder Lobes,” SAE Paper No. 870129