This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Perspective on Side Impact Occupant Crash Protection
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The NHTSA notices of proposed rulemaking on side impact protection have focused worldwide attention on one of the most difficult and frustrating efforts in automobile crash safety. Traditional vehicle design has evolved obvious structural contrasts between the side of the struck vehicle and the front of the striking vehicle. Protection of near-side occupants from intruding door structure is a most perplexing engineering challenge. Much useful and insightful engineering work has been done in conjunction with NHTSA's proposed rulemaking. However, there are many major engineering issues which demand further definition before reasonable side impact rulemaking test criteria can be finalized.
This paper reviews recent findings which characterize the human factors, biomechanics, and occupant position envelope of the typical side impact crash victim. It discusses economic benefit and cost relationships which appear to put side impact crash protection about an order of magnitude less favorable than frontal protection. The findings of a companion paper regarding the effect of accident reconstruction errors on side impact benefit appraisal are employed to analyze the safety community's inability to measure the effect of countermeasures in practice. The proposal advanced in a second companion paper for a simplified crash test procedure is reviewed, as it pertains to the generation of side impact crush energy data, and its contribution to understanding and designer judgement regarding the efficacy of various countermeasures and overall economic savings.
Suggestions are advanced for improvements needed in test procedures and field accident data-gathering to permit economical achievement and measurement of realistic reductions in side impact injury. Recommendations are also made for the improvement of the side impact reconstruction process employed by the NASS field accident investigators, including a proposal for government/industry cooperative efforts in creating and maintaining a substantially enlarged crush energy data base to serve the future needs of NASS.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | The Assessment of the Societal Benefit of Side Impact Protection |
Ground Vehicle Standard | Occupant Restraint System Evaluation - Lateral Rollover System-Level Heavy Trucks |
Journal Article | Moving Deformable Barrier Test Procedure for Evaluating Small Overlap/Oblique Crashes |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Warner, C., James, M., and Strother, C., "A Perspective on Side Impact Occupant Crash Protection," SAE Technical Paper 900373, 1990, https://doi.org/10.4271/900373.Also In
References
- Carter, R. L. “Passive Protection at 50 Miles Per Hour,” U.S. Department of Transportation NHTSA June 1972
- NHTSA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Revise Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 214 - Side Impact Protection 53 17 January 27 1988
- NHTSA Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Revise Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 214 - Side Impact Protection 53 161 August 19 1988
- NHTSA Office of Regulatory Analysis, Plans, and Policies “Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis-Side impact FMVSS 214,” January 1988
- NHTSA “Fatal Accident Reporting System 1982,” DOT HS 806566 U.S.Dept Transportation Washington, D.C. 1984
- The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute March 1989
- Strother, C. Smith, G. James, M. Warner, C. “injury and Intrusion in Side Impacts and Rollovers,” February 1984 SAE 840403
- Warner, Charles Y. et al “Application of Kinematic Concepts to Side Impact Injury Analysis,” SAE Winter Annual Meeting February 1990
- Viano, D. et al “Involvement of Older Drivers in Multi-vehicle Side Impact Crashes,” 2 October 24 1988
- Viano, D. “Estimates of Fatal Chest and Abdominal Injury Prevention by Side Impact Improvements,” General Motors submission to FMVSS 214 Docket 1988
- Langwieder, K. “Passenger Injuries in Collisions and Their Relation to General Speed Scale,” 17th STAPP 1 SAE 730963 November 12-13 1973
- Viano, D. et al “Biomechanics of the Human Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Lateral Impact,” Pro. Assn. for Advancement of Automotive Medicine Baltimore October 1989
- Huelke, D. “Side Impacts to the Passenger Compartment--Clinical Studies from Field Accident Investigations,” SAE 890379 February 27 March 3 1989
- Chandler, E. M. “Car-To-Car Compatibility,” Section 4, Part 2, Fourth International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles Kyoto, Japan March 13 16 1973
- “Technical Specification, U.S. intermediate ESV,” NHTSA Washington, D.C. 1972
- Hackney, J. et al “Update of the NHTSA Research Activity in Thoracic Side Impact Protection for the Front Seat Occupant,” SAE 872207 1987
- Fan, W.R.S. “Two New Areas Concerning Side Impact Protection for Passenger Car Occupants,” SAE 871114 May 1987
- Cesari, D. Dolivet, C. “What Can Be Expected From Side Impact Standards,” SAE 890375
- Hackney, J.R. Monk, M.W. Hollowell, W.T. Sullivan, L.K. Willke D.T. “Results of the NHTSA's Thoracic Side Impact Research Program,” SAE Paper 830463 February 1983
- Risteen, W.H. “Report on the Development of the Initial Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards,” U.S. Department of Commerce National Traffic Safety Agency January 31 1967 Washington, D.C.
- NHTSA Federal Register Feb. 3 1967
- NHTSA October 30 1970
- Morrall, J.F. III “A Review of the Record,” November December 1986 30 Souleles 1987 (27)
- Kahane, C.J. “An Evaluation of Side Structure Improvements in Response to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 214,” DOT HS 806 314 November 1982
- Parsons, G. “Evaluation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 301-75, Fuel System Integrity: Passenger Cars,” NHTSA Washington, D.C. January 1983
- NHTSA “Societal Costs of Motor Vehicle Accidents, Preliminary Report,” U.S. Dept. of Transportation Washington, D.C. May 1972
- Faigin, B. “Societal Costs of Motor Vehicle Accidents for Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Perspective on the Major Issues and Some Recent Findings,” Fourth International Congress on Automotive Safety July 1975
- NHTSA “The Economic Cost to Society of Motor Vehicle Accidents,” U.S. Dept. of Transportation DOT HS 806342 1983
- Souleles, N.S. SAE Paper No. 872530
- Section 2(b), Executive Order No. 12291 of February 17,1981 “Federal Regulation,” Regulatory Program of the United State's Government: April 1, 1987 -March 31, 1988 Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget June 1987 601
- Regulatory Program of the United States Government: April 1, 1986 - March 31, 1987 Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget 1986 xii
- Braymen, A. “Impact Intrusion Characteristics of Fuel Systems,” Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory Buffalo, NY April 1970
- Strother, Charles E. et al “Aspects of the Assessment of Societal Benefits Associated with Side Impact Counte *measures,” Final Report Submitted to General Motors February 3 1989
- Strother, C. et al “The Assessment of the Societal Benefit of SideImpact Protection,” SAE Winter Annual Meeting Detroit February 1990
- NHTSA “Planning for Safety Priorities 1983 Safety Priorities Plan,” DOT HS 806399, NHTSA Washington, D.C. April 1983
- Nash, C.E. “CRASH3: Current Status,” SAE 870040 February 11 1987
- Patel, K.P. “CRASH3 Model Reformulation-- Frontal Collisions,” VRTC-0053 NHTSA-Ohio February 1989
- NHTSA “National Accident Sampling System - A Report on Traffic Crashes and Injuries in the United States 1986,” DOTHS 807296 U.S. Deptof Transportation 1988
- Woolley, R.L. Oral Presentation at Accident Reconstruction Session SAE Passenger Car Meeting Dearborn, Ml 1987
- Warner, Charles Y. Results of CSE in-house research on crush energy reconstruction parameters 1990
- Stern, Seymore Personal Communication to Charles Y.Warner April 21 1984
- MVMA, “Manufacturers Motor Vehicle Specifications,” 1989 version, MVMA Detroit, MI 1989
- Stocke, James Personal Communication to Charles Y.Warner February 1989
- Volpe Chrysler v. U.S. Sixth Distric Court of Appeals et al 1972