This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Boundary-Layer Stability Analysis of NLF and LFC Experimental Data at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Boundary-layer stability analyses of experimental data obtained in two recent NASA-Langley wind tunnel experiments and a Cessna flight test are presented. These experiments were designed to test the state-of-the-art in natural-laminar-flow (NLF) and laminar-flow-control (LFC) airfoils for subsonic and transonic applications. The NLF(1)-0414F was tested at subsonic speeds in the Langley Low-Turbulence Pressure Tunnel and in flight on a modified Cessna 210 aircraft. The SCLFC(1)-0513F airfoil was tested on a swept wing at both subsonic and transonic speeds in the Langley 8-Foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel. These experiments have demonstrated that an appreciable amount of laminar flow is attainable on general aviation and transport-type lifting surfaces with a consequential reduction in drag. The amplification of small disturbances by linear processes on such surfaces can be due to Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) and/or crossflow (CF) mechanisms. This study consists of the examination of these two instabilities by both the commonly used incompressible (SALLY and MARIA) method and the more involved compressible (CQSAL) method. These experiments provide a wide range of experimental test conditions for transition correlation. Hot-film gages were used to determine the transition locations for the range of test cases. It was found that the incompressible TS transitional n-factors were generally in the range of 9 to 12 In agreement with earlier correlation studies. The TS instability was determined to be the dominant instability mode on the swept LFC model over the entire range of test conditions. The incompressible TS correlated n-factors remained essentially constant as Mach number was increased up to 0.82, but the compressible TS n-factors were found to decrease with Mach number from 9 to 12 at low Mach numbers down to approximately 5 to 7 at M∞ = 0.82.
Recommended Content
Citation
Berry, S., Dagenhart, J., Viken, J., and Yeaton, R., "Boundary-Layer Stability Analysis of NLF and LFC Experimental Data at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds," SAE Technical Paper 871859, 1987, https://doi.org/10.4271/871859.Also In
References
- Smith A. M. O. Gamberoni N. Transition, Pressure Gradient, and Stability Theory Proc. Int. Congress Appl. Mech., 9 Brussels 4 1956
- Van Ingen J. L. A Suggested Semi-Empirical Method for the Calculation of the Boundary-Layer Transition Region Report No. VTK71, VTH74 Delft, Holland 1956
- Pfenninger W. Laminar Flow Control Laminarization Special Course on Concepts for Drag Reduction, AGARD-R-654 June 1977 3-1 3-75
- Srokowski A. J. Orszag S. A. Mass Flow Requirements for LFC Wing Design AIAA Paper 77-1222 Aug. 1977
- Hefner J. N. Bushnell D. M. Application of Stability Theory to Laminar Flow Control AIAA Paper 79-1493 July 1979
- Viken J. K. Aerodynamic Design Considerations and Theoretical Results for a High-Reynolds-Number Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil Master's Thesis George Washington University Jan. 1983
- McGhee R. J. Viken J. K. Pfenninger W. Beasley W. D. Harvey W. D. Experimental Results for a Flapped Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil with High Lift/Drag Ratio NASA TM 85788 May 1984
- Murri D. G. Jordan F. L., Jr. Wind-Tunnel Investigation of a General Aviation Airplane Equipped with a High Aspect-Ratio, Natural-Laminar-Flow Wing SAE Paper 871019 April 1987
- Befus J. Nelson E. R. Ellis D. R. Latas J. Flight Test Investigation of a Wing Designed for Natural Laminar Flow SAE Paper 871044 April 1987
- Harvey W. D. Pride J. D. The NASA Langley Laminar Flow Control Experiment AIAA Paper 82-0567 Mar. 1982
- Dagenhart J. R. Amplified Crossflow Disturbances in the Laminar Boundary Layer on Swept Wings with Suction NASA TP 1902 Nov. 1981
- Malik M. R. Orszag S. A. Efficient Computation of the Stability of Three-Dimensional Compressible Boundary Layers AIAA Paper 81-1277 June 1981
- Pfenninger W. Reed H. L. Dagenhart J. R. Design Considerations of Advanced Supercritical Low-Drag Suction Airfoils Symposium on Viscous Drag Reduction Nov. 7-8, 1979 Dallas, Texas
- Allison D. O. Dagenhart J. R. Two Experimental Supercritical Laminar-Flow-Control Swept-Wing Airfoils NASA TM 89073 Feb. 1987
- Berry S. A. Incompressible Boundary-Layer Stability Analysis of LFC Experimental Data for Sub-Critical Mach Numbers NASA CR 3999 July 1986
- Berry S. A. Brooks C. W. Dagenhart J. R. Harris C. D. Boundary-Layer Stability Analysis of NASA-Langley 8-Ft. TPT LFC Experimental Data Natural Laminar Flow and Laminar Flow Control Symposium Hampton, VA March, 1987
- Kaups K. Cebeci T. Compressible Laminar Boundary Layers with Suction on Swept and Tapered Wings J. Aircraft 14 7 July 1977 661 667
- Harris C. D. September 1987
- Harvey W. D. Boundary-Layer Control for Drag Reduction First International Pacific Air and Space Technology Conference Nov. 13-17, 1987 Melbourne, Australia
- Lin C. C. The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability Cambridge Univ. Press London New York 1955