This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Vehicle Refueling and Evaporative Emission Control Methods for Long-Term Hydrocarbon Control Progress
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency is studying the merits of four strategies to reduce hydrocarbon emissions from motor vehicles. The four strategies include onboard control of vehicle refueling emissions. Stage II controls on service stations, tightening of existing vehicle evaporative control regulations, and restrictions on gasoline volatility. In this paper, emissions reductions and costs projected for each strategy will be compared. Of the four strategies, onboard refueling controls on new cars would be the most effective in reducing nationwide hydrocarbon emissions; however, the incremental emission reduction would be relatively small compared with future reductions from controls already in place.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Schleyer, C. and Koehl, W., "A Comparison of Vehicle Refueling and Evaporative Emission Control Methods for Long-Term Hydrocarbon Control Progress," SAE Technical Paper 861552, 1986, https://doi.org/10.4271/861552.Also In
References
- United States Environmental Protection Agency “Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) Regulatory Analysis Air Quality Data Base, 1982-1984,” Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC 1986
- United States Environmental Protection Agency “Evaluation of Air Pollution Regulatory Strategies for Gasoline Marketing Industry,” Washington, D. C. 1984
- United States Environmental Protection Agency “Study of Gasoline Volatility and Hydrocarbon Emissions from Motor Vehicles,” Ann Arbor, MI 1985
- Koehl, W. J. Lloyd, D. W. McCabe, L. J. “Onboard Control of Refueling Emissions -System Demonstration on a 1985 Vehicle,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 861551 October 1986
- Radian Corp. “Analysis of Selected Issues Regarding Stage II Vapor Control Systems for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,” October 23 1985
- Engineering Science “D. C. Gasoline Station Inspections to Assure Compliance with Stage II VGC Vapor Recovery Requirements,” January 11 1985
- American Petroleum Institute “A Study of the Effect of Gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) on the Evaporative and exhaust Emissions from In-Use Vehicles,” Washington, D. C. 1985
- American Petroleum Institute “Comments Before the Environmental Protection Agency on Gasoline Volatility and Vehicle Hydrocarbon Emissions,” Washington, D. C. March 27 1986
- MOBILE3 Users Manual, United States Environmental Protection Agency “Users Guide to MOBILE3,” Office of Mobile Sources Ann Arbor, MI 1984
- General Motors Corporation U. S. Environmental Protection Agency “Evaluation of Mr Pollution Regulatory Strategies for Gasoline Marketing Industry,” November 8 1984
- Bonner and Moore Management Science “Estimated Refinery Cost Impact of Reduced Gasoline Vapor Pressure - Draft Final Report,” Houston, IX 1985
- Bonner and Moore Management Science “Estimated Refining Cost Impact of Reducing Gasoline Vapor Pressure,” Supplemental Report Houston, TX 1985
- New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection “Proposed New Jersey State Implementation Plan Revision for the Attainment and Maintenance of Ozone and Carbon Monoxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards,” Trenton, NJ September 1983
- Bonner and Moore Management Science “Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Gasoline Vapor Pressure Reduction for Ozone Attainment in Maryland,” Maryland Petroleum Council 1986
- Hochhauser, A. M. “An Experimental Study of Vehicle Refueling Emissions,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper 760307 1976
- Stebar, R. F. Martens, S. W. Benson, J. D. Brinkman, N. D Dunker. A. M. Sapre, A. R. Schwing, R. C. “Gasoline Vapor Pressure Reduction-An Option for Cleaner Air,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Fuels and Lubricants Annual Meeting Tulsa, OK 1985
- Wolcott, M. A. Darlington, T. L. “MOBILE3 - Updated Mobile Source Emission Factors,” Air Pollution Control Association Annual Meeting Detroit June 1985
- General Motors Testimony, Public Rearing on EPA “Study of Gasoline Volatility and HC Emissions from Motor Vehicles,” February 4 1986
- Ingamells, J. C. “Fuel Economy and Cold Start Driveability with Some Recent-Model Cars,” SAE No. 74032 1974
- Wolcott, M. A. Kahlbaum, D. F. “MOBILE3 Fuel Consumption Model,” CSC February 1985