This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Co2 Reduction Process - Bosch and Sabatier
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published July 01, 1985 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Among several technologies known for reducing carbon dioxide (CO2), the Sabatier and Bosch processes are the two primary options being considered for application in a regenerable Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) aboard the projected Space Station. Both processes reduce CO2 by catalytic reaction with hydrogen (H2) and enable the recovery of the metabolically consumed oxygen (O2). The Bosch process produces carbon and water while the Sabatier process produces methane and water. While the technologies involved with these processes are different, each must interface with similar subsystems of a regenerable ECLSS. This paper presents a comparison between the two competing technologies and includes the design and sizing of the respective reactors and other subsystem components for the Space Station application. The analysis includes comparison of process characteristics and identification of assumptions and ground rules, with particular attention given to defining subsystem boundaries. For a given technique, all the hardware required to reduce CO2 to a specified level fall within these boundaries. The analysis determines total equivalent weight, which includes fixed hardware weight and weight penalties for power and heat rejection requirements. Data for the subsystems were acquired through NASA and other published sources. This paper also examines the various merits of the Bosch and Sabatier CO2 reduction subsystems, including the advantages and disadvantages and operational impacts of both.
|Technical Paper||Optimization of the Bosch CO2 Reduction Process|
|Technical Paper||An Experimental Study of the Bosch and the Sabatier CO2 Reduction Processes|
|Technical Paper||Maturity of the Bosch Co2 Reduction Technology for Space Station Application|
CitationSpina, L. and Lee, M., "Comparison of Co2 Reduction Process - Bosch and Sabatier," SAE Technical Paper 851343, 1985, https://doi.org/10.4271/851343.
- Samonski, F. H. and Neel, J. M., “Atmosphere Revitalization for Manned Spacecraft - An Assessment of Technology Readiness,” 24th IAF Congress, Baku, USSR; October, 1973.
- Quattrone, P. D., “Spacecraft Oxygen Recovery System,” Astronautics Acta, Vol. 18, No. 4; October, 1973; pp. 261-272.
- Holmes, R. F.; King, C. D. and Keller, E. E., “Bosch CO2 Reduction System Development,” Interim Report, GDCA-DBD73-0001, Contract NAS8-27276, Convair Division of General Dynamics, San Diego, CA; January, 1973.
- King, D. D. and Holmes, R. F., “A Mature Bosch CO2 Reduction Technology,” Paper No. 76-ENAs-14, Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA; July, 1976.
- Kostell, G. D.; Schubert, F. H.; Shumar J. W.; Hallick, T. M. and Jensen, F.C., “Six-Man, Self-Contained Carbon Dioxide Concentrator Subsystem for Space Station Prototype (SSP) Application,” Final Report, Contract NAS2-6478, CR-114742, Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH; May, 1974.
- Wynveen, R. A.; Schubert, F. H.; Kostell, G. D.; Hallick, T. M. and Quattrone, P. D., “Electrochemical Concentration of Carbon Dioxide Aboard Spacecraft,” Paper No. 74-109, International Astronautical Federation Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Sept. 30 to October 5, 1974.
- Schubert, F. H., “A Study of the Integration of the Electrochemical Depolarized Carbon Dioxide Concentrator and the Bosch Carbon Dioxide Reduction Subsystem,” Final Report, Contract NAS8-29623, ER-185-4, Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH; June, 1974.
- Schubert, F. H.; Wynveen, R. A., and Hallick, T. M., “Integration of the Electrochemical Depolarized CO2 Concentrator with the Bosch CO2 Reduction Subsystem,” Final Report, Contract NAS8-30891, Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH; March, 1976.
- Schubert, F. H.; Wynveen, R. A. and Jensen, F. C., “Development of an Advanced Static Feed Water Electrolysis Module,” Paper No. 75-ENAs-30, Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Francisco, CA; July, 1975.
- Heppner, D. B.; Hallick, T. M. and Schubert, F. H., “Integrated Operation of a Bosch-Based Oxygen Recovery System,” Final Report, Contract NAS8-30891, Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH; September, 1977.
- Manning, M. P. and Reid, R. C., “CO2 Reduction by the Bosch Process,” Paper No. 75-ENAs-22, Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Francisco, CA; July, 1975.
- Sacco, A.; Manning, M. P. and Reid, R. C., “The Effect of H2 O/H2 and CO2 /CO Ratios on the Reduction of CO2 in the Bosch Process,” Paper No. 76-ENAs-7, Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA; July, 1976.
- Garmirian, J. E.; Manning, M. P. and Reid, R. C., “The Use of Nickel and Cobalt Catalysts in a Bosch Reactor,” Paper No. 80-ENAs-15, Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA; July, 1980.
- Manning, M. P.; Reid, R. C. and Sophon-panich, C., “Carbon Deposition in the Bosch Process with Ruthenium and Ruthenium - Iron Alloy Catalysts,” Final Grant Report, Contract NAG2-90, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; July, 1982.
- Verostko, C. E. and Forsythe, R. K., “A Study of the Sabatler Methanation Reaction,” Paper No. 740933, Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, Seattle, WA; July, 1974.