Analytical Study of Three-Surface Lifting Systems

Authors

• Kamran Rokhsaz - University of Missouri-Rolla Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engrg.
• Bruce P. Selberg - University of Missouri-Rolla Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engrg.

Topic

• Drag
• Aircraft
• Canards
• Pressure

Citation

Also In

References

1. Rutan, B. “Development of Small High-Aspect-Ratio Canard Aircraft,” The Society of Experimental Test Pilots 15 2 1980
2. Rutan, B. “Tale of the Three EZ's,” Sport Aviation 29 2 Feb. 1980
3. Nayor, C. H. “Notes on the Induced Drag of a Wing-Tail Combination,” R&M 2528 1954
4. Laitone, E. V. “Ideal Tail Load for Minimum Aircraft Drag,” Jnl. of Aircraft 15 3 March 1978
5. Laitone, E. V. “Positive Tail Loads for Minimum Induced Drag of Subsonic Aircraft,” Jnl. of Aircraft 15 12 December 1978
6. Laitone, E. V. “Prandtl's Bi-Plane Theory Applied to Canard and Tandem Aircraft,” Jnl. of Aircraft 17 4 April 1980
7. Prandtl, L. “Applications of Modern Hydrodynamics to Aeronautics,” NACA Rep. #116 1921
8. Prandtl, L. “Induced Drag of Multi-Planes,” NACA Tech. Note #182 1924
9. Munk, Max. M. “The Minimum Induced Drag of Aerofoils,” NACA Report #121 1921
10. Munk, Max M. “General Bi-Plane Theory,” NACA Report #151 1922
11. McLaughlin, Milton D. “Calculations and Comparison With an Ideal Minimum of Trimmed Drag for Conventional and Canard Configurations Having Various Levels of Static Stability,” NASA Tech. Note, TN D-8391 May 1977
12. Keith, M. W. Selberg, B. P. “Aerodynamic Optimization, Comparison, and Trim Design of Canard and Conventional High Performance General Aviation Configurations,” presented at AIAA 21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting Reno, Nevada January 1983
13. Kendall, E. R. “The Minimum Induced Drag, Longitudinal Trim and Static Longitudinal Stability of Two-Surface and Three-Surface Airplanes,” AIAA 2nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference August 1984
14. Rokhsaz, K. “Analytical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Dual Wing Systems,” Rolla, Mo. 1980
15. Thwaites, B. “Approximate Calculation of the Laminar Boundary Layer,” Aero. Quarterly I 1949
16. Michel, R. “Etude de la Transition sur les Profiles d'Aile; Establissement d'un Critere de Determination de Point de Transition et Calcul de la Trainee de Profile Incompressible,” ONERA Rept. 1/1578A 1951
17. Dvorak, F. A. Woodward, F. A. “A Viscous/Potential Flow Interaction Analysis Method for Multi-Element Infinite Swept Wings, Volume I,” NASA CR-2476 1974
18. Cebeci, T. Smith, A. M. O. “Calculation of Profile Drag of Airfoils at Low Mach Numbers,” Journal of Aircraft 5 Nov.-Dec. 1968 535 542
19. Rokhsaz, K. Selberg, B. P. “Disadvantages of Thin Airfoil Formulations for Closely Coupled Airfoils,” Journal of Aircraft 20 6 June 1983 574 576
20. McGhee, R. J. “Wind Tunnel Results for a 13-Percent-Thick Medium Speed Airfoil Section,” NASA TM in publication
21. Laitone, E. V. “Prandtl's Biplane Theory Applied to Canard and Tandem Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft 17 4 April 1980 233 237
22. Kroo, Ilan M. “Minimum Induced Drag of Canard Configurations,” Journal of Aircraft 19 9 September 1982 792 794
23. Butler, G. F. “Effect of Downwash on the Induced Drag of Canard-Wing Combinations,” Journal of Aircraft 19 5 May 1982 410 411
24. Tulinius, J. “Unified Subsonic, Transonic, and Supersonic NAR Vortex Lattice,” TFD-72-523 North American Rockwell Los Angeles 1972
25. Paulson, J. W. “Application of Vortex Lattice Theory to Preliminary Aerodynamic Design,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center Langley Station, Va. 1976
26. Holmes, B. J. Croom, C. C. “Aerodynamic Design Data for a Cruise- Matched High Performance Single Engine Airplane,” SAE Paper 810625 1981
27. Benstein, E. H. Smith, R. “Advanced General Aviation Turbine Engine (GATE) Study,” NASA CR-159624 June 1979
28. Keith, M. W. Selberg, B. P. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization/Trim Analysis of Canard/Conventional Configurations,” O. of Aircraft 21 3 183 193

Cited By