This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Experimental Car-Pedestrian Collisions Performed with Various Modified Side-Impact Dummies and Cadavers
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1984 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Experimental car-pedestrian collisions were performed with a modified PART 572 dummy and cadavers; they involved some reconstructions of real accidents. These collisions brought to light the differences between the kinematics and the impact responses when dummy and human subject are compared under identical and realistic test conditions to simulate a pedestrian struck sideways.
These differences are mainly due to the overall relative stiffness of the PART 572 dummy when compared to cadavers. Same-type collisions were therefore carried out again with other dummies which were designed so as to simulate human response in lateral impact better; thus they were also assumed to display better kinematics as pedestrians. APROD and ONSER dummies were used; when compared to PART 572, their flexibility and deformation capabilities are greater, in particular as regards their thoraxes and shoulders.
The corresponding runs are analyzed; results in terms of comparisons between their kinematics and that of PART 572 dummies are obtained. In addition, some runs were performed with human subjects under strictly identical conditions in order to obtain references for the ranking of these dummies' responses. Data obtained are discussed. Findings of this research should be used as a starting point for the specification of a correct pedestrian dummy, i.e. with humanlike responses when struck by a vehicle.
- F. Brun-Cassan - Laboratory of Physiology and Biomechanics, Peugeot S.A./Renault, France
- J. C. Vincent - Laboratory of Physiology and Biomechanics, Peugeot S.A./Renault, France
- C. Tarriere - Laboratory of Physiology and Biomechanics, Peugeot S.A./Renault, France
- A. Fayon - Laboratory of Physiology and Biomechanics, Peugeot S.A./Renault, France
- D. Cesari - O.N.S.E.R
- C. Cavallero - O.N.S.E.R
- G. Mauron - Centre d'Etudes Peugeot S.A.
CitationBrun-Cassan, F., Vincent, J., Tarriere, C., Fayon, A. et al., "Comparison of Experimental Car-Pedestrian Collisions Performed with Various Modified Side-Impact Dummies and Cadavers," SAE Technical Paper 841664, 1984, https://doi.org/10.4271/841664.
- Brun-Cassan F. Tarriẽre C. Fayon A. Mauron G. “Comparison of Behaviours for PART 572 and APROD Dummies Tested as Pedestrians Impacted by a Car, under Identical Test Conditioning” in Pedestrian Impact Injury and Assessment ( 830185 ) SAE International Congress and Exposition Detroit, MI, USA March 1983
- Thomas C. Vallẽe H. “Rappel accidentologique concernant les piétons impliqués dans les accidents de la route” Journal de la Société Française des Ingénieurs de 1'Automobile, n° 82-6 1982
- Hue B. Tarrière C. Leung Y.C. Fayon A. Got C. Patel A. “Injury Criteria in Lateral Collisions, When an APROD Dummy Is Used” 9th International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles November 1982 Kyoto, Japan
- Cotte J.P. “The ONSER 50 Dummy. A Research Tool For Safety” 8th International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles October 1980 Wolfsburg
- Cesari D. Ramet M. Zac R. “Comparative Pedestrian Test With Side Impact Dummy” Final EEC/KOB/ONSER Report, contract n° 8077 of Phase No. III of the EEC Program, Project K13 December 1981
- “Joint Biomechanical Research Project-KOB” Unfall und Sicherheitsforschung Strassen-verkher, Heft 34 1982
- Maltha J. Janssen E.G. “EEC Comparison Testing of Four Side Impact Dummies” October 1982 March 1983 TNO-EEC Biomechanics Program, Phase IV