This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Legislation for Seat Belt Use In Britain
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Some aspects of the legislative and political process leading to the adoption of a seat belt law in Britain are outlined. The technical arguments in favour of such a law were successful in debates in which the freedom of choice was the main substantive counter-argument. The economic aspects of the decision were vital as were the outside influences of the specialist organisations and the media. Early indications are usage rates rising from 40% to 90% with the introduction of the belt law, and for the first five months of operation a reduction in fatal and serious casualties of some 20%. Control casualties, represented by rear occupants and pedestrians and motorcyclists, increased due to seasonal factors and therefore the 20% reduction in front seat car occupant casualties is probably conservative. Some post-law problems of belt use for small pregnant women and arthritis sufferers are mentioned, together with the difficulty of facial injuries to restrained drivers from steering wheels. The policy choices of seat belt laws and passive restraints for the United States are discussed, and the great importance of belt laws to cover the period of at least a decade of lead time necessary for the passive restraint option is shown to be vital.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Mackay, M., "Legislation for Seat Belt Use In Britain," SAE Technical Paper 840328, 1984, https://doi.org/10.4271/840328.Also In
References
- Mackay G. M. “A Review of Seat Belt Crash Performance in the United Kingdom” Proc. Seat Belt Seminar Dept of Transport Canberra Australia Paper 12 March 1976
- Hansard. House of Lords Debate on the Transport Bill H.M.S.O. London 228 266 7 May 1981
- Hansard. House of Lords Official Report H.M.S.O. London 421 95 353 670 11 June 1981
- Hamer M. “Do Compulsory Seat Belts Save Lives?” New Scientist London 19 February 461 1981
- Mackay G. M. Dale K. J. White A. “Seat Belts under a Voluntary Regime” Proc. IRCOBI Conf. Lyon. France 40 51 1982
- Ashton S. J. Mackay G. M. Camm S. “Seat Belt Use in Britain under Voluntary and Mandatory Conditions” Proc. AAAM Conf. San Antonio. Texas 65 77 1983
- Department of Transport “Road Accidents and Casualties in Great Britain” Statistical Bulletin STCG 83 2 London October 1983
- Mackay G. M. “Seat Belts in Europe - Their Use and Performance in Collisions” Proc. Int. Symp. on Occupant Restraint AAAM Illinois 39 54 June 1981
- Griffiths D. K. et al. “Car Occupant Fatalities and the Effects of Future Safety Legislation” Proc. 20th Stapp Conf. S.A.E. Warrendale, Pa 335 388 1976
- Mackay G. M. “Airbag Effectiveness” 14th FISITA Congress London 3/66 3/70 June 1972
- Department of Transportation FMVSS Occupant Crash Protection Federal Register 48 203 49 CFR. Part 571 October 19 1983
- Malliaris A. C. Hitchcock R. Hedlund J. “A Search for Priorities in Crash Protection” Crash Protection. SP-513 S.A. E. Warrendale, Pa. 1 34 June 1982
- Jandeleit O. Orain R. “Performance of a Non-Lacerative Windshield in Case of Accident and under Environmental Conditions” S. A. E. paper 770246 Warrendale. Pa. 1977