This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Practical and Economic Considerations of Converting Highway Vehicles to Use Natural Gas as a Fuel
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Natural gas provides a current, low-cost alternative to the use of gasoline and diesel fuel for highway transportation vehicles. However, due to the capital costs required to use natural gas as a transportation fuel in either compressed (CNG) or liquefied (LNG) forms, some applications are more advantageous than others. Generally, fleets provide the best opportunity for conversion because of the sheer volume of fuel required and because most vehicles return to a single location each day. The advent of small compressors may make conversion to natural gas feasible for private individuals.
Presently, the most popular conversions are to CNG due to the limited availability of liquefiers to produce LNG. The available conversion kits favor vehicles with certain characteristics: vehicles should have spark-ignition engines, be large enough to support the weight of the CNG fuel cylinders, consume at least 5 gallons of gasoline each day on average and have sufficient storage volume so that the fuel cylinders do not infringe on required load-carrying volume. The ease of conversion depends greatly on the vehicle. Pickup trucks are usually easy to convert while subcompact cars can present formidable challenges due to space requirements and load-carrying capacity.
The costs of converting to CNG include vehicle conversion costs, refueling station costs, and required operating and maintenance costs. These costs vary according to vehicles (how many storage tanks and how difficult the conversions are), the planned utilization of compressor capacity, whether the vehicles are refueled using slow-fill or fast-fill techniques and the refueling site preparation required. In this paper, these costs are explained and compiled for the conversion kits and refueling equipment presently available. A few case studies are explored to demonstrate what must be known to evaluate whether a fleet of vehicles has potential to save money using natural gas and how long it may take to see a return on the initial investment.
Also discussed in the paper is an overview of CNG safety aspects, especially as related to road and operating restrictions that may exist in some local jurisdictions. Thus, in keeping with the intent of this paper to be a practical guide for decision-makers, reference is made to safety-related considerations and the restrictions which may be imposed by some states or municipalities on CNG vehicle operation.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Bechtoid, R., Timbario, T., Tison, R., and Sprafka, R., "The Practical and Economic Considerations of Converting Highway Vehicles to Use Natural Gas as a Fuel," SAE Technical Paper 831071, 1983, https://doi.org/10.4271/831071.Also In
References
- Lafrenze, D. J. Glaub, J.C. Jones. D. B. “Case History Evaluation of Methane-Fueled Vehicles.” SAE Technical Paper No. 811222 October 1981
- Porter. J. W. “Environmental and Safety Aspects of Natural-Gas-Fueled Vehicles.” Presentation at the Institute of Gas Technology Symposium Nonpetroleum Vehicular Fuels II Detroit, Michigan June 15 1981
- Fleming R. D. Allsup J. R. (Bartlesville Energy Research Center) Natural Gas as an Automotive Fuel, An experimental Study. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines. Report on Investigation 7806 1973 11
- Golovoy A. Brashaw J. Enginering and Research Staff, Ford Motor Co. “On-Board Storage and Home Refueling Options for Natural Gas Vehicles,” SAE Paper No. 830382 , presented at the 1983 SAE Congress and Exposition Detroit, Michigan February 28 -March 4 1983
- Kanton, Communication with Mr. P. Kanton Air Products, East Syracuse, New York, June 8 1982
- Whitlock, Correspondence from Mr. D. J. Rochester Gas and Electric Company, January 3 1983
- Harris G. S. New Zealand Energy Research and Development Committee, University of Auckland, New Zealand “Implementation of CNG in New Zealand,” presented at the Conference on New Energy Conservation Technologies and Their Commercialization Berlin, Germany April 6-10 1981
- Helart K. (Beech Aircraft Corporation, Boulder, Colorado) Personal communication August 1982
- “Qualification Maintenance and Use of Cylinders (4L Cylinder)” Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 173.34)
- Engineering Design, Inc. (St. Johns, Michigan) Personal communication July 1982
- “Storage and Handling: Liquefied Natural Gas.” National Fire Protection Association Bulletin 59
- Lisle R. (Northwest Natural Gas Company, Portland, Oregon) Personal communication July 1982
- Swank J. (LaClede Gas Co., St. Louis, Missouri) Personal communication June 1982
- Powell D. (Norwalk Company, Norwalk, Connecticut) Personal communication July 1982
- O'Connell J. (Mako Compressors, Ocala, Florida) Personal communication July 1982
- PIN Advisory Report “Compressed Natural Gas as a Government Vehicle Fuel.” McGraw-Hill July 1981
- MacCarley. C. “Acceleration of Automobiles Fueled by Natural Gas and Gasoline: A Comparison.” Denver Research Institute/ University of Denver April 1982
- The Aerospace Corporation “Assessment of Methane-Related Fuels for Automotive Fleet Vehicles.” U.S. Department of Energy February 1982
- “A Computer Program (VEHSIM) for Highway Vehicle Fuel Economy, Performance and Other Parameters.” U.S. Department of Transportation 1975
- Nesbitt R. Whitlock. D. “Vehicle Acceleration: Natural Gas Versus Unleaded Gasoline” Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation August 1982
- Joseph. J. “Natural Gas Fuels Bus Diesel.” Diesel and Gas Turbine Progress August 1971
- Wadman. B. “LNG-Fueled - Is This the Most Practical Way to Minimize Transit Bus Exhaust Emissions?” Diesel and Gas Turbine Progress October 1971
- Roberts. B. “Diesel Engines Designed to Run on Propane?” Butane-Propane News January 1982
- “Natural Gas Engine Versions of Cummins' Diesels.” Diesel and Gas Turbine Progress August 1980
- “Sewer Gas Powers English Vehicles.” Solid Wastes Management August 1982
- Bro K. Pedersen. P. S. “Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels: An Experimental Investigation of Methanol, Ethanol, Methane, and Ammonia in a D.I. Diesel Engine with Pilot Injection.” SAE Technical Paper No. 770794 1977
- Research Memorandum 531 “State Taxation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Compressed Natural Gas Used as Motor Fuel,” prepared by the Federation of Tax Administrators, 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001, March 1982
- Bechtold R. L. Timbario T. J. et al Mueller Associates, R. R. Tison and R. J. Sprafka, E:F Technology, Inc., “Technology and Market Assessment of Gas-Fueled Vehicles in New York State - Phase I Interim Report,” prepared for the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority September 30 1982
- Grant E. L. Ireson, W. G. Principles of Engineering Economy Fifth Edition 1970 The Ronald Press Company 528 529