This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Critical Issues in Finite Element Modeling of Head Impact
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Current finite element models of head impact involve a geometrically simplified fluid-filled shell composed of homogeneous, linear and (visco) elastic materials as the primary surrogate of the human skull and brain. The numerical procedure, which solves the mechanical response to impact, requires and presumes continuity of stress and displacement between elements, a defined boundary condition simulating the neck attachment and a known forcing function.
Our critical review of the models discussed, primarily, the technical aspects of the approximations made to simulate the head and the limitations of the proposed analytical tools in predicting the response of biological tissue. The following critical features were identified as major factors which compromised the accuracy and objectivity of the models:
-
- The brain was approximated by a fluid contained in an elastic or rigid shell with no provision for relative motion between the shell and fluid. The approximation is inadequate in view of clinical and experimental evidence asserting that brain injury may be strongly influenced or caused by skull deformation and relative brain motion.
-
- The computed shell strains were greater by as much as a factor of ten in a numerical comparison with experimental data. Moreover, the fluid pressure was dissimilar in phase and amplitude, with peak pressures representing about 25% of the experimental value.
-
- The model objectivity was compromised by using different fluid compressibilities which varied by a factor of 200 to match experimental data. No scientific justification could be found for the wide variation in fluid property.
-
- The first three resonant frequencies were about one-tenth of the values reported for the human head. The dynamic dissimilarity was probably due to an insufficient number of elements in the model and produced an incorrect impact response.
-
- The acceleration input was not sufficiently representative of a typical head impact. Similarily, the boundary condition representing the neck attachment was either excluded or unrealistically simulated inspite of its strong influence on the response.
-
- The proposed brain tolerance criteria, based on fluid pressures, indicated potential errors in space and time increments of the finite element solution.
Although significant progress has been made in the development and refinement of finite element models of head impact, the available computer programs represent mechanical simulations which are inadequate to establish tolerance criteria or predict head injury. In fact, the models are only a qualitative simulation of a simplified head surrogate, and as such, constitute merely the first approximation of one aspect of a highly complex biological problem.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Khalil, T. and Viano, D., "Critical Issues in Finite Element Modeling of Head Impact," SAE Technical Paper 821150, 1982, https://doi.org/10.4271/821150.Also In
References
- Anzelius, A. “The Effect of an Impact on a Spherical Liquid Mass.” Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand., Supp 48 1943 153 159
- Goldsmith W. “The Physical Processes Producing Head Injury,” Caveness W. F. Walker A. E. Head Injury Conference Proceedings J. B. Lippincott Philadelphia 1966 350 382
- Engin, A. E. “The Axisymmetric Response of a Fluid-Filled Spherical Shell to a Local Radial Impulse. A Model for Head Injury,” J. Biomech 2 1969 324 341
- Hickling R. Wenner, M. L. “Mathematical Model of a Head Subjected to an Axisymmetric Impact,” J. Biomech. 6 1973 115 132
- Khalil T. B. Hubbard, R. P. “Parametric Study of Head Response by Finite Element Modeling,” J. Biomech. 10 1977 119 132
- Shugar T. A. Katona, M. G. “Development of Finite Element Head Injury Model,” J. ASCE. 101 E173 1975 223 239
- Ward C. C. Thompson R. B. “The Development of a Detailed Finite Element Brain Model,” Proceedings of 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference San Diego, Calif. Oct 1975 641 674
- Shugar T. A. “A Finite Element Head Injury Model,” I 1977
- Hosey R. R. Liu Y. K. “A Homeomorphic Finite Element Model of Impact Head and Neck Injury,” International Conference Proceedings of Finite Elements in Biomechanics 2 Simon B. R. Tucson, Arizona 1980 851 871
- Unterharnscheidt F. Sellier K. “Mechanics and Pathomorphology of Closed Brain Injuries,” Caveness W. F. Walker A. E. Head Injury Conference Proceedings J. B. Lippincott Philadelphia 1966 321 341
- Holbourn, A. H. S. “Mechanics of Head Injuries,” Lancet 2 1943 438 441
- Wood, J. L. “Dynamic Response of Human Cranial Bone,” J. Biomech. 4 1971 1 12
- Nahum A. M. Smith, W. R. “An Experimental Model for Closed Head Impact Injury,” Proceedings of 20th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Dearborn, Mich 1976 783 813
- Nahum A. M. Smith R. W. Ward C. C. “Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact,” Proceedings of 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference New Orleans, LA 1977 337 365
- Khalil T. B. Viano, D. C. “Impact Response of a Viscoelastic Head Model,” Proceedings of 30th ACEMB, Los Angeles, Calif. 1977 234 235
- Chan H. S. “Mathematical Model for Closed Head Impact,” Proceedings of 18th Stapp Car Crash Conference Ann Arbor, Mich. 1974 557 378
- Ward, C. C. “Analytical Brain Models for Head Impact,” Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Impact Trauma, IRCOBI, Berlin, Germany 1977 389 398
- Ward, C. C. Nikravesh P. E. Thompson, R. B. “Biodynamic Finite Element Models used in Brain Injury Research,” J. of Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 1978 136 142
- Gurdjian, E. S. Hodgson, V. R. Thomas, L. M. Patrick, L. H. “The Significance of Relative Movements of Scalp, Skull and Intracranial Contents During Impact Injury of the Head,” J. Neurosurg. 29 1968 70 72
- Ommaya, A. K. Boretos J. H. Beile, E. E. “The Lexan Calvarium: An Improved Method for Direct Observation of the Brain,” J. Neurosurg. 30 1961 25 29
- Nahum A. Ward C. Raasch E. Adams S. Schneider D. “Experimental Studies of Side Impact to the Human Head,” Proceedings of 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference 1980 345 362
- Gurdjian E. S. “Deformation Studies of the Skull: Mechanisms of Skull Fracture,” Impact Head Injury Charles C. Thomas 1975 113 139
- Hosey R. R. Liu Y. K. “A Homeomorphic Finite Element Model of the Human Head and Neck,” Finite Elements in Biomechanics Wiley & Sons 1981
- Shatsky S. A. Alter W. A. III Evans D. E. Armbrustmacher V. Clark G. “Traumatic distortions of the primate head and chest: Correlation of biomechanical radiological and pathological data” 18th Stapp, SAE Paper 741186 1974 351 381
- McElhaney, J. H. et al. “Mechanical Properties of Cranial Bone,” J. of Biomechanics 3 1970 495 511
- Hubbard, R. P. “Flexure of Layered Cranial Bone,” J. of Biomechanics 4 1971 251 263
- McElhaney, J. H. et al. “Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Scalp and Brain,” Proceedings of the 6th Rocky Mountain Bio Engineering Symposium, Laramie, WY 1969
- Shuck L. Z. “Determination of the Dynamic Shear Modulus of Human Brain Tissue,” West Virginia University 1970
- Ward, C. C. “Finite Element Modeling of the Head and Neck,” NAMRL Head and Neck Injury Workshop, Miami, Florida 1980
- Goldsmith, H. “Current Controversies to the Stipulation of Head Injury Criteria, Letter to the editor” J. Biomechanics 14 No. 12 1981 883 884
- Taylor R. L. Sackman J. L. “Contact-Impact Problems,” Structures and Materials Research Department of Civil Engineering 1978
- Khalil, T. B. Viano D. C. Smith, D. L. “Experimental Analysis of the Vibrational Characteristics of the Human Skull,” J. of Sound and Vibration 63 (1) 1979 351 376
- Khalil T. B. Viano, D. C. “Comparison of Human Skull and Spherical Shell Vibrations, Implication to Head Injury Modeling,” J. of Sound and Vibrations 1981
- Nickell R. E. Marcal, P. V. “In-Vacuo Modal Dynamic Response of the Human Skull,” Transactions of ASME, J. of Eng. for Industry 1974 490 494
- Gurdjian, E. S. Hodgson V. R. Thomas, L. M. “Studies on Mechanical Impedance of the Human Skull: Preliminary Report,” J. of Biomechanics 3 1970 239 247
- Engin A. E. “The Axisymmetric Response of a Fluid-Filled Spherical Shell,” University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 1968
- Zienkiewicz O. C. The Finite Element Method Third Edition McGraw-Hill Book Company, (UK) Limited 1977
- Newmark, N. M. “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” J. of the Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, EM3 1959 67 95
- Bathe K. J. Wilson E. L. Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1976
- Ward C. Chan H. Nahum A. “Intracranial Pressure - A Brain Injury Criterion,” Proceedings of 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference 1980 163 185
- Ommaya A. K. et al. “Comparative Tolerances for Cerebral Concussion by Head Impact and Whiplash Injury in Primates,” International Automobile Safety Conference Compendium 1970 Detroit, Mich. 808 818
- Gurdjian E. S. Detroit, Michigan Jan. 18 1982
- A. K. Ommaya Washington, DC Jan. 21 1982
- Gurdjian E. S. “Relative Movement of Scalp, Skull and Intracranial Contents at the Time of Impact,” Impact Head Injury Charles C. Thomas 1975 162 180
- Nahum A. M. Smith R. W. “An experimental model for closed head impact injury,” proceedings of 20th Stapp Car Crash Conference 1976 785 814