This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Low and High Speed Propellers for General Aviation — Performance Potential and Recent Wind Tunnel Test Results
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Research sponsored by NASA has indicated that there is a significant potential for fuel savings from advanced propellers designed for lower speed general aviation (G.A.) aircraft as well as the advanced turboprop for future higher speed (Mach 0.6 to 0.8) aircraft. Lower speed G.A. propellers tested in the Lewis 10×10 foot wind tunnel had variations in the level of airfoil technology and activity factor. At cruise, the measured performance was about 4 to 5% below the predicted levels. A large part of this difference appears to be from inadequate modeling of blade and spinner losses with round shank blade designs. Blade cuffs and shaping of the spinner/blade juncture should offer the potential of recovering most of these losses, and combined with various advanced concepts may result in a 10 to 15% reduction in trip fuel for future lower speed G.A. aircraft. Advanced aerodynamic concepts for high cruise speeds were evaluated in the Lewis 8×6 foot wind tunnel. Results from these tests show high propeller performance can be obtained to at least Mach 0.8, offering the potential of reducing trip fuel by 15 to 30% compared to equivalent technology high bypass ratio turbofans.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | The Analysis of Counter-Rotating Propeller Systems |
Technical Paper | The Design and Performance of Shrouded Propellers |
Technical Paper | Comparison Plusher and Tractor Propulsion for Micro Air Vehicle Applications |
Authors
Citation
Jeracki, R. and Mitchell, G., "Low and High Speed Propellers for General Aviation — Performance Potential and Recent Wind Tunnel Test Results," SAE Technical Paper 811090, 1981, https://doi.org/10.4271/811090.Also In
References
- “General Aviation Propulsion,” NASA CP-2126 1980
- Keiter, I. D. “Impact of Advanced Propeller Technology on Aircraft/Mission Characteristics of Several General Aviation Aircraft,” SAE Paper 810584 1981
- Dittmar, J. H. Blaha, B. J. Jeracki, R. J. “Tone Noise of Three Supersonic Helical Tip Speed Propellers in a Wind Tunnel at 0.8 Mach Number,” NASA TM-79046 1978
- Dittmar, J. H. Jeracki, R. J. Blaha, B. J. “Tone Noise of Three Supersonic Helical Tip Speed Propellers in a Wind Tunnel,” NASA TM-79167 1979
- Jeracki, R. J. Mikkelson D. C. Blaha, B. J. “Wind Tunnel Performance of Four Energy Efficient Propellers Designed for Mach 0.8 Cruise,” NASA TM-79124, 1979 or SAE Paper 790573 1979
- Neitzel, R. E. Hirschkron, R. Johnston, R. P. “Study of Unconventional Aircraft Engines Designed for Low Energy Consumption,” General Electric Co., Cincinnati, OH 1976
- Mikkelson D. C. Mitchell, G. A. “High Speed Turboprops for Executive Aircraft Potential and Recent Test Results,” NASA TM 81482 1980
- Black, D. M. Menthe, R. W. Wainauski, H. S. “Aerodynamic Design and Performance Testing of an Advanced 30° Swept, Eight Bladed Propeller at Mach Numbers from 0.2 to 0.85,” NASA CR-3047 1978
- Glauert, H. “Wind Tunnel Interference on Wings, Bodies and Airscrews,” Aeronautical Research Council, London, Reports and Memoranda No. 1566 1933
- Young, A. D. “Note on the Application of the Linear Perturbation Theory to Determine the Effect of Compressibility on the Wind Tunnel Constraint on a Propeller,” Aeronautical Research Council, London, Reports and Memoranda No. 2113 1944
- Bocci, A. J. “A New Series of Aerofoil Sections Suitable for Aircraft Propellers,” Aeronautical Quarterly 28 1977 59 73
- Goldstein, S. “On the Vortex Theory of Screw Propellers,” Proceedings of the Royal Society London 123 1929 440 465
- Theodorsen, T. “Theory of Propellers,” New York, NY McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1948
- Bober, L. J. Mitchell, G. A. “Summary of Advanced Methods for Predicting High Speed Propeller Performance,” NASA TM X-81409 or A1AA Paper 80-0225 1980
- Reid, E. G. “Studies of Blade Shank Form and Pitch Distribution for Constant-Speed Propellers,” NACA TN-947 1945
- Maynard, J. D. “Aerodynamic Characteristics at High Speeds of Full-Scale Propellers Having Different Shank Designs,” NACA RM-L6L27a 1947
- Reid, J. V. “Advanced V/STOL Propeller Technology-Cruise Performance Tests.” AFFDL -TR-71-88 III 1971
- Hoerner, S. F. “Fluid-Dynamic Drag,” Mid land Park, NJ, Hoerner, S. F. 1958
- Korkan, K. D. Gregorek, G. M. Mikkelson, D. C. “A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Propeller Performance Methodoloigies,” AIAA Paper 80-1240 1980
- Swallow R. J. Aiello, R. A. “NASA Lewis 8- by 6- Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel,” NASA TM X-71542 1974
- Dugan, J. F. Jr. Gatzen, B. S. Adamson, W. M. “Prop-Fan Propulsion - Its Status and Potential,” SAE Paper 780995 1978
- Metzger F. B. Rohrback, C. “Aero-Acoustic Design of the Prop-Fan,” AIAA Paper 79-0610 1979
- Hanson, D. B. “Near Field Noise of High Tip Speed Propellers in Forward Flight,” AIAA Paper 76-565 1976
- Sullivan, J. P. Chang, L. K. Miller, C. J. “The Effect of Proplets and Bi-Blades on the Performance and Noise of Propellers,” SAE Paper 810600 , SAE Bus iness Aircraft Meeting and Exposition 1981