This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Vehicle/Fuel Test Procedures with Customer Driving
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
An instrumented “chase” car was used to observe and record driving patterns for over 3,000 motorists in three different regions. How these motorists actually drove their cars was then compared to three standardized driving procedures used to evaluate fuels: the EPA's city and highway driving schedules used for emissions and fuel economy testing, the CRC E-15 Technique for Determination of Octane Number Requirements of Light-Duty Vehicles, and the CRC Cold Start and Driveaway Test Procedure used in fuel volatility work to evaluate vehicle driveability. All of these driving procedures were found to differ from the way motorists actually drove their cars. Accelerations are generally less rapid in the EPA cycles, and engine loading is lower than it is on the road in both the acceleration and cruise modes. Accelerations in the CRC E-15 technique were not consistent with the way motorists actually accelerate and the magnitude of the accelerations depended on the car being rated. In the CRC driveability cycle, some of the maneuvers were difficult to follow, resulting in poor repeatability of the accelerations.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Klen, D., "Comparison of Vehicle/Fuel Test Procedures with Customer Driving," SAE Technical Paper 810491, 1981, https://doi.org/10.4271/810491.Also In
References
- Johnson T. M. Formenti D. L. Gray Richard F. Peterson William C. “Measurement of Motor Vehicle Operation Pertinent to Fuel Economy.” Paper 75003 presented at SAE Congress and Exposition Detroit February 1975
- “Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedules.” Federal Register 42 124 June 28 1977
- “Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule.” Federal Register 41 177 September 10 1976
- “Technique for Determination of Octane Number Requirements of Passenger Cars.” (CRC Designation E-15-79) July 1978
- “Driveability Performance of 1977 Passenger Cars at Intermediate Ambient Temperatures Paso Robles.” Coordinating Research Council Report No. 499, Appendix C September 1978
- Huls Thomas A. “Evaluation of Federal Light-Duty Mass Emission Regulations.” Paper 730554 presented at SAE Automobile Engineering Meeting Detroit May 1973
- “Technique for Determination of Octane Number Requirements of Passenger Cars.” (CRC Designation E-15-81) April 1980