This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Multi Rotor Options For Heavy Lift
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
Aerospace Meeting
Language:
English
Abstract
This paper reviews some previous and current helicopters designed for heavy lift. Technology status is also reviewed and the problem of arrested development is shown to be in part due to the economics of insufficient utilization. Nevertheless, both military and civil needs are discussed and are projected to grow. A possible resolution of this utilization dilemma is suggested via tri rotor and quad rotor variants of the tilt rotor family of V/STOL aircraft. Multi (greater than two) rotor dynamic systems are projected to weigh less than twin rotor systems and are therefore a way of avoiding rapid design disc loading increases in an attempt to maintain productive vehicle weights. In addition, development risk, investment, and logistic costs are minimized if dynamic components are planned or in use on a smaller aircraft with high production potential. The current paper compares three and four rotor, tilt rotor V/STOL aircraft with an advanced tandem helicopter. All have four engines. The multi rotor V/STOL aircraft use turboshaft engines in the power class of the recent Navy subsonic V/STOL and Maritime Patrol Aircraft studies. Some design considerations discussed include: safety, aeroelastic stability, external noise, downwash effects, handling qualities and performance. New capabilities projected include lower-risk dynamic system development, payload-range characteristics and mainly, productivity impact. It is shown, for example, that the multi rotor option can service four times the revenue-producing territory (or theater of operations) per day than an advanced tandem helicopter. Recommendations are to pursue configuration research through design studies and analyses, scale model tests of aerodynamic interference, aeroelastic effects and dynamic load distributions. A potential subscale flight test with four XV-15 rotors and transmissions is suggested as a simulation of the development concept.
Citation
DeTore, J. and Martin, S., "Multi Rotor Options For Heavy Lift," SAE Technical Paper 791089, 1979, https://doi.org/10.4271/791089.Also In
References
- Taylor, John W. R. “Jane's All the World's Aircraft,” 1978-1979
- “HLH Drive System,” Boeing Vertol Company USAAMRDL Technical Report 77-38 U. S. Army Aviation Research and Development Command September 1977
- “HLH Rotor Blade Manufacturing Technology Development Report,” Boeing Vertol Company USAAMRDL Technical Report 77-39 U. S. Army Aviation Research and Development Command September 1977
- “Military Turboshaft Engine, Models T701-AD-700, YT701-AD-700, and XT601-AD-700,” Detroit Diesel Allison Prime Item Development Specification 844-B 30 May 1974
- “Heavy Lift Helicopter Flight Control System, Volume I, Production Recommendations,” Boeing Vertol Company USAAMRDL Technical Report 77-40A U. S. Army Aviation Research and Development Command September 1977
- Means E. H. et al “Operational Effectiveness and Compatibility of Large Helicopters in Various Helicopter Mixes in Amphibious Operations (1980-90),” Stanford Research Institute, Naval Warfare Research Center May 1973
- “Army Aviation RDT&E Plan, Sixth Edition,” U. S. Army Aviation Research and Development Command October 1977
- “Flying Crane Parametric Design Study Summary Report,” Bell Helicopter Corporation Report No. D229-099-002 March 1957
- DeTore J. A. “Trends for Optimum Crane Design,” Fourth Annual Western Forum AHS October 1957
- Kaplan D. H. “Development of Quad Control for VTOL,” Fifteenth Annual National Forum AHS May 1959
- Kaplan D. H. “Quadrotor Studies, Whirl Testing, and Parametric Analysis Summary Report,” Convertawings, Inc. U. S. Army Transportation Research and Engineering Command 15 December 1958
- “X-19 Category I Limited Flight Evaluation,” Air Force Flight Test Center Technical Report No. 66-27 October 1966
- DeTore J. A. Sambell K. W. “Conceptual Design Study of 1985 Commercial Tilt Rotor Transports - VTOL Design Summary,” BHC Report No. D312-099-002 NASA May 1975
- Sambell K. W. “Conceptual Design Study of 1985 Commercial Tilt Rotor Transports - STOL Design Summary,” BHC Report No. D313-099-001 NASA April 1976
- Magee J. P. Clark R. D. Widdison C. A. “Conceptual Engineering Studies of 1985 ERA Commercial VTOL and STOL Transports that Utilize Rotors,” Boeing Vertol Company Report No. D210-10918-1 NASA May 1975
- DeTore J. A. Brown E. L. “Summary of Design Studies and Results of Model Tests of the Folding-Proprotor Aircraft Concept,” Bell Helicopter Company Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory Technical Report 72-81 July 1972
- DeTore J. A. Engle F. V. “Spectrum of Army Applications for Tilt-Rotor Aircraft, Volume 1 - Design Summary,” Bell Helicopter Company Report No. D314-099-001 December 1975
- DeTore John “Tilt Rotor - An Effective V/STOL Concept,” SAWE Paper No. 1273, 38th Annual Conference of Society of Allied Weight Engineers May 1979
- Lynn R. R. Cox C. R. “Helicopter Noise Standards--Another Point of View, A Rational Approach to Rotorcraft Noise Regulation,” Paper No. 55, Fourth European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum September 1978
- Harris D. J. Simpson R. D. “Final Report, CH-53E Helicopter Downwash Evaluation,” Naval Air Test Center Technical Report No. SY-89R-78 1 August 1978
- Harris D. J. Simpson R. D. “Final Report, Downwash Evaluation Under the U. S. Army Heavy Lift Helicopter Naval Air Test Center Technical Report No. SY-17R-78 16 March 1976
- Hoerner S. F. Borst H. V. “Fluid-Dynamic Lift Hoerner Fluid Dynamics Brick Town, N. J. 1975
- “An Independent Estimate of Selected Costs of the Heavy Lift Helicopter,” Directorate of Cost Analysis, Office of the Comptroller of the Army 19 August 1974