This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Cost Effectiveness of 1985 Automobile Fuel Economy Standards
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The cost effectiveness of the current automobile fuel economy standards program is evaluated. A life cycle cost analysis is used to quantify the costs and benefits of fuel economy improvements stimulated by the program. The magnitude of these improvements is estimated by measuring the difference between the standards and a baseline “no standards” case. Due to the uncertainty associated with technology cost estimates, two scenarios are developed to bound the cost of fuel economy improvement; an “optimistic” scenario using technology cost and MPG gains documented by DOT and another “pessimistic” scenario based on conservative technology cost and fuel economy estimates.
A review of fuel economy legislation concludes that marginal cost effectiveness to the nation be a significant criterion for setting future fuel economy standards. Decreasing the 1985 fuel economy standard from 27.5 to 26.5 mpg is shown to result in net consumer losses without accounting for decreases in national benefits. The conflicting requirements of increased costs due to fuel economy improvements, the consumer and national benefits which also result and other aspects of economic practicability are discussed and an overall frame work for setting future fuel economy standards is suggested.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Difiglio, C., Dulla, R., and Duleep, K., "Cost Effectiveness of 1985 Automobile Fuel Economy Standards," SAE Technical Paper 790930, 1979, https://doi.org/10.4271/790930.Also In
References
- Difiglio Carmen Kulash Damian “Methodology and Analysis of Ways of Increasing Fuel Energy Resources: Increasing Fuel Economy via Government Policy,” US-USSR Joint Energy Committee: Information and Forecasting Washington, D.C. December 1977
- McNutt Barry et al. “A Comparison of Fuel Economy Results from EPA Tests and Actual In-Use Experience, 1974 to 1977 Model Year Cars,” Society of Automotive Engineers Technical paper Series, No. 780037 1978
- U.S. Department of Transportation “Final Impact Assessment of the Automobile Fuel Economy Standards for Model Year 1981 to 1984 Passenger Cars,” June 30 1977
- Corporate Tech Planning, Inc. “Augmentation of Research and Analysis Capabilities for Timely Support of Automobile Fuel Economy Activities,” U.S. Department of Transportation 1978
- South Coast Technology, Inc. “Specific Technologies for Improved Fuel Economy of Spark Ignition Piston Engines,” U.S. Department of Transportation 1978
- Automotive Engineering “Vehicle Aerodynamics-The Next Fuel Economy Frontier” July 1979 19
- Automotive Engineering “Torque Converter Locks in Fuel Savings” 85 11 Nov. 1977
- Environmental Protection Agency “Gas Mileage Guide 1978” 21
- U.S. Department of Transportation “Report on Requests by G.M. and Ford to Reduce Fuel Economy Standards for MY ‘81-85’” June 1979
- Currie J.H. et. al. “Energy Conservation with Increased Compression Ratio and Electronic Knock Control” SAE Paper 709173 March 1979
- Parker R.H. “Bendix Sequential Fuel Injection for 0.4 NO x Control” SAE Paper 790175 March 1979
- Lefferts C. “Improved Accessory Drives” Automotive Power Systems Contractors' Coordination Meeting” May 1975 Washington, D.C.
- Goodwin M.C. Haviland M.L. “Fuel Economy Improvements in EPA and Road Tests with Engine Oil and Rear Axle Lubricant Viscosity Reduction” SAE Paper No. 78059 June 1978
- Federal Highway Administration “Nationwide Personal Transportation Study.”
- Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data provided by staff
- McNutt B. Dulla R. “On-Road Fuel Economy Trends and Impacts,” Transportation Research Board Conference January 1979 Washington, D.C.