This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Selecting Equipment for Failure Analysis
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
For every failure, whether at the field test site or with the customer, there is a related cause. It is imperative that the exact cause be determined in order that appropriate corrective action may be taken. The field test engineer is immediately faced with deciding where the analysis shall be performed. The choices range from analysis at the field test site to sending the parts to the materials laboratory. The key in handling the analysis lies in knowing what equipment is available and the capabilities of each.
This paper offers guidelines to aid in the decision whether a failure should be analyzed immediately in the field or returned to the laboratory. Furthermore, the capabilities of individual pieces of equipment are described while simultaneously out-lining methods which were developed to assist the failure analyst in selecting which tools would be most appropriate for a given analysis. The majority of the tests available, including hardness, fatigue properties, optical and electron microscopy and x-ray and electron spectrometers, are discussed with particular attention given to those tools most often used during failure analysis in the ground vehicle industry. Examples are included to illustrate the types of information found and how that information relates to the cause of failure. For those cases where broken parts are returned to the laboratory, suggestions are offered in how to protect the parts so that the failure analyst will still be able to uncover the cause of failure.
Authors
Citation
Boardman, B., "Selecting Equipment for Failure Analysis," SAE Technical Paper 790893, 1979, https://doi.org/10.4271/790893.Also In
References
- Lipson, C. Machine Design September 1950
- Hertzberg, Richard W. “Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Glasser, W. A. “Wear Failure Analysis,” Wear of Materials 1979, Proceedings of the International Conference on Wear of Materials Dearborn, Michigan April 1979
- Baker, Hugh “Color Metallography as a Diagnostic Tool,” Metal Progress September 1977 52 54
- Sickafus, E. N. “Surface Characterization by Auger Electron Spectrometry,” American Vacuum Society j. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11 1 January February 1974
- Lane, W. C. Pease D. E. Yew N. C. “Secondary Ion Analysis of Materials in the SEM,” International Metallographic Society, Inc. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Technical Meeting International Microstructrual Analysis Society, Inc. Beverly Hills, California September 1973
- Phillips, A. et. al. “Electron Fractography Handbook,” Air Force Materials Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Ohio 1965
- SEM/TEM Fractograph Handbook Metals & Ceramics Information Center, Battelle Columbus Laboratory Columbus, Ohio 43201 1975
- Dahlberg, E.P. “Techniques for Cleaning Service Failures in Preparation for Scanning Electron Microscope and Microprobe Analysis,” Scanning Electron Microscopy 1974 IIT Research Institute Chicago, IL 60616
- Boardman, B.E. Zipp R. Goering W.A. “A Coating for the Preservation of Fracture Surface,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper 750967 Warrendale, PA 15096 1975
- Metals Handbook 10 “Failure Analysis and Prevention,” American Society for Metals Metals Park, Ohio 44073 1975
- Metals Handbook 9 “Fractography and Atlas of Fractographs,” American Society for Metals Metals Park, Ohio 44073 1975
- Scanning Electron Microscopy 1974 IIT Research Institute Chicago, Illinois 60616
- Goldstein, J.I. Yakowitz H. “Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy,” Plenum Press New York, NY 10011 1975
- Boardman, B.E. “Failure Analysis-How to Choose the Right Tool,” 1979 SEM Inc. AMF O'Hara, IL 60666, USA