This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Accuracy of Simplified Fatigue Prediction Methods
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
THREE SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES for predicting fatigue life are compared with actual test results. The part geometry, load histories, material properties, and test results used in these analyses were obtained from the SAE Fatigue Design and Evaluation Committee's Cumulative Fatigue Damage Test Program (1)*. The purpose of this effort is to evaluate the relative accuracy and applicability of these frequently used methods.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Tensile and Shear Properties of Several Solders at Cryogenic Temperatures |
Technical Paper | Combined High Voltage and lcing Tunnel Tests on Radomes |
Technical Paper | METHODS TO REDUCE COOLING FAN NOISE |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Tucker, L., Downing, S., and Camillo, L., "Accuracy of Simplified Fatigue Prediction Methods," SAE Technical Paper 750043, 1975, https://doi.org/10.4271/750043.Also In
References
- Bussa S. L. Tucker L. E. “The SAE Cumulative Fatigue Damage Test Program.” Paper No. 750038 , Automotive Engineering Congress & Exposition Society of Automotive Engineers Detroit February 1975
- Palmgren A. ZVDI 68 14 1924 339 341
- Miner M. A. “Cumulative Damage in Fatigue.” J. Applied Mechanics ASME 12 1945 A159 A164
- Matsuiski Masanori Endo Tatsuo “Fatigue of Metals Subjected to Varying Stress (The Fatigue Life of Materials Subjected to Random Strains.)” Kyushu District Meeting, Japan Soc. Mech. Engrs. Kitakyushu-Shi March 1968
- Dowling N. E. “Fatigue Failure Predictions for Complicated Stress-Strain Histories.” J. Materials ASTM March 1972
- Fuchs H. O. Nelson D. V. Burke M. A. Toomay T. L. “Shortcuts in Cumulative Damage Analysis,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper No. 730565 Automobile Engineering meeting Detroit, Michigan May 1973