This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Femur Load Injury Criteria - A Realistic Approach
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1973 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The analysis presented in this paper indicates that while 1700 lbf (7560 N) is a realistic femur fracture load for 30-50 ms duration impacts, the human femur can withstand higher loads for shorter-duration impacts. Experimental femur fracture data from cadaver and bone specimen tests are reviewed. These data are used to develop femur load fracture tolerance as a function of impact duration.
On the basis of a measured 10% amplification of 1-2 ms input forces by the dummy, the cadaver fracture tolerance is proportionately adjusted to arrive at equivalent load levels for forces measured on current dummy test devices.
Experimental dummy test device data are included and compared to the theoretical response of a mathematical model of the human upper leg. This comparison demonstrates that even neglecting the 10% amplification, there are still significant differences in the response of dummy and human upper leg structures for impact durations less than 3 ms.
|Technical Paper||Impact Response and Tolerance of the Lower Extremities|
|Technical Paper||Cadaver Femur Responses to Longitudinal Impacts|
|Technical Paper||Investigation of Impact Response and Fracture of the Human Femur by Finite Element Modeling|
CitationKing, J., Fan, W., and Vargovick, R., "Femur Load Injury Criteria - A Realistic Approach," SAE Technical Paper 730984, 1973, https://doi.org/10.4271/730984.
- Patrick L. M., Kroell C. K., and Mertz H. J., “Forces On the Human Body in Simulated Crashes.” Proceedings of Ninth Stapp Car Crash Conference. Minneapolis: Nolte Center for Continuing Education, University of Minnesota, 1965.
- McElhaney J. H., “Dynamic Response of Bone and Muscle Tissue.” Jrl. Appl. Physiol., Vol. 31 (1966), p. 1231.
- Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc., “Research in Impact Protection of Automobile Occupants.” DOT Contract No. FH-11-6955, July 1969.
- Hirsh C., “Force in the Hip Joint.” Biomechanics and Related Bio-Engineering Topics, Proceedings of Symposium, Glasgow, September 1964, ed. Kenedi R. M., Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 341-350.
- Rybicki E. F., et al., “On the Mathematical Analysis of Stress in the Human Femur.” Jrl. Biomechanics, Vol. 5 (1972), pp. 203-215.
- Biggs J. M., “Introduction to Structural Dynamics.” New York: McGrawHill, 1964.
- Koch J. O., “The Laws of Bone Architecture.” AJA, Vol. 21, 1917.
- Gadd C. W., Nahum A. M., et al., “Tolerance and Properties of Superficial Soft Tissue in Situ.” Paper 700910, Proceedings of Fourteenth Stapp Car Crash Conference, P-33, New York: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1970.
- Cook F. W., Nagel D. A., “Biomechanical Analysis of Knee Impact.” Paper 690800, Proceedings of Thirteenth Stapp Car Crash Conference, P-28. New York: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1969.
- Godden W. G., “Numerical Analysis of Beam and Column Structures.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1965.