This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Fuel Composition on Amount and Reactivity of Evaporative Emissions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1969 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The effect of fuel composition on automotive evaporative emissions has been studied using five cars, not equipped with evaporative emission controls, and a total of 31 fuels. The amount of evaporative emissions increased with increasing fuel volatility. Also, the evaporative emission photochemical reactivity per gram increased with increasing C4 and C5 olefins in the fuel and decreased with increasing C4 and C5 paraffins.
For an assessment of the smog potential of evaporative emissions, the amount and reactivity per gram should not be considered independently, since they both are simultaneously dependent on fuel composition. The product of amount and reactivity per gram (the Evaporative Reactive Index) is a good measure of the contribution of evaporative emissions to photochemical air pollution. An empirical equation for predicting the Evaporative Reactive Index from fuel properties has been derived. First, the two-part equation predicts the emission amount from the percent fuel evaporated in an ASTM distillation at 160 F and the fuel’s Reid vapor pressure. Second, the reactivity per gram of the evaporative emissions can be determined from the percent C4 and C5 olefins and the percent C4 and C5 paraffins in the fuel.
Utilization of the Evaporative Reactive Index (ERI) may be illustrated by the following examples. Removal of 65% of the butane from the typical Los Angeles gasoline would reduce the fuel evaporated at 160 F from 29 - 23% and lower Reid vapor pressure from 9.5 - 7 psi. The ERI equation would predict a decrease in evaporative emission amount from 110 - 68 gm/day and an increase in reactivity per gram (based on the NO2 formation rate scale) from 0.049 – 0.055. The ERI (NO2) would decrease from 5.4 - 3.7 (31%). On the other hand, replacement of the C4 and C5 olefins in the same fuel with C4 and C5 paraffins would not affect the percent evaporated at 160 F, Reid vapor pressure, or emission amount; but the equation would predict a decrease in reactivity per gram (NO2) from 0.049 - 0.028 and a decrease in the ERI (NO2) from 5.4 - 3.1 (43%).
|Technical Paper||Control of Refueling Emissions with an Activated Carbon Canister on the Vehicle|
|Technical Paper||The External Combustion Piston Engine (ECPE)|
|Technical Paper||Ambient Temperature and Driving Cycle Effects on CNG Motor Vehicle Emission|
CitationJackson, M. and Everett, R., "Effect of Fuel Composition on Amount and Reactivity of Evaporative Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 690088, 1969, https://doi.org/10.4271/690088.
- State of California, Air Resources Board “California Fuel Evaporative Emissions Standard and Test Procedure for 1970 Model Light Duty Vehicles.” April 16 1968
- Mulac, J. C. McCafferty, R. L. Meyer, W. A. P. “Carburetor Evaporation Losses--Volatility and Reactivity.” Preprint No. 59–66, presented at API meeting, Houston, Texas May 1966
- Ebersole G. D. McReynolds, L. A. “An Evaluation of Automobile Total Hydrocarbon Emissions.” SAE Tech. Prog. Series 12 1967 413
- Federal Register 33 108 8304 June 4 1968
- Martens S. W. Thurston, K. W. “Measurement of Total Vehicle Evaporative Emissions.” Paper 680125, presented at SAE Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit January 1968
- Legatski T. W. Couch, R. R. “Fuel Systems of 1937 Automobiles.” API Proc. 18 1937 126
- Holaday W. M. Heath, D. P. “Motor Fuel Volatility Trends.” SAE Trans 59 1951 429
- Wentworth, J. T. “Carburetor Evaporation Losses.” SAE Progress in Technology Series, “Vehicle Emissions,” 6 1964 146
- Deeter W. F. Jewell, R. G. “Factors Affecting Carburetor Vapor Losses.” Presented at API meeting, Detroit, Mich. May 1960
- Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc. AMA Engineering Notes 616 “Fuel System Evaporative Losses.” September 1961
- Coordinating Research Council, Inc. “1965 CRC Motor Vehicle Evaporation Loss Tests.” June 1966
- Coordinating Research Council, Inc. “1966 CRC Motor Vehicle Evaporation Loss Technique Evaluation.” January 1967
- Stone R. K. Eccleston, B. H. “Vehicle Emissions vs. Fuel Composition.” Preprint No. 43–68, presented at API meeting, Philadelphia, Penna. May 1968
- McEwen, D. J. “Automobile Exhaust Hydrocarbon Analysis by Gas Chromatography.” Anal. Chem 38 1966 1047
- Tuesday C. S. Glasson, W. A. “Hydrocarbon Reactivity in the Atmospheric Photooxidation of Nitric Oxide.” Paper presented at ACS meeting, Atlantic City, N. J September 1965
- Jackson, M. W. “Effects of Some Engine Variables and Control Systems on Composition and Reactivity of Exhaust Hydrocarbons.” SAE Transactions 75 1967 114
- Altshuller, A. P. “An Evaluation of Techniques for the Determination of the Photochemical Reactivity of Organic Emissions.” Jour. APCA 16 1966 257
- Caplan, J. D. “Smog Chemistry Points the Way to Rational Vehicle Emission Control.” SAE Transactions 74 1966 140
- Altshuller, A. P. Kopczynski, S. L. Wilson, D. Lonneman, W. Sutterfield, F. D. “Photochemical Reactivities of n-Butane and Other Paraffinic Hydrocarbons” Jour. APCA 19 1969 787
- Altshuller, A. P. “An Evaluation of Techniques for the Determination of the Photochemical Reactivity of Organic Emissions” Jour. APCA 16 1966 257
- Heuss J. M. Glasson, W. A. “Hydrocarbon Reactivity and Eye Irritation” Environ. Sci. and Tech 2 1968 1109
- Muller, H. L. Kay, R. E. Wagnew, T. O. “Determining the Amount and Composition of Evaporation Losses from Automotive Fuel Systems” SAE Tech. Prog. Series 12 1967 402
- Wade, D. T. “Factors Influencing Vehicle Evaporative Emissions” Preprint No. 670126, presented at SAE meeting, Detroit, Michigan January 1967
- Koehl, W. J. Jr “Mathematical Models for Prediction of Fuel Tank and Carburetor Evaporation Losses” Preprint No. 690506, presented at SAE meeting, Chicago, Illinois May 1969