This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluation of Cylinder Pressure Transducer Performance Including the Influence of Mounting Location and Thermal Protection
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 21, 2022 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Automotive Technical Papers
The piezoelectric cylinder pressure transducer is one of the most critical tools for internal combustion (IC) engine research and development. However, not all cylinder pressure transducers perform equally in every application, and the fidelity of transducers can vary across different models and manufacturers. Even slightly dissimilar models from the same manufacturer can have significantly different performance in areas such as sensitivity and resistance to intra-cycle thermal shock. These performance differences can lead to errors and inconsistencies in the calculation of combustion metrics like mean effective pressure (MEP), the polytropic compression and expansion exponents (PolyC and PolyE), and mass fraction burn (MFB) calculations. The variations can lead to suboptimal hardware and calibration choices during the engine development phase. The use of flame arrestors to prevent the flame front from impinging on the face of the piezoelectric cylinder pressure transducer can have an effect on thermal shock (short-term error in transducer output caused by heat flux into the transducer face causing physical distortion and changing of the loading on the crystal) as well, and that effect is not always as intuitive as it may seem. This project does a methodical evaluation of four discrete piezoelectric transducers over a range of engine speeds, loads, and combustion phasings for two different mounting locations—one in the center of the cylinder closer to the flame initiation location and one in the end-gas location—with and without the use of flame arrestors. The results showed extensive differences in performance of the four separate cylinder pressure transducer models, as well as differences owing to the location of the transducer and the presence of a flame arrestor.
CitationDavis, R., Duncan, J., Gopujkar, S., and Worm, J., "Evaluation of Cylinder Pressure Transducer Performance Including the Influence of Mounting Location and Thermal Protection," SAE Technical Paper 2022-01-5014, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-5014.
- Heywood , J.B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals 1st New York McGraw-Hill Publications 1988
- Davis , R.S. and Patterson , G.J. Cylinder Pressure Data Quality Checks and Procedures to Maximize Data Accuracy SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1346 2006 https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-1346
- Lancaster , D.R. , Krieger , R.B. , and Lienesch , J.H. Measurement and Analysis of Cylinder Pressure Data SAE Technical Paper 750026 1975 https://doi.org/10.4271/750026
- Lee , K. , Yoon , M. , and Sunwoo , M. A Study on Pegging Methods for Noisy Cylinder Pressure Signal Control Engineering Practice 16 2008 922 929
- Gopujkar , S.B. , Worm , J. , and Robinette , D. Methods of Pegging Cylinder Pressure to Maximize Data Quality SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0721 2019 https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0721
- Patterson , G. and Davis , R. Geometric and Topological Considerations to Maximize Remotely Mounted Cylinder Pressure Transducer Data Quality SAE Int. J. Engines 2 1 2009 414 420 https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0644
- Randolph , A.L. Methods of Processing Cylinder-Pressure Transducer Signals to Maximize Data Accuracy SAE Technical Paper 900170 1990 https://doi.org/10.4271/900170
- Randolph , A.L. Cylinder Pressure Mounting Techniques to Maximize Data Accuracy SAE Technical Paper 900171 1990 https://doi.org/10.4271/900171