This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of Adjacent Vehicle Seat Positions on Child Restraint System (CRS) Performance in Far-Side Impacts
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 29, 2022 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Many vehicles allow consumers to adapt the vehicle environment to their families’ needs by folding or removing one or more rear row seats. It is currently unclear how different seat configurations affect child restraint systems (CRS) installed in adjacent seats. The objective is to quantify CRS performance in far-side impacts when the seating position adjacent to the CRS is in its normal upright position, folded in half, or removed. Twelve tests were conducted. Second row seats from a recent model year minivan were obtained, including full size captain’s chairs from the outboard positions and narrow seats from the center position. Rear-facing (RF) and forward-facing (FF) CRS were installed one at a time in either the outboard or center position. The seating position adjacent to the CRS was set in either the standard upright position, folded in half, or removed. Far-side impacts were conducted at 10° anterior of pure lateral at 24.8 ± 0.2 g. The Q3s ATD was used for all tests. CRS installed with the adjacent seat removed tended to have the most lateral displacement but lowest HIC36, resultant chest acceleration, and neck loads. Adjacent upright vehicle seats limited the motion of the CRS bases with mid-level level injury metrics. Adjacent folded vehicle seats reduced CRS displacement the most but resulted in higher injury metrics in the head, neck, and chest. When the RF CRS was installed in the narrow center seat with the adjacent (outboard) seat removed, the lower anchor connector of the RF CRS released from the anchor during the impact. This likely occurred due to the narrow seat cushion combined with the shape of the lower anchor hardware. With the exception of this extreme failure, the RF CRS tended to produce lower injury metrics compared to the FF CRS for all corresponding conditions.
CitationMansfield, J. and Kang, Y., "Effects of Adjacent Vehicle Seat Positions on Child Restraint System (CRS) Performance in Far-Side Impacts," SAE Technical Paper 2022-01-0848, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-0848.
- Viano , D. and Parenteau , C. Fatalities of Children 0-7 Years Old in the Second Row Traffic Inj Prev 9 3 2008 231 237 10.1080/15389580801957671
- Starnes , M. and Eigen , A.M.
- Arbogast , K. , Locey , C. , Zonfrillo , M. , and Maltese , M. Protection of Children Restrained in Child Safety Seats in Side Impact Crashes The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 69 4 2010 913 923 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e883f9
- Hauschild , H. , Humm , J. , Pintar , F. , Yoganandan , N. et al. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints Traffic Inj Prev 16 sup2 2015 S9 S15 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064116
- Mansfield , J. , Kwon , H.J. , and Kang , Y.S. Child Restraint Systems (CRS) with Minor Incompatibilities in Far Side Impacts SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0915 2021 10.4271/2021-01-0915
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 2014
- Society of Automotive Engineers SAEJ211-1 Instrumentation for Impact Test, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice Warrendale, PA SAE International 2007
- Mertz , H. , Irwin , A. , and Prasad , P. Biomechanical and Scaling Basis for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values Stapp Car Crash Journal 60 2016 625 657
- NHTSA Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 213: Child Restraint Systems Washington DC Code of Federal Regulations 2011
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) 2016 https://www.iihs.org/media/836d8002-3dd0-489a-8d0e-57790db3b3d7/iw0pnw/Ratings/Protocols/current/LATCH_protocol.pdf