This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Influence of Autonomous Vehicles on Short and Medium Distance Mode Choice for Intercity Travel
Technical Paper
2020-01-5200
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
In order to study the influence of autonomous vehicles on short and medium distance mode choice for intercity travel, this paper incorporates the latent psychological variables that affect the choice behavior of autonomous vehicles into the latent class conditional logit model and establishes a hybrid choice model to conduct the empirical research based on the theory of planned behavior. The results show that compared with the traditional multinomial logit model, the latent class conditional logit model has higher fitting goodness. Travelers can be divided into three subgroups: class1, class2, and class 3, accounting for 40.7%, 24.4%, and 34.9%, respectively. At a 5% confidence level, gender, education, occupation, monthly household income, children, and IC card significantly affect the sample’s latent class. The value of in-vehicle time of class1 and class3 are 2.400 yuan/min and 2.169 yuan/min, which is slightly higher than the total in-vehicle time value of the sample (1.799 yuan/min); the access and egress and waiting time value of class1 is as low as 0.702 yuan/min, while the value of class3 is 8.607 yuan/min. Travelers from class 1 are more sensitive to the travel costs of autonomous vehicles and intercity buses than travelers from class 3 based on the elasticity analysis.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Liu, Z., Deng, W., and Chen, Y., "Influence of Autonomous Vehicles on Short and Medium Distance Mode Choice for Intercity Travel," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5200, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5200.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 6 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 7 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 8 |
Also In
References
- Perrine , K.A. , Kockelman , K.M. , and Huang , Y. Anticipating Long-Distance Travel Shifts due to Self-Driving Vehicles Journal of Transport Geography 82 102547 2020
- Kröger , L. , Kuhnimhof , T. , and Trommer , S. Does Context Matter? A Comparative Study Modelling Autonomous Vehicle Impact on Travel Behaviour for Germany and the USA Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 122 4 146 161 2019
- Lamondia , J.J. , Fagnant , D.J. , Qu , H. et al. 2016
- Ben-Akiva , M. , Mcfadden , D. , Train , K. et al. Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges Marketing Letters 13 3 163 175 2002
- Sanbonmatsu , D.M. , Strayer , D.L. , Yu , Z. et al. Cognitive Underpinnings of Beliefs and Confidence in Beliefs about Fully Automated Vehicles Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 55 2 114 122 2018
- Kaur , K. , and Rampersad , G. Trust in Driverless Cars: Investigating Key Factors Influencing the Adoption of Driverless Cars Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 48 4 87 96 2018
- Liu , P. , Yang , R. , and Xu , Z. Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions Risk Analysis 39 2 326 341 2019
- Jing , P. , Huang , H. , Ran , B. et al. Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China Sustainability 11 4 1155 2019
- Krueger , R. , Rashidi , T.H. , and Rose , J.M. Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 69 8 343 355 2016
- Gkartzonikas , C. , and Gkritza , K. What Have We Learned? A Review of Stated Preference and Choice Studies on Autonomous Vehicles Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98 1 323 337 2019
- Mcfadden , D. The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand Journal of Public Economics 3 4 303 328 1974
- Cheng , S. , and Long , J.S. Testing for IIA in the Multinomial Logit Model Sociological Methods & Research 35 4 583 600 2007
- Wen , C. , and Koppelman , F.S. The Generalized Nested Logit Model Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35 7 627 641 2001
- Wen , C. , and Koppelman , F.S. The Generalized Nested Logit Model Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35 7 627 641 2001
- Greene , W.H. , and Hensher , D.A. A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 8 681 698 2003
- Huang , Z. , Gao , Z. , Yu , R. et al. 2017
- Ajzen , I. The Theory of Planned Behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 2 179 211 1991
- Biernacki , C. , and Govaert , G. Choosing Models in Model-Based Clustering and Discriminant Analysis Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 64 1 49 71 1999
- Barclay , D. , Higgings , C. , and Thompson , R. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Casual Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology 2 2 285 309 1995
- Gefen , D. , Straub , D. , and Boudreau , M. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4 1 1 76 2000
- Yáñez , M.F. , Raveau , S. , and Ortúzar , J.d.D. Inclusion of Latent Variables in Mixed Logit Models: Modelling and Forecasting Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44 9 744 753 2010
- Wang , J. , and Wang , X. Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus John Wiley & Sons 2019