This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil in Injection Systems: A Tribological Study
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 09, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: Automotive Technical Papers
The aim of this paper is the assessment of the possible impacts of eco-friendly fuels on injection systems by conducting tribological model tests. In this regard, lubricity (High-Frequency Reciprocating Rig, HFRR), scuffing load at different temperatures, and oxidation stability of different fuels B7, R33, pure HVO, and commercial-grade HVO diesel fuel have been deeply investigated.
As a result of our study, the HFRR wear scar diameter (WSD) shows no distinct temperature dependence for both fossil-based diesel fuels (B7 and R33). In contrast, vegetable-based ones (pure HVO and commercially available HVO-based fuel) reveal lower lubricity with a trend to higher HFRR value when the temperature is increased. The commercial HVO fuel shows, compared to the pure HVO, better HFRR values at all tested temperatures. Nevertheless, all HFRR values still stay within the limits set by the relevant fuel standards EN 590 and ASTM D975.
For all fuels, the scuffing load clearly depends on the temperature. B7 shows the highest and pure HVO the lowest scuffing load for all tested temperatures. At higher temperatures, commercially available HVO shows a similar, or even better, behavior compared to R33. The results indicate that there is no or only weak correlation between the HFRR and the scuffing load. This correlation obviously varies with fuel grades, additives, and other added substances.
HVO shows excellent oxidation stability due to its pure paraffinic character. Fossil fuels are less stable because aromatic hydrocarbons are much easier to crack than paraffins.
Combustion engines will continue to play an important role until the electrification of transportation is fully established. Our results show that alternative fuels like R33 and HVO represent good alternatives for fossil fuels in diesel engines.
CitationGevorgyan, G., Weisse, M., Erichsen, J., Weiler, K. et al., "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil in Injection Systems: A Tribological Study," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5060, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5060.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.O., Roberts, D. et al. (eds.), “Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty,” 2018, in press.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , Climate Change and Land, an IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (SRCCL) (IPCC, 2019).
- EN 14214 , “Automotive Fuels-Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) for Diesel Engines - Requirements and Test methods,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
- EN 16709 , “Automotive Fuels - High FAME Diesel Fuel (B20 and B30) - Requirements and Test Methods.”
- EN 590 , “Automotive Fuels - Diesel - Requirements and Test Methods.”
- Aatola, H., Larmi, M., Sarjovaara, T., and Mikkonen, S. , “Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a renewable diesel fuel: Trade-off between NOx, Particulate Emission, and Fuel Consumption of a Heavy Duty Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2500, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2500.
- Neste Renewable Diesel Handbook (Neste Corp., 2016).
- Damyanov, A. , Hydriertes Pflanzenöl (HVO): Zukünftige Kraftstoffe, ATZ/MTZ-Fachbuch (2019), 891-901.
- Lapuerta, M., Sánchez-Valdepenas, J., and Sukjit, E. , “Effect of Ambient Humidity and Hygroscopy on the Lubricity of Diesel Fuels,” Wear 309:200-207, 2014.
- Lehto, K., Vepsäläinen, A., Kiiski, U., and Kuronen, M. , “Diesel Fuel Comparisons with HFRR and Scuffing Load Ball-on-Cylinder Lubricity Evaluator Methods,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2761, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2761.
- ISO 12156-1: Diesel Fuel - Assessment of Lubricity Using the High-Frequency Reciprocating Rig (HFRR).
- ASTM D6079: Standard Test Method for Evaluating Lubricity of Diesel Fuels by the High-Frequency Reciprocating Rig (HFRR).
- ASTM D6078: Standard Test Method for Evaluating Lubricity of Diesel Fuels by the Scuffing Load Ball-on-Cylinder Lubricity Evaluator (SLBOCLE).
- ASTM D5706: Standard Test Method for Determining Extreme Pressure Properties of Lubricating Greases Using High-Frequency, Linear-Oscillation (SRV).
- ASTM D7421: Standard Test Method for Determining Extreme Pressure Properties of Lubricating Oils Using High-Frequency, Linear-Oscillation (SRV) Test Machine.
- ASTM D975: Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel.
- EN 15940 , “Automotive Fuels - Paraffinic Diesel Fuel from Synthesis or Hydrotreatment - Requirements and Test Methods,” 2016.
- Weinbeck, A. and Murrenhoff, H. , “Biofuel Lubricity Measurements: A Comparison of the HFRR and the SLBOCLE Test Methods,” in Tribologie Fachtagung, Göttingen, 2014.
- Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X. et al. , “Transport,” in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E. et al. (eds.) (Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).