This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
In-Situ Measurement of Component Efficiency in Connected and Automated Hybrid-Electric Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Connected and automated driving technology is known to improve real-world vehicle efficiency by considering information about the vehicle’s environment such as traffic conditions, traffic lights or road grade. This study shows how the powertrain of a hybrid-electric vehicle realizes those efficiency benefits by developing methods to directly measure real-time transient power losses of the vehicle’s powertrain components through chassis-dynamometer testing.
This study is a follow-on to SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0116, Test Methodology to Quantify and Analyze Energy Consumption of Connected and Automated Vehicles , to understand the sources of efficiency gains resulting from connected and automated vehicle driving. A 2017 Toyota Prius Prime was instrumented to collect power measurements throughout its powertrain and driven over a specific driving schedule on a chassis dynamometer. The same driving schedule was then modified to simulate a connected and automated vehicle driving profile, and the sources of vehicle efficiency improvements were analyzed. While conventional powertrain components typically only have two sources and sinks of power, e.g. an input and output shaft, the components of modern hybrid-electric vehicles are tightly integrated and have multiple sources and sinks of energy. This study describes the methods used to calculate transient power losses of the vehicle’s powertrain components while considering all sources and sinks, and results of chassis-dynamometer testing are presented.
Results of this study showed higher efficiency and lower power losses at the vehicle-level and lower overall power demand over a connected and automated vehicle (CAV)-simulated drive cycle. Despite higher losses and lower efficiency of the power electronics over the CAV drive cycle, the engine operated in a lower area of its brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) map, resulting in lower engine losses. This showed that the engine operating regime was the dominant factor driving overall vehicle efficiency.
CitationLobato, P., Jonson, K., Rengarajan, S., and Sarlashkar, J., "In-Situ Measurement of Component Efficiency in Connected and Automated Hybrid-Electric Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1284, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1284.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Rengarajan, S., Hotz, S., Hirsch, C., Lobato, P. et al. , “Test Methodology to Quantify and Analyze Energy Consumption of Connected and Automated Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0116, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0116.
- Baker, D., Asher, Z., and Bradley, T. , “V2V Communication Based Real-World Velocity Predictions for Improved HEV Fuel Economy,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1000, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1000.
- Olin, P., Aggoune, K., Tang, L., Confer, K. et al. , “Reducing Fuel Consumption by Using Information from Connected and Automated Vehicle Modules to Optimize Propulsion System Control,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1213, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1213.
- Michel, P., Karbowski, D., and Rousseau, A. , “Impact of Connectivity and Automation on Vehicle Energy Use,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0152, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0152.
- Meroux, D. and Tal, G. , “Policies to Maximize Fuel Economy of Plug-in Hybrids in a Rental Fleet,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0670, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0670.
- Imaizumi, H. and Sengoku, K. , “Estimation of CO2 Reduction Potential in Japan by Traffic-Flow Smoothing and Eco-Driving Promotion,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0621, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0621.
- Lobato, P., Rengarajan, S., Sarlashkar, J., Morgan, P. et al. , “In-Situ Measurement of Holistic Powertrain Efficiency in Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0324, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0324.
- Prakash, Niket, Cimini, Gionata, Stefanopoulou, Anna G., and Brusstar, Matthew J. , “Assessing Fuel Economy from Automated Driving: Influence of Preview and Velocity Constraints,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Volume 2: Mechatronics; Mechatronics and Controls in Advanced Manufacturing; Modeling and Control of Automotive Systems and Combustion Engines; Modeling and Validation; Motion and Vibration Control Applications; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Path Planning and Motion Control; Robot Manipulators; Sensors and Actuators; Tracking Control Systems; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Vehicle Dynamic Controls; Vehicle Dynamics and Traffic Control. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, October 12-14, 2016. V002T19A001. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2016-9780
- United States Environmental Protection Agency , “Data on Cars used for Testing Fuel Economy,” https://www.epa.gov/compliance-and-fuel-economy-data/data-cars-used-testing-fuel-economy, 2017.
- ASTM International , ASTM D4052-16 Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density, and API Gravity of Liquids by Digital Density Meter, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1520/D4052-16.
- ASTM International , “ASTM D240-17 Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1520/D0240-17.
- “Protection of Environment,” Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Pt. 600, 2017 ed.
- Rengarajan, S., Sarlashkar, J., and Lobato, P. , “In-Situ Measurement of Transmission Efficiency in Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1095, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1095.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice , “Drive Quality Evaluation for Chassis Dynamometer Testing,” SAE Standard J2951, Rev. Jan 2014.